Analysing students’ content-learning in science in CLIL vs. non-CLIL programmes: empirical evidence from Spain

References

• Admiraal, W., G. Westhoff, and K. de Bot. 2006. “Evaluation of Bilingual Secondary Education in the Netherlands: Students’ Language Proficiency in English.” Educational Research and Evaluation 12 (1): 75–93. doi: 10.1080/13803610500392160
   Google Scholar
• Alejo, R., and A. Piquer-Píriz. 2016. “Urban vs. Rural CLIL: An Analysis of Input-related Variables, Motivation and Language Attainment.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 8318: 1–18. doi:10.1080/07908318.2016.1154068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, E., J. Grisaleña, and A. Campo. 2008. “Plurilingual Education in Secondary Schools: Analysis of Results.” International CLIL Research Journal 1 (1): 36–49.
   Google Scholar
• Baetens Beardsmore, H. 1990. “Multilingual Education in Europe: Theory and Practice.” In Korean Language Education in China, 107–129. Seoul: The Korean Society of Bilingualism.
   Google Scholar
• Baetens Beardsmore, H., and M. Swain. 1985. “Designing Bilingual Education: Aspects of Immersion and European School Models.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 6: 1–15. doi:10.1080/01434632.1985.9994181.
   Google Scholar
• Bergroth, M. 2006. “Immersion Students in the Matriculation Examination Three Years After Immersion.” In Exploring Dual-focussed Education. Integrating Language and Content for Individual and Societal Needs, edited by S. Björklund, K. Mard-Miettinen, M. Bergström, and M. Södergard, 123–134. Vaasa: University of Vaasa, Centre for Immersion and Multilingualism. http://www.uwasa.fi/materiaali/pdf/isbn_952-476-149-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2011. “Is CLIL so Beneficial, or Just Selective? Re-evaluating Some of the Research.” System 39 (4): 523–532. doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2013. “CLIL: Some of the Reasons Why … and why not.” System 41: 587–597. doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2015. “CLIL: Detail Matters in the Whole Picture. More than a Reply to J. Hüttner and U. Smit (2014).” System 53: 119–128. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casal, S., and P. Moore. 2009. “The Andalusian Bilingual Sections Scheme: Evaluation and Consultancy.” International CLIL Research Journal 1 (2): 36–46.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J. 2009. Towards Multilingual Education: Basque Educational Research in International Perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J. 2013. “Discussion: Towards an Educational Perspective in CLIL Language Policy and Pedagogical Practice.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16: 389–394. doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.777392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J. 2015. “Content-based Instruction and Content and Language Integrated Learning: The Same or Different?” Language, Culture & Curriculum 28 (1): 8–24. doi:10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., F. Genesee, and D. Gorter. 2014. “Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” Applied Linguistics 35 (3): 243–262. doi:10.1093/applin/amt011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe. 2015. “Learning through a Second or Additional Language: Content-based Instruction and CLIL in the Twenty-first Century.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 28 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1080/07908318.2014.1000921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2002. “Relevance of CLIL to the European Commission's Language Learning Objectives.” In CLIL / EMILE - The European Dimension: Actions, Trends, and Foresight Potential, edited by David Marsh, 27–28. DG Education & Culture, European Commision. University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., P. Hood, and D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. 2008. “BICS and CALP: Empirical and Theoretical Status of the Distinction.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education: Vol. 2. Literacy, edited by B. Street, and N. H. Hornberger, 71–83. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dafouz, E., and M. Guerrini, eds. 2009. CLIL Across Educational Levels. Experiences from Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Contexts. Madrid: Santillana.
   Google Scholar
• Dalrymple-Smith, A., V. Karagiannakis, and K. Papadopoulos. 2012. “Does International Education Risk the Development of Students’ Mother Tongues? An Investigation into Language use in Mathematics Classrooms.” Masters’ Thesis. Utrecht University. http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/281151.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2008. “Outcomes and Processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Current Research from Europe.” Future Perspectives for English Language Teaching May: 139–157. http://www.univie.ac.at/Anglistik/Dalton/SEW07/CLILresearchoverviewarticle.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., and T. Nikula. 2006. “Introduction.” Vienna English Working Papers 15 (3): 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaff, R., G. J. Koopman, Y. Anikina, and G. Westhoff. 2007. “An Observation Tool for Effective L2 Pedagogy in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10 (5): 603–624. doi:10.2167/beb462.0.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar Urmeneta, C. 2001. “Los Programas de Aprendizaje Integrado de Contenidos Curriculares y Lengua [Content and Language Integrated Programmes].” In Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras en la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria [Foreign Language Teaching in Compulsory Secondary Education], edited by L. Nussbaum and M. Bernaus, 229–232. Madrid: Síntesis.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar Urmeneta, C. 2013. “Learning to Become a CLIL Teacher: Teaching, Reflection and Professional Development.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16 (3): 334–353. doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.777389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar Urmeneta, C., and A. Sánchez Sola. 2009. “Language Learning through Tasks in a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Science Classroom.” Porta Linguarum 11: 65–83. http://www.ugr.es/~portalin/articulos/PL_numero11/4%20C%20Escobar_A%20Sanchez.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012a. “Europeans and their Languages. Special Eurobarometre 386.” Accessed September 12, 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. 2006. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. 2012. “Key Data on Teaching Languages at School in Europe.” Accessed September 12, 2016. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/key_data_series/143EN_HI.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Fontecha, A. 2009. “Spanish CLIL: Research and Official Actions.” In Content and Language Integrated Learning. Evidence from Research in Europe, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, and R. M. Jiménez Catalán, 3–21. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Fortanet Gómez, I., and M. F. Ruiz-Garrido. 2009. “Sharing CLIL in Europe.” In Content and Language Integrated Learning: Cultural Diversity, edited by M. L. Carrió-Pastor, 47–75. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gajo, L. 2007. “Linguistic Knowledge and Subject Knowledge: How does Bilingualism Contribute to Subject Development?” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10 (5): 563–581. doi:10.2167/beb460.0.
   Google Scholar
• Grandinetti, M., M. Langellotti, and Y. L. Ting. 2013. “How CLIL can Provide a Pragmatic Means to Renovate Science Education Even in a Sub-optimally Bilingual Context?” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16 (3): 354–374. doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.777390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbach, A. 2008. “Bilingual Methodology in Primary Schools.” Revista de Educación 346: 455–466. http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2591989&info=resumen&idioma=ENG.
   Google Scholar
• Ianos, A., Huguet, A., Janés, J., and C. Lapresta. 2016. “Can Language Attitudes be Improved? A Longitudinal Study of Immigrant Students in Catalonia (Spain).” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. doi:10.1080/13670050.2015.1051508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäppinen, A. K. 2005. “Thinking and Content Learning of Mathematics and Science as Cognitional Development in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Teaching through a Foreign Language in Finland.” Language and Education 19 (2): 147–168. doi:10.1080/09500780508668671.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez Catalán, R. M., and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe. 2007. “Does the Type of Instruction Have any Bearing on EFL Learners’ Receptive Vocabulary?” Paper presented at the ELIA 10 conference. Issues in teaching, learning, and using vocabulary in an L2, University of Seville, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. 2008. “Foreign Language Competence in Content and Language Integrated Courses.” The Open Applied Linguistics Journal 1: 30–41. doi:10.2174/1874913500801010030.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., and A. Doiz. 2016. “CLIL Students’ Perceptions of their Language Learning Process: Delving into Self-perceived Improvement and Instructional Preferences.” Language Awareness 25 (1–2): 110–126. doi:10.1080/09658416.2015.1122019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, eds. 2010. CLIL in Spain. Implementation, Results and Teacher Training. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., and J. M. Sierra. 2010. “Immersion and CLIL in English: More Differences than Similarities.” ELT Journal 64 (4): 367–375. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccp082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llinares, A. 2015. “Integration in CLIL: A Proposal to Inform Research and Successful Pedagogy.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 28 (1): 58–73. doi:10.1080/07908318.2014.1000925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F. 2007. “The Sociolinguistics of CLIL: Language Planning and Language Change in 21st Century Europe.” Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada (RESLA) 1: 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F., S. Casal, and P. Moore. 2010. “The Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in European Education: Key Findings from the Andalusian Bilingual Sections Evaluation Project.” Applied Linguistics 31 (3): 418–442. doi:10.1093/applin/amp041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid, D., and S. Hughes, eds. 2011. Studies in Bilingual Education. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 2002. CLIL/EMILE-the European Dimension: Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential. Strasbourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, O., D. Coyle, A. Halbach, K. Schuck, and T. Ting. 2015. “A Pluriliteracies Approach to Content and Language Integrated Learning – Mapping Learner Progressions in Knowledge Construction and Meaning-making.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 28 (1): 41–57. doi: 10.1080/07908318.2014.1000924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan, B., C. Leung, and T. Slater. 2010. “Assessing Language and Content: A Functional Perspective.” In Testing the Untestable in Language Education, edited by A. Paran, and S. Lies, 217–240. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, C. 2007. “CLIL: Some Thoughts on its Psycholinguistic Principles.” Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada (RESLA) 1: 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Navés, T., and M. Victori. 2010. “CLIL in Catalonia: An Overview of Research Studies.” In CLIL in Spain. Implementation, Results and Teacher Training, edited by D. Lasagabaster, and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, 30–54. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Paran, A. 2013. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: Panacea or Policy Borrowing Myth?” Applied Linguistics Review 4 (2): 317–342. doi:10.1515/applirev-2013-0014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavón Vázquez, V., and F. Rubio. 2010. “Teachers’ Concerns and Uncertainties about the Introduction of CLIL Programmes.” Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Didáctica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras 14: 45–58. http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3253054.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M. L. 2012. “CLIL Research in Europe: Past, Present, and Future.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15 (3): 315–341. doi:10.1080/13670050.2011.630064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M. L. 2016. “From the CLIL Craze to the CLIL Conundrum: Addressing the Current CLIL Controversy.” Bellaterra Journal of Teaching Language and Literature 9 (1): 9–31. doi:10.5565/rev/jtl3.667.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Vidal, C. 2011. “Language Acquisition in Three Different Contexts of Learning: Formal Instruction, Stay Abroad, and Semi-immersion (CLIL).” In Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning. Contributions to Multilingualism in European Context, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. M. Sierra, and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 103–127. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Vidal, C., and M. Juan-Garau. 2010. “To CLIL or not to CLIL? From Bilingualism to Multilingualism in Catalan/Spanish Communities in Spain.” In CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training, edited by D. Lasagabaster, and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, 115–138. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson, R. 2003. English-only Europe? Challenging Language Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roquet, H., and C. Pérez-Vidal. 2015. “Do Productive Skills Improve in Content and Language Integrated Learning Contexts? The Case of Writing.” Applied Linguistics 2015: 1–24. doi:10.1093/applin/amv050.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. 2008. “CLIL and Foreign Language Learning: A Longitudinal Study in the Basque Country.” International CLIL Research Journal 1 (1): 60–73. http://www.icrj.eu/11/article5.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., and J. Cenoz. 2015. “Way Forward in the Twenty-first Century in Content-based Instruction: Moving Towards Integration.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 28 (1): 90–96. doi:10.1080/07908318.2014.1000927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., and R. M. Jiménez Catalán, eds. 2009. Content and Language Integrated Learning. Evidence from Research in Europe. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Seidlhofer, B. 2004. “Research Perspectives on Teaching English as a Lingua Franca.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24: 209–239. doi: 10.1017/S0267190504000145
   Google Scholar
• Serra, C. 2007. “Assessing CLIL at Primary School: A Longitudinal Study.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10 (5): 582–602. doi:10.2167/beb461.0.
   Google Scholar
• Stehler, U. 2006. “The Acquisition of Knowledge in Bilingual Learning: An Empirical Study on the Role of Language in Content Learning.” Vienna English Working Papers 15 (3): 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ullmann, M. 1999. “History and Geography through French: CLIL in a UK Secondary School.” In Learning through a Foreign Language. Models, Methods and Outcomes, edited by J. Masih, 96–105. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wode, H. 1999. “Language Learning in European Immersion Classes.” In Learning through a Foreign Language. Models, Methods and Outcomes, edited by J. Masih, 16–25. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Xanthou, M. 2011. “The Impact of CLIL on L2 Vocabulary Development and Content Knowledge.” English Teaching: Practique and Critique 10 (4): 116–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar