Convergence in the domains of static spatial relations and events of putting and taking. Evidence from bilingual speakers of Romansh and German

References

• Alferink, I., and M. Gullberg. 2014. “French–Dutch Bilinguals Do Not Maintain Obligatory Semantic Distinctions: Evidence from Placement Verbs.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17 (1): 22–37. doi:10.1017/S136672891300028X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameel, E., G. Storms, B. C. Malt, and S. A. Sloman. 2005. “How Bilinguals Solve the Naming Problem.” Journal of Memory and Language 53 (1): 60–80. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthele, R. 2006. Ort und Weg. Eine Vergleichende Untersuchung der Sprachlichen Raumreferenz in Varietäten des Deutschen, Rätoromanischen und Französischen [Place and Path. A Comparative Investigation of Spatial Language in Varieties of German, Romansh and French]. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Berthele, R. 2007. “Contact de Langues et Conceptualisations Spatiales. Aspects de la Sémantique et de la Grammaire de la Référence Spatiale en Sursilvan, Vallader et Surmiran [Language Contact and Spatial Conceptualization. Aspects of Spatial Semantics and Grammar in Sursilvan, Vallader and Surmiran].” Vox Romanica 66: 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Berthele, R. 2012. “On the Use of PUT Verbs by Multilingual Speakers of Romansh.” In Events of “Putting” and “Taking”: A Crosslinguistic Perspective, edited by A. Kopecka and B. Narasimhan, 145–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Berthele, R. 2013. “Disentangling Manner and Path: Evidence from Varieties of German and Romance.” In Variation and Change in the Coding of Motion Events, edited by J. Goschler and A. Stefanowitsch, 55–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, B. E., and A. J. Toribio. 2004. “Introduction: Convergence as an Emergent Property in Bilingual Speech.” Bilingualism Language and Cognition 7 (2): 91–93. doi:10.1017/S1366728904001506.
   Google Scholar
• Cathomas, R. 2005. Schule und Zweisprachigkeit. Immersiver Unterricht: Internationaler Forschungsstand und Eine Empirische Untersuchung am Beispiel des Rätoromanisch-deutschen Schulmodells [School and Bilingualism. Immersion Schools: State of the Art and an Empirical Investigation in Romansh-German Schools]. Münster: Waxman.
   Google Scholar
• Clyne, M. 2003. Dynamics of Language Contact. English and Immigrant Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coray, R. 2009. “Stai si, Defenda, tiu Code Funczional! Rumantsch Grischun im Öffentlichen Diskurs [Stand Up and Defend your Functional Code! Rumantsch Grischun in the Public Discourse].” Bündner Monatsblatt 1: 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. 2003. The Native Speaker: Myth and Reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, A. M. B. 2002. “Lexical Representation and Lexical Processing in the L2 User.” In Portraits of the L2 User, edited by V. Cook, 29–64. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ervin, S. M., and C. E. Osgood. 1954. “Second Language Learning and Bilingualism.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58: 139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Grosjean, F. 1985. “The Bilingual as a Competent but Specific Speaker-hearer.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 6 (6): 467–477. doi:10.1080/01434632.1985.9994221.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S. 2000. “Methodological Rigor in the Study of Transfer: Identifying L1 Influence in the Interlanguage Lexicon.” Language Learning 50 (2): 245–309. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopecka, A., and B. Narasimhan. 2012. Events of “Putting” and “Taking”: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, J. F., and E. Stewart. 1994. “Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections between Bilingual Memory Representations.” Journal of Memory and Language 33 (2): 149–174. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmens, M. 2007. “Caused Posture: Experiential Patterns Emerging from Corpus Research.” In Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis, edited by S. T. Gries and A. Stefanowitsch, 261–296. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Levenshtein, V. I. 1966. “Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions, and Reversals.” Soviet Physics Doklady 10 (8): 707–710.
   Google Scholar
• Liver, R. 1999. Rätoromanisch. Eine Einführung in das Bündnerromanische [Rheto-Romance. An Introduction]. Tübingen: Narr.
   Google Scholar
• Liver, R. 2000. “Das Bündnerromanische [Romansh in Graubünden].” In Die Viersprachige Schweiz, edited by R. Schläpfer and H. Bickel, 211–234. Aarau: Sauerländer.
   Google Scholar
• Majid, A. 2004. Field Manual: Volume 9. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Language & Cognition Group.
   Google Scholar
• Matras, Y. 2009. Language Contact. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matras, Y., and J. Sakel. 2007. Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-linguistic Perspective. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Muysken, P. C. 2000. Bilingual Speech: A Typology of Code-mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ochsenbauer, A.-K., and H. Engemann. 2011. “The Impact of Typological Factors in Monolingual and Bilingual First Language Acquisition: Caused Motion Expressions in English and French.” Language, Interaction et Acquisition [Language, Interaction and Acquisition] 2 (1): 101–128. doi:10.1075/lia.2.1.05och.
   Google Scholar
• Odlin, T. 1989. Language Transfer: Cross-linguistic Influence in Language Learning. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Odlin, T. 2003. “Cross-linguistic Influence.” In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, edited by C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long, 436–486. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlenko, A. 2009. The Bilingual Mental Lexicon: Interdisciplinary Approaches, Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlenko, A. 2011a. “Introduction: Bilingualism and Thought in the 20th Century. In Thinking and Speaking in Two Languages, edited by A. Pavlenko, 1–28. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlenko, A. 2011b. Thinking and Speaking in Two Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Seuren, P., and H. Wekker. 1986. “Semantic Transparency as a Factor in Creole Genesis.” In Substrata versus Universals in Creole Genesis: Papers from the Amsterdam Creole Workshop, April 1985, edited by P. Muysken and N. Smith, 57–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. 1987. “Thinking for Speaking.” Proceedings of the Thirteenth Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 13: 335–345.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. 1996. “From ‘Thought and Language’ to ‘Thinking for Speaking’.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, edited by J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. 2004. “The Many Ways to Search for a Frog: Linguistic Typology and the Expression of Motion Events.” In Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, edited by S. Strömqvist and L. Verhoeven, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. 2006. “What Makes Manner of Motion Salient? Explorations in Linguistic Typology, Discourse, and Cognition.” In Space in Languages. Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, edited by M. Hickmann and S. Robert, 59–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tessarolo, M., and G. P. Pedrotti. 2009. “Languages in the Canton of Grisons.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 199: 63–88. doi:10.1515/ijsl.2009.035.
   Google Scholar
• Toribio, A. J. 2004. “Convergence as an Optimization Strategy in Bilingual Speech: Evidence from Code-switching.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7 (2): 165–173. doi:10.1017/S1366728904001476.
   Google Scholar
• Treffers-Daller, J., and R. Mougeon. 2005. “The Role of Transfer in Language Variation and Change: Evidence from Contact Varieties of French.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8 (2): 93–98. doi:10.1017/S1366728905002191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreich, U. 1953. Languages in Contact. Findings and Problems. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Weinreich, U. 2011. Languages in Contact: French, German and Romansch in Twentieth-century Switzerland. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• White, L. 1991. “Second Language Competence versus Second Language Performance: UG or Processing Strategies?” In Point Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the Second Language, edited by L. Eubank, 167–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar