Fact-checking as risk communication: the multi-layered risk of misinformation in times of COVID-19

References

• Brandtzaeg, P. B., and A. Følstad. 2017. “Trust and Distrust in Online Fact-Checkig Services.” Communications of the ACM 60 (9): 65–71. doi:10.1145/3122803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, J. S., F. Simon, P. N. Howard, and R. K. Nielsen. 2020. “Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation.” Reuters Institute, April 7. Accessed April 10. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/types-sources-and-claims-covid-19-misinformation.
   Google Scholar
• Brossard, D., and M. C. Nisbet. 2007. “Deference to Scientific Authority among a Low Information Public: Understanding U.S. opinion on Agricultural Biotechnology.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 19 (1): 24–52. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edl003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. “Stop the spread of rumors 2020”, April 3. Accessed 10 April 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/share-facts.html.
   Google Scholar
• Covello, V. T., R. G. Peters, J. G. Wojtecki, and R. C. Hyde. 2001. “Risk Communication, the West Nile Virus Epidemic, and Bioterrorism: responding to the Communication Challenges Posed by the Intentional or Unintentional Release of a Pathogen in an Urban Setting.” Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 78 (2): 382–391. doi:10.1093/jurban/78.2.382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel, S., D. Alba, and R. Zhong. 2020. “Surge of virus misinformation stumps Facebook and Twitter.” New York Times, March 3, 2020. Accessed 10 April 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/08/technology/coronavirus-misinformation-social-media.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. 2020. “Open letter to the murdochs.” Medium.com, April 3, 2020. Accessed 10 April 2020. https://medium.com/@journalismprofs/open-letter-to-the-murdochs-9334e775a992.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, Lucas. 2016. Deciding What’s True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, Thomas, Arjen Van Dalen, and Nina Steindl. 2018. “Caught in the Nexus: A Comparative and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Trust in the Press.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 23 (1): 3–23. doi:10.1177/1940161217740695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, Sven Ove. 2010. “Risk: objective or Subjective, Facts or Values.” Journal of Risk Research 13 (2): 231–238. doi:10.1080/13669870903126226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S., D. A. Scheufele, and E. A. Corley. 2011. “Value Predispositions, Mass Media, and Attitudes toward Nanotechnology: The Interplay of Public and Experts.” Science Communication 33 (2): 167–200. doi:10.1177/1075547010380386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju, Y., J. Lim, M. Shim, and M. You. 2015. “Outrage Factors in Government Press Releases of Food Risk and Their Influence on News Media Coverage.” Journal of Health Communication 20 (8): 879–887. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1018602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser Family Foundation. 2020. KFF coronavirus poll – March 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kata, A. 2012. “Anti-Vaccine Activists, Web 2.0, and the Postmodern Paradigm–an Overview of Tactics and Tropes Used Online by the anti-Vaccination Movement.” Vaccine 30 (25): 3778–3789. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., S. K. Yeo, D. Brossard, D. A. Scheufele, and M. A. Xenos. 2014. “Disentangling the Influence of Value Predispositions and Risk/Benefit Perceptions on Support for Nanotechnology among the American Public.” Risk Analysis 34 (5): 965–980. doi:10.1111/risa.12141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108 (3): 480–498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznia, R., and D. Griffin. 2020. “How did coronavirus break out? Theories abound as researchers race to solve genetic detective story.” CNN.com, April 6, 2020. Accessed 10 April 2020. https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/06/us/coronavirus-scientists-debate-origin-theories-invs/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N.,. R. Fletcher, A. Kalogeropoulos, and R. K. Nielsen. 2019. Reuters Institute digital news report 2019. Reuters Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Offit, Paul A., and Susan E. Coffin. 2003. “Communicating Science to the Public: MMR Vaccine and Autism.” Vaccine 22 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00532-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2019a. “Many Americans say made-up news is a problem that needs to be fixed,” June 5. Accessed 12 December 2019. https://www.journalism.org/2019/06/05/many-americans-say-made-up-news-is-a-critical-problem-that-needs-to-be-fixed/.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2019b. “Republicans far more likely than Democrats to say fact-checkers tend to favor one side,” June 27. Accessed 12 December 2019. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/27/republicans-far-more-likely-than-democrats-to-say-fact-checkers-tend-to-favor-one-side/.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2020. “Explore the data.” Accessed 10 April 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/pathways-2020/covidcover2/main_source_of_election_news/us_adults/.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, S. 1992. “Cultural Theory and Risk Analysis.” In Social Theories of Risk, edited by S. Krimsky and D. Golding, 83–115. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. 1992. “Concepts of Risk: A Classification.” In Social Theories of Risk, edited by S. Krimsky and D. Golding, 53–79. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Requarth, T. 2020. “Please, let’s stop the epidemic of armchair epidemiology,” Slate, March 26, 2020. Accessed 20 April 2020. https://slate.com/technology/2020/03/armchair-epidemiology-coronavirus.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sandman, P. M. 1987. “Risk Communication: Facing Public Outrage.” Epa J 13 : 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. 2013. “Communicating Science in Social Settings.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (Supplement_3): 14040–14047. doi:10.1073/pnas.1213275110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., and N. M. Krause. 2019. “Science Audiences, Misinformation, and Fake News.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (16): 7662–7669. doi:10.1073/pnas.1805871115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Service, R. F. 2020. “NAS Letter Suggests ‘Normal Breathing’ Can Expel Coronavirus.” Science 368 (6487): 119–119. doi:10.1126/science.368.6487.119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. 2000. “The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology.” Risk Analysis 20 (2): 195–203. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.202020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 1992. “Perception of Risk: Reflections on the Psychometric Paradigm.” In Social Theories of Risk, edited by S. Krimsky and D. Golding, 117–152. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Southwell, B. G., E. Thorson, and L. Sheble, eds. 2018. Misinformation and Mass Audiences. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trumbo, C. W. 2002. “Information Processing and Risk Perception: An Adaptation of the Heuristics Systematic Model.” Journal of Communication 52 (2): 367–382. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02550.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. 2020. “Don’t Believe the COVID-19 Models.” The Atlantic, April 2, 2020. Accessed 20 April 2020. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/04/coronavirus-models-arent-supposed-be-right/609271/?fbclid=IwAR3Sz117_0qniVmCbkWV1JxP1OtiNWm2XCfhRrf2aisM5W6RfMBBt3X1_Q8.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Bles, A. M., S. van der Linden, A. L. Freeman, and D. J. Spiegelhalter. 2020. “The Effects of Communicating Uncertainty on Public Trust in Facts and Numbers.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (14): 7672–7683. doi:10.1073/pnas.1913678117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldrop, T., D. Alsup, and E. McLaughlin. 2020. “Fearing coronavirus, Arizona man dies after taking a form of chloroquine used to treat aquariums.” CNN.com, March 25, 2020. Accessed 10 April 2020. https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/23/health/arizona-coronavirus-chloroquine-death/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2020a. “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public: Myth busters.” Accessed 10 April 2020. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/myth-busters.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2020b. “Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). situation report - 13.” Accessed 10 April 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200202-sitrep-13-ncov-v3.pdf.
   Google Scholar