Revisiting the primary bias: the role of innumeracy in the misperception of prevalence of chronic illnesses

References

• Althaus, C. E. 2005. “A Disciplinary Perspective on the Epistemological Status of Risk.” Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 25 (3): 567–588. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00625.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attneave, F. 1953. “Psychological Probability as a Function of Experienced Frequency.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (2): 81–86. doi:10.1037/h0057955.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baron, J. 2006. Thinking and Deciding. 4e éd. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511840265.
   Google Scholar
• Bernell, S., and S. W. Howard. 2016. “Use Your Words Carefully : What is a Chronic Disease?” Frontiers in Public Health 4: 159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budescu, D., A. Abbas, and L. Wu. 2011. “Does Probability Weighting Matter in Probability Elicitation?” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 55 (4): 320–327. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2011.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, R. H., P. Lu, J. Nocedal, and C. Zhu. 1995. “A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization.” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 16 (5): 1190–1208. doi:10.1137/0916069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R. 2018. “Gender Differences in Adult Numeracy Skills : What is the Role of Education?” Educational Research and Evaluation 24 (6–7): 370–393. doi:10.1080/13803611.2018.1540992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davids, S. L., M. M. Schapira, T. L. McAuliffe, and A. B. Nattinger. 2004. “Predictors of Pessimistic Breast Cancer Risk Perceptions in a Primary Care Population.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 19 (4): 310–315. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.20801.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruin, W. B., B. Fischhoff, S. G. Millstein, and B. L. Halpern-Felsher. 2000. “Verbal and Numerical Expressions of Probability:“It’s a Fifty–Fifty Chance.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 81 (1): 115–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, M. A., N. D. Weinstein, and J. O’Reilly. 1993. “Scales for Assessing Perceptions of Health Hazard Susceptibility.” Health Education Research 8 (2): 181–192. doi:10.1093/her/8.2.181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DREES. 2015. L’état de santé de la population en France—Rapport 2015. Direction de la recherche, des études, de l’évaluation et des statistiques. https://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/publications/rapports/letat-de-sante-de-la-population-en-france-rapport-2015
   Google Scholar
• Dryhurst, S., C. R. Schneider, J. Kerr, A. L. J. Freeman, G. Recchia, A. M. Bles, D. van der Spiegelhalter, and S. van der Linden. 2020. “Risk Perceptions of COVID-19 around the World.” Journal of Risk Research 23 (7–8): 994. doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finucane, M. L., P. Slovic, C. K. Mertz, J. Flynn, and T. A. Satterfield. 2000. “Gender, Race, and Perceived Risk : The « White Male » Effect.” Health, Risk & Society 2 (2): 159–172. doi:10.1080/713670162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B. 2012. Risk analysis and human behavior. London and New York: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Frijling, B. D., C. M. Lobo, I. M. Keus, K. M. Jenks, R. P. Akkermans, M. E. J. L. Hulscher, A. Prins, J. C. van der Wouden, and R. P. T. M. Grol. 2004. “Perceptions of Cardiovascular Risk among Patients with Hypertension or Diabetes.” Patient Education and Counseling 52 (1): 47–53. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00248-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. 1991. “How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear : Beyond “Heuristics and Biases.” European Review of Social Psychology 2 (1): 83–115. doi:10.1080/14792779143000033.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., K. Fiedler, and H. Olsson. 2012. “Rethinking Cognitive Biases as Environmental Consequences.” In ABC Research Group, Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world, edited by P. M. Todd, G. Gigerenzer, 80–110. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T., D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman. (Éds.). 2002. Heuristics and Biases : The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808098.
   Google Scholar
• Hakes, J. K., and W. K. Viscusi. 2004. “Dead Reckoning : Demographic Determinants of the Accuracy of Mortality Risk Perceptions.” Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 24 (3): 651–664. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00465.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F., C. P. Benbow, D. C. Geary, R. C. Gur, J. S. Hyde, and M. A. Gernsbacher. 2007. “The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society 8 (1): 1–51. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris, A. J., A. Corner, and U. Hahn. 2009. “Estimating the Probability of Negative Events.” Cognition 110 (1): 51–‑64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A, and K. Preacher. 2014. Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12028.
   Google Scholar
• Hertwig, R., T. Pachur, and S. Kurzenhäuser. 2005. “Judgments of Risk Frequencies : Tests of Possible Cognitive Mechanisms.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (4): 621–642. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J., and C. Doucouliagos. 2013. “What’s to Know about the Credibility of Empirical Economics?” Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (5): 997–1004. doi:10.1111/joes.12032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. J., and A. Tversky. 1983. “Affect, Generalization, and the Perception of Risk.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (1): 20–31. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., D. Braman, J. Gastil, P. Slovic, and C. K. Mertz. 2007. “Culture and Identity-Protective Cognition: Explaining the White-Male Effect in Risk Perception.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4 (3): 465–505. doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1973. “On the Psychology of Prediction.” Psychological Review 80 (4): 237–251. doi:10.1037/h0034747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, S., P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, M. Layman, and B. Combs. 1978. “Judged Frequency of Lethal Events.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4 (6): 551–578. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.551.
   Google Scholar
• Lipkus, I. M., G. Samsa, and B. K. Rimer. 2001. “General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples.” Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 21 (1): 37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundborg, P., and B. Lindgren. 2004. “Do They Know What They Are Doing? Risk Perceptions and Smoking Behaviour among Swedish Teenagers.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28 (3): 261–286. doi:10.1023/B:RISK.0000026098.84109.62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl, K., M. Debin, C. Souty, C. Guerrisi, C. Turbelin, A. Falchi, I. Bonmarin, et al. 2021. “Are People Optimistically Biased about the Risk of COVID-19 Infection? Lessons from the First Wave of the Pandemic in Europe.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 (1): 436. doi:10.3390/ijerph19010436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., and C. R. Harris. 2012. “Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined.” Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science 7 (6): 531–536. doi:10.1177/1745691612463401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters, E. 2008. “Numeracy and the Perception and Communication of Risk.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1128 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1196/annals.1399.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petrova, D. G., J. Van der Pligt, and R. Garcia-Retamero. 2014. “Feeling the Numbers : On the Interplay between Risk, Affect, and Numeracy.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 27 (3): 191–199. doi:10.1002/bdm.1803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., and A. F. Hayes. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods 40 (3): 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prelec, D. 1998. “The Probability Weighting Function.” Econometrica 66 (3): 497–527. doi:10.2307/2998573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raude, J., C. Fischler, M. Setbon, and A. Flahault. 2005. “Scientist and Public Responses to BSE-Related Risk : A Comparative Study.” Journal of Risk Research 8 (7–8): 663–678. doi:10.1080/13669870500194825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raude, J., P. Peretti-Watel, J. Ward, C. Flamand, and P. Verger. 2018. “Are Perceived Prevalences of Infection Also Biased and How? Lessons from Large Epidemics of Mosquito-Borne Diseases in Tropical Regions.” Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 38 (3): 377–‑389. doi:10.1177/0272989X17750845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., W. L. Nelson, P. K. Han, and N. F. Dieckmann. 2009. “How Numeracy Influences Risk Comprehension and Medical Decision Making.” Psychological Bulletin 135 (6): 943–973. doi:10.1037/a0017327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, A. J., and M. T. Kiviniemi. 1999. “Treating People with Information : An Analysis and Review of Approaches to Communicating Health Risk Information.” JNCI Monographs 1999 (25): 44–51. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024207.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggeri, K., S. Alí, M. L. Berge, G. Bertoldo, L. D. Bjørndal, A. Cortijos-Bernabeu, C. Davison, et al. 2020. “Replicating Patterns of Prospect Theory for Decision under Risk.” Nature Human Behaviour 4 (6): 622–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, L. M., S. Woloshin, W. C. Black, and H. G. Welch. 1997. “The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography.” Annals of Internal Medicine 127 (11): 966–972. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 1999. “Are Trivial Risks the Greatest Risks of All?” Journal of Risk Research 2 (4): 281–288. doi:10.1080/136698799376727.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., M. L. Finucane, E. Peters, and D. G. MacGregor. 2007. “The Affect Heuristic.” European Journal of Operational Research 177 (3): 1333–1352. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1992. “Advances in Prospect Theory : Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (4): 297–323. doi:10.1007/BF00122574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscusi, W. K. 1990. “Do Smokers Underestimate Risks?” Journal of Political Economy 98 (6): 1253–1269. doi:10.1086/261733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosgerau, J. 2010. “How Prevalent is Wishful Thinking? Misattribution of Arousal Causes Optimism and Pessimism in Subjective Probabilities.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 139 (1): 32–48. doi:10.1037/a0018144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, D., V. Skirbekk, I. Freund, and A. Herlitz. 2014. “The Changing Face of Cognitive Gender Differences in Europe.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (32): 11673–11678. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319538111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N. D. 1998. “Accuracy of Smokers’ Risk Perceptions.” Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine 20 (2): 135–140. doi:10.1007/BF02884459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woloshin, S., and L. M. Schwartz. 2011. “Communicating Data about the Benefits and Harms of Treatment : A Randomized Trial.” Annals of Internal Medicine 155 (2): 87–96. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, G., and R. Gonzalez. 1996. “Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function.” Management Science 42 (12): 1676–1690. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.12.1676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcin, S. 2019. “Competence Differences in Literacy, Numeracy, and Problem Solving according to Sex.” Adult Education Quarterly 69 (2): 101–119. doi:10.1177/0741713619827386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar