Experimental support for a trust heuristic

References

• Bélanger, France and Lemuria Carter. 2008. “Trust and Risk in E-Government Adoption.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17 (2): 165–176. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beldad, Ardion, Menno De Jong, and Michaël Steehouder. 2011. “I Trust Not Therefore It Must Be Risky: Determinants of the Perceived Risks of Disclosing Personal Data for e-Government Transactions.” Computers in Human Behavior 27 (6): 2233–2242. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, Lehman, III and Lee Roy Beach. 1996. “The Effects of Time Constraints on the Prechoice Screening of Decision Options.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67 (2): 222–228. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruin, Ellen N. M., and Paul A. M. Van Lange. 1999. “Impression Formation and Cooperative Behavior.” European Journal of Social Psychology 29 (2–3): 305–328. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3 < 305::AID-EJSP929 > 3.0.CO;2-R.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, Shelly, Akiva Liberman, and Alice H. Eagly. 1989. “Heuristic and Systematic Information Processing within and beyond the Persuasion Context.” In Unintended Thought, edited by J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh, 212–252. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Jong Kyu, and Yong Gu Ji. 2015. “Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 31 (10): 692–702. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Dijker, Anton J., and Willem Koomen. 1996. “Stereotyping and Attitudinal Effects under Time Pressure.” European Journal of Social Psychology 26 (1): 61–74. #. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199601)26:1 < 61::AID-EJSP737 > 3.0.CO;2-.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, Graham, P. Sol Hart, Christopher Clarke, Nicole H. O’Donnell, and Jay Hmielowski. 2020. “What Drives Support for Self-Driving Car Technology in the United States?” Journal of Risk Research 23 (3): 275–213. doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1517384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, Timothy C. 2010. “Trust in Risk Management: A Model-Based Review of Empirical Research.” Risk Analysis 30 (4): 541–574. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01398.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, Timothy C., M. Siegrist, and H. Gutscher. 2007. “Trust, Risk Perception, and the TCC Model of Cooperation.” In Trust in Cooperative Risk Management: Uncertainty and Scepticism in the Public Mind, edited by M. Siegrist, T. C. Earle, and H. Gutscher, 1–50. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Finucane, Melissa L., A. L. I. Alhakami, Paul Slovic, and Stephen M. Johnson. 2000. “The Affect Heuristic in Judgments of Risks and Benefits.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, Daniel T. and Michael J. Gill. 2000. “The Momentary Realist.” Psychological Science 11 (5): 394–398. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, Daniel T., Romin W. Tafarodi, and Patrick S. Malone. 1993. “You Can’ t Not Believe Everything You Read.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (2): 221–233.
   Google Scholar
• Grabner-Kräuter, Sonja and Ewald A. Kaluscha. 2003. “Empirical Research in on-Line Trust: A Review and Critical Assessment.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58 (6): 783–812. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00043-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, Andrew F. 2017. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. https://www.guilford.com/books/Introduction-to-Mediation-Moderation-and-Conditional-Process-Analysis/Andrew-Hayes/9781462534654.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Branden B. and Paul Slovic. 1995. “Presenting Uncertainty in Health Risk Assessment: Initial Studies of Its Effects on Risk Perception and Trust.” Risk Analysis 15 (4): 485–494. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00341.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel and S. Frederick. 2005. “A Model of Heuristic Judgment.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, 267–293. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky. 1973. “On the Psychology of Prediction.” Psychological Review 80 (4): 237–251. doi:10.1037/h0034747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivijärvi, Hannu, Akseli Leppänen, and Petri Hallikainen. 2013. “Antecedents of Information Technology Trust and the Effect of Trust on Perceived Performance Improvement.” International Journal of Social and Organizational Dynamics in IT 3 (3): 17–32. doi:10.4018/ijsodit.2013070102.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Xin, Traci J. Hess, and Joseph S. Valacich. 2008. “Why Do We Trust New Technology? A Study of Initial Trust Formation with Organizational Information Systems.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17 (1): 39–71. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2008.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, Sarah, Paul Slovic, Baruch Fischhoff, Mark Layman, and Barbara Combs. 1978. “Judged Frequency of Lethal Events.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4 (6): 551–578. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.551.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Lu, Thijs Bouman, Goda Perlaviciute, and Linda Steg. 2020. “Effects of Competence- and Integrity-Based Trust on Public Acceptability of Renewable Energy Projects in China and The Netherlands.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 67 (February): 101390. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101390.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Peng, Zhigang Xu, and Xiangmo Zhao. 2019. “Road Tests of Self-Driving Vehicles: Affective and Cognitive Pathways in Acceptance Formation.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 124 (June): 354–369. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.004.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Peng, Run Yang, and Zhigang Xu. 2019. “Public Acceptance of Fully Automated Driving: Effects of Social Trust and Risk/Benefit Perceptions.” Risk Analysis 39 (2): 326–341. doi:10.1111/risa.13143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, Margaret Mooney and Burton Singer. 1999. “Causality in the Social Science.” American Sociological Association 18: 347–409. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/271053.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Maule, A. J., and O. Svenson. 1993. “Concluding Remarks.” In TIme Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making, edited by A.J. Maule and O. Svenson, 323–329. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, X. L., R. Rosenthal, and D. B. Rubin. 1992. “Comparing Correlated Correlation Coefficients.” Psychological Bulletin 111 (1): 172–175. https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/bul/111/1/172.html?uid=1992-15158-001. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordóñez, Lisa, and Lehman Benson, III. 1997. “Decisions under Time Pressure: How Time Constraint Affects Risky Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 71 (2): 121–140. doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, Fred G. W. C., and Jeroen J. G. Van Merriënboer. 1994. “Instructional Control of Cognitive Load in the Training of Complex Cognitive Tasks.” Educational Psychology Review 6 (4): 351–371. doi:10.1007/BF02213420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachur, Thorsten, Ralph Hertwig, and Florian Steinmann. 2012. “How Do People Judge Risks: Availability Heuristic, Affect Heuristic, or Both?” Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied 18 (3): 314–330. doi:10.1037/a0028279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W., E. J. Johnson, and J. R. Bettman. 1988. “Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making.” Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 14 (3): 534–552. http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=fulltext.journal&jcode=xlm&vol=14&issue=3&format=html&page=534&expand=1. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer, Eyal, Laura Brandimarte, Sonam Samat, and Alessandro Acquisti. 2017. “Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70: 153–163. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raue, Martina and Sabine G. Scholl. 2018. “The Use of Heuristics in Decision Making under Risk and Uncertainty.” In Psychological Perspectives on Risk and Risk Analysis: Theory, Models, and Applications, 153–179. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_7.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Denise M., Sim B. Sitkin, Ronald S. Burt, and Colin Camerer. 1998. “Not so Different after All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust.” Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 393–404. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, Anuj K., and Daniel M. Oppenheimer. 2008. “Heuristics Made Easy: An Effort-Reduction Framework.” Psychological Bulletin 134” (2): 207–222. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael. 1999. “A Causal Model Explaining the Perception and Acceptance of Gene Technology.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29 (10): 2093–2106. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb02297.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael. 2000. “The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology.” Risk Analysis 20 (2): 195–204. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.202020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael. 2019. “Trust and Risk Perception: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Risk Analysis risa. 41 (3): 13325. doi:10.1111/risa.13325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael, Melanie Connor, and Carmen Keller. 2012. “Trust, Confidence, Procedural Fairness, Outcome Fairness, Moral Conviction, and the Acceptance of GM Field Experiments.” Risk Analysis 32 (8): 1394–1403. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01739.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael, and George Cvetkovich. 2000. “Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge.” Risk Analysis 20 (5): 713–720. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.205064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael, George Cvetkovich, and Claudia Roth. 2000. “Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception.” Risk Analysis 20 (3): 353–362. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.203034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael, Timothy C. Earle, and Heinz Gutscher. 2003. “Test of a Trust and Confidence Model in the Applied Context of Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Risks.” Risk Analysis 23 (4): 705–716. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael and Heinz Gutscher. 2006. “Flooding Risks: A Comparison of Lay People’s Perceptions and Expert’s Assessments in Switzerland.” Risk Analysis 26 (4): 971–979. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00792.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael, Heinz Gutscher, and Timothy C. Earle. 2005. “Perception of Risk: The Influence of General Trust, and General Confidence.” Journal of Risk Research 8 (2): 145–156. doi:10.1080/1366987032000105315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael, Nathalie Stampfli, and Hans Kastenholz. 2008. “Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Functional Foods. The Influence of Carrier, Benefit and Trust.” Appetite 51 (3): 526–29. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael and Alexandra Zingg. 2014. “The Role of Public Trust during Pandemics: Implications for Crisis Communication.” European Psychologist 19 (1): 23–32. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, Paul, Melissa L. Finucane, Ellen Peters, and Donald G. MacGregor. 2007. “The Affect Heuristic.” European Journal of Operational Research 177 (3): 1333–1352. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, Paul, James H. Flynn, and Mark Layman. 1991. “Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of Nuclear Waste.” Source: Science, New Series 254: 1603–1607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiller, Stephen A., Gavan J. Fitzsimons, John G. Lynch, and Gary H. McClelland. 2013. “Spotlights, Floodlights, Andthe Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression.” Journal of Marketing Research 50 (2): 277–288. doi:10.1509/jmr.12.0420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, William B., J. Gregory. Hixon, Alan Stein-Seroussi, and Daniel T. Gilbert. 1990. “The Fleeting Gleam of Praise: Cognitive Processes Underlying Behavioral Reactions to Self-Relevant Feedback.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ” 59 (1): 17–26. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.59.1.17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terpstra, Teun. 2011. “Emotions, Trust, and Perceived Risk: Affective and Cognitive Routes to Flood Preparedness Behavior.” Risk Analysis 31 (10): 1658–1675. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwel, Bart W., Fieke Harinck, Naomi Ellemers, and Dancker D. L. Daamen. 2009. “Competence-Based and Integrity-Based Trust as Predictors of Acceptance of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS).” Risk Analysis 29 (8): 1129–1140. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01256.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, Jason Bennett, D. Harrison McKnight, Elizabeth White Baker, Riza Ergun Arsal, and Nicholas H. Roberts. 2011. “The Role of Trust in Postadoption IT Exploration: An Empirical Examination of Knowledge Management Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 58 (1): 56–70. doi:10.1109/TEM.2009.2028320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo, Craig W. 1999. “Heuristic-Systematic Information Processing and Risk Judgment.” Risk Analysis 19 (3): 391–400. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00415.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumlison, Creed, Rachael M. Moyer, and Geoboo Song. 2017. “The Origin and Role of Trust in Local Policy Elites’ Perceptions of High-Voltage Power Line Installations in the State of Arkansas.” Risk Analysis 37 (5): 1018–1036. doi:10.1111/risa.12662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 185 (4157): 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau 2019. “United States Quick Facts.” https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219.
   Google Scholar
• Vainio, Annukka, Riikka Paloniemi, and Vilja Varho. 2017. “Weighing the Risks of Nuclear Energy and Climate Change: Trust in Different Information Sources, Perceived Risks, and Willingness to Pay for Alternatives to Nuclear Power.” Risk Analysis 37 (3): 557–569. doi:10.1111/risa.12640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers, Vivianne H. M., Carmen Keller, and Michael Siegrist. 2011. “Climate Change Benefits and Energy Supply Benefits as Determinants of Acceptance of Nuclear Power Stations: Investigating an Explanatory Model.” Energy Policy 39 (6): 3621–3629. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers, Vivianne H. M., and Michael Siegrist. 2008. “Exploring the Triangular Relationship between Trust, Affect, and Risk Perception: A Review of the Literature.” Risk Management 10 (3): 156–167. doi:10.1057/rm.2008.1.
   Google Scholar
• Visschers, Vivianne H. M., and Michael Siegrist. 2018. “Differences in Risk Perception between Hazards and between Individuals.” In Psychological Perspectives on Risk and Risk Analysis: Theory, Models, and Applications, 63–80. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_3.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Robyn S., Adam Zwickle, and Hugh Walpole. 2019. “Developing a Broadly Applicable Measure of Risk Perception.” Risk Analysis 39 (4): 777–791. doi:10.1111/risa.13207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Kewen, Yuxiang Zhao, Qinghua Zhu, Xiaojie Tan, and Hua Zheng. 2011. “A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Trust on Technology Acceptance Model: Investigation of Moderating Influence of Subject and Context Type.” International Journal of Information Management 31 (6): 572–581. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. 1980. “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences.” American Psychologist 35 (2): 151–175. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Tingru, Da Tao, Xingda Qu, Xiaoyan Zhang, Rui Lin, and Wei Zhang. 2019. “The Roles of Initial Trust and Perceived Risk in Public’s Acceptance of Automated Vehicles.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 98: 207–220. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zur, Hasida Ben, and Shlomo Breznitz. 1981. “The Effect of Time Pressure on Risky Choice Behavior.” Acta Psychologica 47 (2): 89–104. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(81)90001-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar