1,213
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Collaborations between language and content university instructors: factors and indicators of positive partnerships

ORCID Icon
Pages 591-606 | Received 01 Feb 2018, Accepted 31 May 2018, Published online: 12 Jul 2018

References

  • Arkoudis, S. 2006. “Negotiating the Rough Ground between ESL and Mainstream Teachers.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9 (4): 415–433. doi:10.2167/beb337.0.
  • Arkoudis, S., C. Baik, and S. Richardson. 2012. English Language Standards in Higher Education: From Entry to Exit. Victoria: ACER Press.
  • Babbitt, M., and R. Mlynarczyk. 2000. “Keys to Successful Content-based Programs: Administrative Perspectives.” In Content-based College ESL Instruction, edited by Kasper Gabrielle, 26–47. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
  • Baik, C., and J. Greig. 2009. “Improving the Academic Outcomes of Undergraduate ESL Students: The Case for Discipline-based Academic Skills Programs.” Higher Education Research & Development 28 (4): 401–416. doi:10.1080/07294360903067005.
  • Basturkmen, H., and N. Shackleford. 2015. “How Content Lecturers Help Students with Language: An Observational Study of Language-related Episodes in Interaction in First Year Accounting Classrooms.” English for Specific Purposes 37: 87–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.08.001.
  • Creese, A. 2002. “The Discursive Construction of Power in Teacher Partnerships: Language and Subject Specialists in Mainstream Schools.” TESOL Quarterly 36 (4): 597–616. doi:10.2307/3588242.
  • Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Jogn Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • D’Amour, D. 1997. “Structuration de la collaboration interprofessionnelle dans les services de sante de premiere ligne au Quebec.” PhD diss., University of Montreal.
  • Davison, C. 2006. “Collaboration between ESL and Content Teachers: How Do We Know When We Are Doing It Right?” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9 (4): 454–475. doi:10.2167/beb339.0.
  • Dudley-Evans, T. 2001. “Team-teaching.” In EAP: Changes and Adaptations in the Birmingham Approach. In Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes, edited by J. Flowerdew, and M. Peacock, 225–238. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dudley-Evans, T., and M. J. St John. 1998. Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-disciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Duff, P. 2008. Case Study Research in Applied Linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
  • Flowerdew, J., and T. Costley, eds. 2016. Discipline-specific Writing: Theory into Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Goldstein, L. 2017. “Looking Back and Looking Forward at the Adjunct Model: Are We Still Smiling Through the Turbulence?.” In The Content-based Classroom: New Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content, edited by M. A. Snow, and D. Brinton, 337–351. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Goldstein, L., C. Campbell, and M. Cummings. 1997. “Smiling Through the Turbulence: The Flight Attendance Syndrome and Writing Instructor Status in the Adjunct Model.” In The Content-based Classroom: Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content, edited by M. A. Snow, and D. Brinton, 331–339. White Plains, NW: Longman.
  • Greere, A., and A. Räsänen. 2008. “Lanqua Subproject on Content and Language Integrated Learning: Year One Report.” www.lanqua.eu/sites/default/files/Year1Report_CLIL_ForUpload … 0/index.pdf.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. London: E. Arnold.
  • Hyland, K. 2002. “Specificity Revisited: How Far Should We Go Now?” English for Specific Purposes 21 (4): 385–395. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00028-X.
  • Hyland, K. 2004. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
  • Jacobs, C. 2007. “Towards a Critical Understanding of the Teaching of Discipline-specific Academic Literacies: Making the Tacit Explicit.” Journal of Education 41 (1): 59–81.
  • Jacobs, C. 2010. “Collaboration as Pedagogy: Consequences and Implications for Partnerships between Communication and Disciplinary Specialists.” Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 28 (3): 227–237. doi:10.2989/16073614.2010.545025.
  • James, M. A. 2006. “Transfer of Learning from a University Content-Based EAP Course.” TESOL Quarterly 40 (4): 783–806. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40264308.
  • Jones, J., H. Bonanno, and K. Scouller. 2001. “Staff and Student Roles in Central and Faculty-based Learning Support: Changing Partnerships.” In Proceedings of the 2001 LAS Conference, Changing Identities: Language and Academic Skills Advisors. Wollongong: University of Wollongong.
  • Kennelly, R., A. Maldoni, and D. Davies. 2010. “A Case Study: Do Discipline-based Programmes Improve Student Learning Outcomes?” International Journal for Educational Integrity 6 (1): 61–73.
