38
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Comment

Energy transition and risk analysis: a commentary

Received 17 May 2024, Accepted 23 May 2024, Published online: 20 Jun 2024

References

  • Beck, U. 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Auf den Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
  • Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society Toward a New Modernity. London: Sage.
  • Becker, G. 1983. “A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics98 (3) : 371–400.
  • Binder, S., and E. Neumayer. 2005. “Environmental Pressure Group Strength and Air Pollution: An Empirical Analysis.” Ecological Economics 55 (4): 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.009.
  • De Jong, E. R., and M. Faure. 2023. “De corrigerende rol van het aansprakelijkheidsrecht bij de bedrijfsmatige vervuiling van de leefomgeving.” Justitiële verkenningen 49 (4): 75–85. https://doi.org/10.5553/JV/016758502023049004006.
  • Faure, M. 2014. “The Complementary Roles of Liability, Regulation and Insurance in Safety Management: Theory and Practice.” Journal of Risk Research 17 (6): 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.889199.
  • Faure, M., and L. Visscher. 2011. “The Role of Experts in Assessing Damages – A Law and Economics Account.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 2 (3): 376–396. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00001392.
  • Katdare, M. 2024. “Precautionary Principle: Does It Play a Role in EU Decision-Making?” Diss. Erasmus School of Law Rotterdam (to be defended as PhD thesis).
  • Lofstedt, R. E. 2015. “Effective Risk Communication and CCS: The Road to Success in Europe.” Journal of Risk Research 18 (6): 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2015.1017831.
  • Lofstedt, R. E. 2019. “The Communication of Radon Risk in Sweden: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?” Journal of Risk Research 22 (6): 773–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1473467.
  • Lofstedt, R., and A. Schlag. 2017. “Risk-Risk Trade-Offs: What Should We Do in Europe?” Journal of Risk Research 20 (8): 963–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1153505.
  • Meadow, W., and C. Sunstein. 2001. “Statistics, Not Experts.” Duke Law Journal 51 (2): 629–646. https://doi.org/10.2307/1373203.
  • Ogus, A. I. 1995. “Quality Control for European Regulation.” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2 (4): 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X9500200402.
  • Olson, M. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Oreskes, N., and E. M. Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco to Climate Change. London/New York: Bloomsbury Press.
  • RECIPES Project. 2022. “Guidance on the Application of the Precautionary Principle in the EU.” https://recipes-project.eu/results/guidance-future-application-precautionary-principle.html
  • Slovic, P., B. Fischoff, and S. Lichenstein. 2000. “Rating the Risks.” In The Perception of Risk, edited by P. Slovic, 104–110. London: Earthscan Publications.
  • Sunstein, C. R. 2003. “Beyond the Precautionary Principle.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 (3): 1003–1058. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312884.
  • Wong, C. M. L., and S. Lockie. 2018. “Sociology, Risk and the Environment: A Material-Semiotic Approach.” Journal of Risk Research 21 (9): 1077–1092. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1422783.