Linguistic challenges in the mathematical register for EFL learners: linguistic and multimodal strategies to help learners tackle mathematics word problems

References

• Chapman, A. 1995. “Intertextuality in School Mathematics: The Case of Functions.” Linguistics and Education 7 (3): 243–262. doi:10.1016/0898-5898(95)90025-X.
   Google Scholar
• Cirillo, M., K. R. Bruna, and B. Herbel-Eisenmann. 2010. “Acquisition of Mathematical Language: Suggestions and Activities for English Language Learners.” Multicultural Perspectives 12 (1): 34–41. doi:10.1080/15210961003641385.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1993. “Some Grammatical Problems in Scientific English.” In Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power, edited by M. A. K. Halliday and J. R. Martin, 69–85. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khisty, L. L. 1995. “Making Inequality: Issues of Language and Meanings in Mathematics Teaching with Hispanic Students.” In New Directions for Equity in Mathematics Education, edited by W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, and L. B. Adajian, 279–297. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. 2003. “Mathematics in the Middle: Measure, Picture, Gesture, Sign, and Word.” In Educational Perspectives on Mathematics as Semiosis: From Thinking to Interpreting to Knowing, edited by M. Anderson, A. Saenz-Ludlow, S. Zellweger, and V. V. Cifarelli, 215–234. Brooklyn, NY: Legas.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, M., R. Low, and J. Sweller. 1997. “Learning from Equations or Words.” Instructional Science 25 (1): 37–70. doi:10.1023/A:1002969618881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, M. 2002. “Using Words to Explain Mathematical Ideas.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 25 (1): 78–88.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. 2004. Writing Mathematically: The Discourse of Investigation. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nation. I. S. P. 1990. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L. 1999. “Towards a Systemic Functional Analysis of Multisemiotic Mathematics Texts.” Semiotica 124 (1–2): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L. 2000. “Classroom Discourse in Mathematics: A Multisemiotic Analysis.” Linguistics and Education 10 (3): 359–388.
   Google Scholar
• Pimm, D. 1987. Speaking Mathematically: Communication in Mathematics Classrooms. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, K. 2009. Math Instruction of English Learners. Accessed April 14. http://www.colorincolorado.org/article/30570.
   Google Scholar
• Ron, P. 1999. “Spanish-English Language Issues in the Mathematics Classroom.” In Changing the Faces of Mathematics: Perspectives on Latinos, edited by L. Ortiz-Franco, N. G. Hernandez, and Y. de la Cruz, 23–34. Reston, VA: National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, R. N., and D. R. Thompson. 2001. “Learning Mathematical Symbolism: Challenges and Instructional Strategies.” The Mathematics Teacher 94 (4): 265–271.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. 2007. “The Linguistic Challenges of Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Research Review.” Reading and Writing Quarterly 23 (2): 139–159. doi:10.1080/10573560601158461.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. 2000. Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. 2007. “Current Perspectives on Vocabulary Teaching and Learning.” In International Handbook of English Language Teaching, edited by J. Cummins and C. Davison, 827–840. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., and C. B. Zimmerman. 2002. “Derivative Word Forms: What Do Learners Know?” TESOL Quarterly 36 (2): 145–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A., and I. Lavie. 2005. “Why Cannot Children See as the Same What Grown-ups Cannot See as Different?—Early Numerical Thinking Revisited.” Cognition and Instruction 23 (2): 237–309. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2302_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usiskin, Z. 1996. “Mathematics as a Language.” In Communication in Mathematics, K–12 and beyond, edited by P. Elliot and M. Kenney, 231–243. Reston: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Veel, R. 1999. “Language, Knowledge and Authority in School Mathematics.” In Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness: Linguistic and Social Processes, edited by F. Christie, 185–216. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, M. L., and N. F. Ellerton. 2004. “Language Genre and School Mathematics.” Paper presented at the Topic Study Group 25 at International Congress of Mathematics Education-10, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, T. W., and M. S. Wong. 2009a. New Century Mathematics 1A. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press (China).
   Google Scholar
• Wong, T. W., and M. S. Wong. 2009b. New Century Mathematics 2A. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press (China).
   Google Scholar
• Wong, T. W., and M. S. Wong. 2009c. New Century Mathematics 3A. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press (China).
   Google Scholar