  • Leopold, L. 2010. “Teaching Writing within the Disciplines: A Viable Approach for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Instructors.” CATESOL Journal 22 (1): 167–188.
  • Llinares, A. 2015. “Integration in CLIL: A Proposal to Inform Research and Successful Pedagogy.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 28 (1): 58–73. doi:10.1080/07908318.2014.1000925.
  • Llinares, A., and T. Morton, eds. 2017. Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Llinares, A., T. Morton, and R. Whittaker. 2012. The Roles of Language in CLIL. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lyster, R. 2007. Learning and Teaching Languages Through Content: A Counterbalanced Approach. Language Learning and Language Teaching, v. 18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Melles, G., G. Millar, J. Morton, and S. Fegan. 2005. “Credit-based Discipline Specific English for Academic Purposes Programmes in Higher Education: Revitalizing the Profession.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 4 (3): 283–303. doi:10.1177/1474022205056171.
  • Nesi, H., and S. Gardner. 2012. Genres Across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nguyen, T. T., J. Williams, and A. Trimarchi. 2015. “Discipline-specific Language Instruction for International Students in Introductory Economics.” The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6 (3): 7. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol6/iss3/7.
  • Nikula, T., E. Dafouz, P. Moore, and U. Smit, eds. 2016. Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Pawan, F., and M. C. S. Greene. 2017. “In Trust, We Collaborate: ESL and Content-area Teachers Working Together in Content-based Language Instruction.” In The Content-based Classroom: New Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content, edited by M. A. Snow and D. Brinton, 2nd ed., 323–337. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Pawan, F., and J. H. Ortloff. 2011. “Sustaining Collaboration: English-as-a-second-language, and Content-area Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (2): 463–471. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.016.
  • Perry, B., and T. Stewart. 2005. “Insights into Effective Partnership in Interdisciplinary Team Teaching.” System 33 (4): 563–573. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005.01.006.
  • Raimes, A. 1991. “Instructional Balance: From Theories to Practices in the Teaching of Writing.” In Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics, edited by J. E. Alatis, 238–249. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. R., eds. 2017. Content and Language Integrated Learning: Language Policy and Pedagogical Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. R., and J. Cenoz. 2015. “Way Forward in the Twenty-first Century in Content-based Instruction: Moving Towards Integration.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 28 (1): 90–96. doi:10.1080/07908318.2014.1000927.
  • Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. R., and R. M. Jiménez Catalán, eds. 2009. Content and Language Integrated Learning: Evidence from Research in Europe. Second Language Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Saldaña, Johnny. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Sandholtz, Judith Haymore. 2000. “Interdisciplinary Team Teaching as a Form of Professional Development.” Teacher Education Quarterly 27 (3): 39–54. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/23478234.
  • Schleppegrell, M. 2004. The Language of Schooling. A Functional Linguistics Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Snow, M. A., and D. M. Brinton. 1988. “Content-based Language Instruction: Investigating the Effectiveness of the Adjunct Model.” TESOL Quarterly 22 (4): 553–574. doi:10.2307/3587256.
  • Snow, M. A., and D. Brinton, eds. 1997. The Content-based Classroom. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Snow, M. A., and D. Brinton, eds. 2017. The Content-based Classroom: New Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Snow Andrade, M., and J. Harper Makaafi. 2001. “Guidelines for Establishing Adjunct Courses at the University Level.” TESOL Journal Autumn: 34–39.
  • Sztompka, P. 1999. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tan, M. 2011. “Mathematics and Science Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices Regarding the Teaching of Language in Content Learning.” Language Teaching Research 15 (3): 325–342. doi:10.1177/1362168811401153.
  • Trent, J. 2010. “Teacher Identity Construction Across the Curriculum: Promoting Cross-curriculum Collaboration in English-medium Schools.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 30 (2): 167–183. doi:10.1080/02188791003721622.
  • Welsh, A., A. Shaw, and J. A. Fox. 2017. “The Pairing of a Science Communications and a Language Course to Enrich First-year English Language Learners’ Writing and Argumentation Skills.” Journal of College Science Teaching 46 (5): 64–72. doi: 10.2505/4/jcst17_046_05_64

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.