Exploring primary school CLIL perceptions in Catalonia: students', teachers' and parents' opinions and expectations

References

• Aguilar, M., and R. Rodríguez. 2012. “Lecturer and Student Perception on CLIL at a Spanish University.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15 (2): 183–197. doi:10.1080/13670050.2011.615906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnet, A. 2012. “Towards An Evidence Base for CLIL. How to Integrate Qualitative and Quantitative as well as Process, Product and Participant Perspectives in CLIL Research.” International CLIL Research Journal 4 (1): 66–78.
   Google Scholar
• Coonan, C. M. 2007. “Insider Views of the CLIL Class Through Teacher Self-observation Introspection.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10 (5): 625–646.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2007. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a Connected Research Agenda for CLIL Pedagogies.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10 (5): 543–562.
   Google Scholar
• Czura, A., K. Papaja, and M. Urbaniak. 2009. “Bilingual Education and the Emergence of CLIL in Poland.” In CLIL Practice: Perspectives From the Field, edited by D. Marsh, P. Mehisto, D. Wolff, R. Aliaga, T. Asikainen, M. J. Frigols-Martín, S. Hughes, and G. Langé, 172–178. Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2011. “Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles?” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 182–204. doi:10.1017/S0267190511000092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., and U. Smit, eds. 2007. Empirical Perspectives on CLIL Classroom Discourse. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• De Graaff, R., G. J. Koopman, Y. Anikina, and G. Westhoff. 2007. “An Observation Tool for Effective L2 Pedagogy in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10 (5): 603–624.
   Google Scholar
• Doiz, A., D. Lasagabaster, and J. M. Sierra. 2011. “Internationalisation, Multilingualism and English-medium Instruction.” World Englishes 30 (3): 345–359. doi:10.1111/j.1467-971X.2011.01718.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echevarría, J., M. E. Vogt, and D. J. Short. 2010. Making Content Comprehensible for Secondary English Learners. The SIOP Model. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Feixas, M., E. Codó, D. Couso, M. Espinet, and D. Masats. 2009. Enseñar en inglés en la Universidad. Reflexiones del alumnado y el profesorado en torno a dos experiencias AICLE [Teaching in English at University. Students' and Lecturers' Reflections on Two CLIL Experiences]. In Investigar desde un Contexto Educativo Innovador, edited by R. Roig, J. Blasco, M. A. Cano, R. Gilar, A. Lledó, and C. Mañas, 137–154. Alicante: Editorial Marfil.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Fontecha, A. 2009. “Spanish CLIL: Research and Official Actions.” In Content and Language Integrated Learning. Evidence from Research in Europe, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe and R. M. Jiménez Catalán, 3–21. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, R., and A. Halbach. 2011. “Analysing the Situation of Teachers in the Madrid Bilingual Project after Four Years of Implementation.” In Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning. Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. M. Sierra, and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 241–270. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Florit, C. 2010. Caracterització de les pràctiques docents en AICLE: una recerca en acció per a un ensenyament-aprenentatge integrat de continguts i llengua estrangera més efectiu [Characterisation of CLIL Teaching Practices: Action Research for a more Effective Content and Language Integrated Teaching-learning]. Pràctica Docent Efectiva AICLE. Llicència A. Accessed March 10. http://www.xtec.cat/sgfp/llicencies/200910/memories/2052/pdeaicle.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Halbach, A. 2009. “The Primary School Teacher and the Challenges of Bilingual Education.” In CLIL Across Educational Levels: Experiences from Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Contexts, edited by E. Dafouz, 19–26. Madrid: Santillana.
   Google Scholar
• Hüttner, J., and A. Rieder-Bünemann. 2010. “A Cross-sectional Analysis of Oral Narratives by Children with CLIL and Non-CLIL Instruction.” In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, edited by C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, and U. Smit, 61–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D., G. Benvenuto, and E. Lastrucci. 2009. “The Effects of CLIL from the Perspective of Experienced Teachers.” In CLIL Practice: Perspectives from the Field, edited by D. Marsh, P. Mehisto, D. Wolff, R. Aliaga, T. Asikainen, M. J. Frigols-Martín, S. Hughes, and G. Langé, 156–163. Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Jexenflicker, S., and C. Dalton-Puffer. 2010. “The CLIL Differential: Comparing the Writing of CLIL and Non-CLIL Students in Higher Colleges of Technology.” In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, edited by C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, and U. Smit, 169–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez Catalán, R. M., and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe. 2009. “The Receptive Vocabulary of EFL Learners in Two Instructional Contexts: CLIL Versus Non-CLIL Instruction.” In Content and Language Integrated Learning. Evidence from Research in Europe, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe and R. M. Jiménez Catalán, 81–92. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe. 2010. “Ways Forward in CLIL: Provision Issues and Future Planning.” In CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training, edited by D. Lasagabaster and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, 278–295. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Massler, U. 2012. “Primary CLIL and Its Stakeholders: What Children, Parents and Teachers Think of the Potential Merits and Pitfalls of CLIL Modules in Primary Teaching.” International CLIL Research Journal 1 (4): 36–46.
   Google Scholar
• Massler, U., and C. Steiert. 2010. “Implementierung von CLIL-Modulen – die Perspektive von Lehrenden, Kindern, Eltern [Implementation of CLIL Modules: The Perspective of Teachers, Children and Parents].” In CLIL und Immersion: Fremdsprachlicher Sachfachunterricht in der Grundschule, edited by U. Massler and P. Burmeister, 11–29. Braunschweig: Westermann.
   Google Scholar
• Mehisto, P., D. Marsh, and M. J. Frigols. 2008. Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning and Multilingual Education. Oxford: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mehisto, P., and H. Asser. 2007. “Stakeholder Perspectives: CLIL Programme Management in Estonia.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10 (5): 683–701.
   Google Scholar
• Navés, T., and M. Victori. 2010. “CLIL in Catalonia. An Overview of Research Studies.” In CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe and D. Lasagabaster, 30–54. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M. L. 2012. “CLIL Research in Europe: Past, Present and Future.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15 (3): 315–341. doi:10.1080/13670050.2011.630064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Vidal, C. 2007. “The Need for Focus on Form (FoF) in Content and Language Integrated Approaches: An Exploratory Study.” In Models and Practices in CLIL, edited by F. Lorenzo, S. Casal, V. de Alba, and F. Moore, 39–54. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada (RESLA).
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. 2011. “Which Language Competencies Benefit from CLIL? An Insight into Applied Linguistics Research.” In Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning. Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. M. Sierra, and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 129–153. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra, J. M., F. Gallardo del Puerto, and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe. 2011. “Good Practices and Future Actions in CLIL: Learning and Pedagogy.” In Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning. Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. M. Sierra, and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 317–338. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ullmann, M. 1999. “History and Geography through French: CLIL in a UK Secondary School.” In Learning through a Foreign Language. Models, Methods and Outcomes, edited by J. Masih, 96–105. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesemes, R. 2009. “Developing Theories of Practices in CLIL: CLIL as Post-method Pedagogies?” In Content and Language Integrated Learning. Evidence from Research in Europe, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe and R. M. Jiménez Catalán, 41–59. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar