References
- Arkoudis, S. 2006. “Negotiating the Rough Ground between ESL and Mainstream Teachers.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9 (4): 415–433. doi:10.2167/beb337.0.
- Arkoudis, S., C. Baik, and S. Richardson. 2012. English Language Standards in Higher Education: From Entry to Exit. Victoria: ACER Press.
- Babbitt, M., and R. Mlynarczyk. 2000. “Keys to Successful Content-based Programs: Administrative Perspectives.” In Content-based College ESL Instruction, edited by Kasper Gabrielle, 26–47. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
- Baik, C., and J. Greig. 2009. “Improving the Academic Outcomes of Undergraduate ESL Students: The Case for Discipline-based Academic Skills Programs.” Higher Education Research & Development 28 (4): 401–416. doi:10.1080/07294360903067005.
- Basturkmen, H., and N. Shackleford. 2015. “How Content Lecturers Help Students with Language: An Observational Study of Language-related Episodes in Interaction in First Year Accounting Classrooms.” English for Specific Purposes 37: 87–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.08.001.
- Creese, A. 2002. “The Discursive Construction of Power in Teacher Partnerships: Language and Subject Specialists in Mainstream Schools.” TESOL Quarterly 36 (4): 597–616. doi:10.2307/3588242.
- Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Jogn Benjamins Publishing Company.
- D’Amour, D. 1997. “Structuration de la collaboration interprofessionnelle dans les services de sante de premiere ligne au Quebec.” PhD diss., University of Montreal.
- Davison, C. 2006. “Collaboration between ESL and Content Teachers: How Do We Know When We Are Doing It Right?” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9 (4): 454–475. doi:10.2167/beb339.0.
- Dudley-Evans, T. 2001. “Team-teaching.” In EAP: Changes and Adaptations in the Birmingham Approach. In Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes, edited by J. Flowerdew, and M. Peacock, 225–238. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dudley-Evans, T., and M. J. St John. 1998. Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-disciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Duff, P. 2008. Case Study Research in Applied Linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
- Flowerdew, J., and T. Costley, eds. 2016. Discipline-specific Writing: Theory into Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Goldstein, L. 2017. “Looking Back and Looking Forward at the Adjunct Model: Are We Still Smiling Through the Turbulence?.” In The Content-based Classroom: New Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content, edited by M. A. Snow, and D. Brinton, 337–351. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Goldstein, L., C. Campbell, and M. Cummings. 1997. “Smiling Through the Turbulence: The Flight Attendance Syndrome and Writing Instructor Status in the Adjunct Model.” In The Content-based Classroom: Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content, edited by M. A. Snow, and D. Brinton, 331–339. White Plains, NW: Longman.
- Greere, A., and A. Räsänen. 2008. “Lanqua Subproject on Content and Language Integrated Learning: Year One Report.” www.lanqua.eu/sites/default/files/Year1Report_CLIL_ForUpload … 0/index.pdf.
- Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. London: E. Arnold.
- Hyland, K. 2002. “Specificity Revisited: How Far Should We Go Now?” English for Specific Purposes 21 (4): 385–395. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00028-X.
- Hyland, K. 2004. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
- Jacobs, C. 2007. “Towards a Critical Understanding of the Teaching of Discipline-specific Academic Literacies: Making the Tacit Explicit.” Journal of Education 41 (1): 59–81.
- Jacobs, C. 2010. “Collaboration as Pedagogy: Consequences and Implications for Partnerships between Communication and Disciplinary Specialists.” Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 28 (3): 227–237. doi:10.2989/16073614.2010.545025.
- James, M. A. 2006. “Transfer of Learning from a University Content-Based EAP Course.” TESOL Quarterly 40 (4): 783–806. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40264308.
- Jones, J., H. Bonanno, and K. Scouller. 2001. “Staff and Student Roles in Central and Faculty-based Learning Support: Changing Partnerships.” In Proceedings of the 2001 LAS Conference, Changing Identities: Language and Academic Skills Advisors. Wollongong: University of Wollongong.
- Kennelly, R., A. Maldoni, and D. Davies. 2010. “A Case Study: Do Discipline-based Programmes Improve Student Learning Outcomes?” International Journal for Educational Integrity 6 (1): 61–73.
