The co-evolution of government risk communication practice and context for environmental health emergencies

References

• Alaszewski, A. 2005. “Risk Communication: Identifying the Importance of Social Context.” Health, Risk & Society 7 (2): 101–105. doi:10.1080/13698570500148905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins, D., A. Fitzsimmons, C. Parsons, and A. Punter. 2011. “Roads to Ruin – a Study of Major Risk Events: Their Origins.” In Impact and Implications, edited by Cass Business School. Airmic.
   Google Scholar
• Balog-Way, D., K. McComas, and J. Besley. 2020. “The Evolving Field of Risk Communication.” Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 40 (S1): 2240–2262. doi:10.1111/risa.13615.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berbel, J., and E. Esteban. 2019. “Droughts as a Catalyst for Water Policy Change. Analysis of Spain, Australia (MDB), and California.” Global Environmental Change 58: 101969. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner, A., B. Littig, and W. Menz. 2009. Interviewing Experts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å. 2009. “Speaking of Risk: Matters of Context.” Environmental Communication 3 (3): 335–354. doi:10.1080/17524030903230132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å. 2019a. “Lessons of Success and Failure: Practicing Risk Communication at Government Agencies.” Safety Science 118: 158–167. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å. 2019b. “Risk Communication as Government Agency Organizational Practice.” Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 39 (8): 1695–1707. doi:10.1111/risa.13302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å., H. Corvellec, and M. Karlsson. 2012. “The Practice of Risk Governance: Lessons from the Field.” Journal of Risk Research 15 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.587886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchers Arriagada, N., A. J. Palmer, D. M. J. S. Bowman, G. G. Morgan, B. B. Jalaludin, and F. H. Johnston. 2020. “Unprecedented Smoke-Related Health Burden Associated with the 2019-20 Bushfires in Eastern Australia.” The Medical Journal of Australia 213 (6): 282–283. doi:10.5694/mja2.50545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, D. M. J. S., G. J. Williamson, J. T. Abatzoglou, C. A. Kolden, M. A. Cochrane, and A. M. S. Smith. 2017. “Human Exposure and Sensitivity to Globally Extreme Wildfire Events.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 1 (3): 58. doi:10.1038/s41559-016-0058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J., S. McCluskey, E. Turley, and N. King. 2015. “The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 12 (2): 202–222. doi:10.1080/14780887.2014.955224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chess, C. 2001. “Organizational Theory and the Stages of Risk Communication.” Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 21 (1): 179–188. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.211100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chess, C, and B. B. Johnson. 2009. “Risk Communication by Organizations: The Back Story.” In Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication, edited by R. L. Heath and D. O’Hair, 323–342. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Claassen, L., F. Greven, F. Woudenberg, and D. Timmermans. 2021. “Stay Clear from the Smoke’: effects of Alternative Public Messages in Case of Large-Scale Chemical Fires.” Journal of Risk Research 24 (11): 1426–1438. doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1863848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corradi, G., S. Gherardi, and L. Verzelloni. 2010. “Through the Practice Lens: Where is the Bandwagon of Practice-Based Studies Heading?” Management Learning 41 (3): 265–283. doi:10.1177/1350507609356938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (ed.). 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Emergency Management Victoria [EMV]. 2016. State Smoke Framework. Version 3.0. State Government of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, J. A., M. D. J. Peters, I. Ramsey, G. Sharplin, N. Corsini, and M. Eckert. 2017. “Effectiveness of Public Health Messaging and Communication Channels during Smoke Events: A Rapid Systematic Review.” Journal of Environmental Management 193: 247–256. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galletta, A. 2013. Mastering the Semi-Structured Interview and beyond: From Research Design to Analysis and Publication. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glik, D. C. 2007. “Risk Communication for Public Health Emergencies.” Annual Review of Public Health 28 (1): 33–54. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greven, F. E., L. Claassen, F. Woudenberg, F. Duijm, and D. Timmermans. 2018. “Where There’s Smoke, There’s Fire: Focal Points for Risk Communication.” International Journal of Environmental Health Research 28 (3): 240–252. doi:10.1080/09603123.2018.1468422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., A. Bunce, and L. Johnson. 2006. “How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.” Field Methods 18 (1): 59–82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagaman, A. K., and A. Wutich. 2017. “How Many Interviews Are Enough to Identify Metathemes in Multisited and Cross-Cultural Research? Another Perspective on Guest, Bunce, and Johnson’s (2006) Landmark Study.” Field Methods 29 (1): 23–41. doi:10.1177/1525822X16640447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handler, A., M. Issel, and B. Turnock. 2001. “A Conceptual Framework to Measure Performance of the Public Health System.” American Journal of Public Health 91 (8): 1235–1239. doi:10.2105/ajph.91.8.1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, R. L., and H. D. O’Hair. eds. 2009. Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. B. 1987. “Accounting for the Social Context of Risk Communication.” Science & Technology Studies 5 (3/4): 103–111. www.jstor.org/stable/690429.
   Google Scholar
• Loroño-Leturiondo, M., P. O’Hare, S. Cook, S. R. Hoon, and S. Illingworth. 2018. “Give Me Five! – Reasons for Two-Way Communication between Experts and Citizens in Relation to Air Pollution Risk.” Advances in Science and Research 15: 45–50. doi:10.5194/asr-15-45-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Advisory Committee. 2016. Independent Inquiry into the Environment Protection Authority. Victoria, Australia: Submitted to Minister for Environment, Climate Change and Water.
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of Victoria. 2019. Inquiry into Recycling and Waste Management: Final Report. Legislative Council Environment and Planning Committee: Victorian Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Reisen, F., S. M. Duran, M. Flannigan, C. Elliott, and K. Rideout. 2015. “Wildfire Smoke and Public Health Risk.” International Journal of Wildland Fire 24 (8): 1029–1044. doi:10.1071/WF15034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickard, L. N. 2021. “Pragmatic and (or) Constitutive? On the Foundations of Contemporary Risk Communication Research.” Risk Analysis 41 (3): 466–479. doi:10.1111/risa.13415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savoia, E., L. Lin, and G. M. Gamhewage. 2017. “A Conceptual Framework for the Evaluation of Emergency Risk Communications.” American Journal of Public Health 107 (S2): S208–S214. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.304040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellnow, D. D., J. Iverson, and T. L. Sellnow. 2017. “The Evolution of the Operational Earthquake Forecasting Community of Practice: The L’aquila Communication Crisis as a Triggering Event for Organizational Renewal.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 45 (2): 121–139. doi:10.1080/00909882.2017.1288295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M, C. Klemm, B. Hutchins, and S. Kaufman. 2021. “Unpacking the Realities and Complexities of Sensemaking: Government Practitioners’ Experiences of Emergency Risk Communication.” Risk Analysis. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/risa.13828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teague, B., J. Catford, and S. Petering. 2014. Hazelwood Mine Fire Inquiry Report Hazelwood Mine Fire Inquiry: Victorian Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [WHO]. 2016. Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. doi:10.17159/2410-972X/2016/v26n2a4.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [WHO]. 2018. Communicating Risk in Public Health Emergencies: A WHO Guideline for Emergency Risk Communication (ERC) Policy and Practice. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Yell, S., M. Duffy, S. Whyte, L. Walker, M. Carroll, and J. Walker. 2019. Hazelwood Health Study, Community Wellbeing Stream Report – Volume 1: Community Perceptions of the Impact of the Smoke Event on Community Wellbeing and of the Effectiveness of Communication during and after the Smoke Event. Melbourne: Hazelwood Health Study.
   Google Scholar