- Leopold, L. 2010. “Teaching Writing within the Disciplines: A Viable Approach for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Instructors.” CATESOL Journal 22 (1): 167–188.
- Llinares, A. 2015. “Integration in CLIL: A Proposal to Inform Research and Successful Pedagogy.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 28 (1): 58–73. doi:10.1080/07908318.2014.1000925.
- Llinares, A., and T. Morton, eds. 2017. Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Llinares, A., T. Morton, and R. Whittaker. 2012. The Roles of Language in CLIL. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Lyster, R. 2007. Learning and Teaching Languages Through Content: A Counterbalanced Approach. Language Learning and Language Teaching, v. 18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Melles, G., G. Millar, J. Morton, and S. Fegan. 2005. “Credit-based Discipline Specific English for Academic Purposes Programmes in Higher Education: Revitalizing the Profession.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 4 (3): 283–303. doi:10.1177/1474022205056171.
- Nesi, H., and S. Gardner. 2012. Genres Across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Nguyen, T. T., J. Williams, and A. Trimarchi. 2015. “Discipline-specific Language Instruction for International Students in Introductory Economics.” The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6 (3): 7. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol6/iss3/7.
- Nikula, T., E. Dafouz, P. Moore, and U. Smit, eds. 2016. Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
- Pawan, F., and M. C. S. Greene. 2017. “In Trust, We Collaborate: ESL and Content-area Teachers Working Together in Content-based Language Instruction.” In The Content-based Classroom: New Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content, edited by M. A. Snow and D. Brinton, 2nd ed., 323–337. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Pawan, F., and J. H. Ortloff. 2011. “Sustaining Collaboration: English-as-a-second-language, and Content-area Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (2): 463–471. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.016.
- Perry, B., and T. Stewart. 2005. “Insights into Effective Partnership in Interdisciplinary Team Teaching.” System 33 (4): 563–573. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005.01.006.
- Raimes, A. 1991. “Instructional Balance: From Theories to Practices in the Teaching of Writing.” In Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics, edited by J. E. Alatis, 238–249. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. R., eds. 2017. Content and Language Integrated Learning: Language Policy and Pedagogical Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. R., and J. Cenoz. 2015. “Way Forward in the Twenty-first Century in Content-based Instruction: Moving Towards Integration.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 28 (1): 90–96. doi:10.1080/07908318.2014.1000927.
- Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. R., and R. M. Jiménez Catalán, eds. 2009. Content and Language Integrated Learning: Evidence from Research in Europe. Second Language Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
- Saldaña, Johnny. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Sandholtz, Judith Haymore. 2000. “Interdisciplinary Team Teaching as a Form of Professional Development.” Teacher Education Quarterly 27 (3): 39–54. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/23478234.
- Schleppegrell, M. 2004. The Language of Schooling. A Functional Linguistics Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Snow, M. A., and D. M. Brinton. 1988. “Content-based Language Instruction: Investigating the Effectiveness of the Adjunct Model.” TESOL Quarterly 22 (4): 553–574. doi:10.2307/3587256.
- Snow, M. A., and D. Brinton, eds. 1997. The Content-based Classroom. White Plains, NY: Longman.
- Snow, M. A., and D. Brinton, eds. 2017. The Content-based Classroom: New Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Snow Andrade, M., and J. Harper Makaafi. 2001. “Guidelines for Establishing Adjunct Courses at the University Level.” TESOL Journal Autumn: 34–39.
- Sztompka, P. 1999. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Tan, M. 2011. “Mathematics and Science Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices Regarding the Teaching of Language in Content Learning.” Language Teaching Research 15 (3): 325–342. doi:10.1177/1362168811401153.
- Trent, J. 2010. “Teacher Identity Construction Across the Curriculum: Promoting Cross-curriculum Collaboration in English-medium Schools.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 30 (2): 167–183. doi:10.1080/02188791003721622.
- Welsh, A., A. Shaw, and J. A. Fox. 2017. “The Pairing of a Science Communications and a Language Course to Enrich First-year English Language Learners’ Writing and Argumentation Skills.” Journal of College Science Teaching 46 (5): 64–72. doi: 10.2505/4/jcst17_046_05_64