Exploring bilingual adolescents’ translanguaging strategies during online reading

References

• Afflerbach, P., and B.-Y. Cho. 2009. “Identifying and Describing Constructively Responsive Comprehension Strategies in New and Traditional Forms of Reading.” In Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, edited by S. E. Israel and G. G. Duffy, 69–90. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Akyel, A., and G. Erçetin. 2009. “Hypermedia Reading Strategies Employed by Advanced Learners of English.” System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics 37 (1): 136–152. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2008.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. J. 2003. “Scrolling, Clicking, and Reading English: Online Reading Strategies in a Second/Foreign Language.” The Reading Matrix 3 (3): 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Androutsopoulos, J. 2015. “Networked Multilingualism: Some Language Practices on Facebook and their Implications.” International Journal of Bilingualism 19 (2): 185–205. doi: 10.1177/1367006913489198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, D., and C. Lee. 2013. Language Online: Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowels, M. A. 2010. The Think-Aloud Controversy in Second Language Research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calero-Breckheimer, A., and E. T. Goetz. 1993. “Reading Strategies of Biliterate Children from English and Spanish Texts.” Reading Psychology 14 (3): 177–204. doi: 10.1080/027027193140301
   Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, A. S., ed. 2012. Literacy as Translingual Practice: Between Communities and Classrooms. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, K. B. 2009. “The Role of Cognitive Flexibility in Reading Comprehension: Past, Present, and Future.” In Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, edited by S. E. Israel, and G. G. Duffy, 115–139. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castek, J., D. J. LeuJr, J. Coiro, M. Gort, L. A. Henry, and C. O. Lima. 2008. “Developing new Literacies among Multilingual Learners in the Elementary Grades.” In Technology-mediated Learning Environments for Young English Learners: Connections In and Out of School, edited by L. L. Parker, 111–154. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, B.-Y. 2014. “Competent Adolescent Readers’ Use of Internet Reading Strategies: A Think-aloud Study.” Cognition and Instruction 32 (3): 253–289. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2014.918133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., and E. Dobler. 2007. “Exploring the Online Reading Comprehension Strategies Used by Sixth-grade Skilled Readers to Search for and Locate Information on the Internet.” Reading Research Quarterly 42 (2): 214–257. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.42.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2014. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crookes, G. 1990. “The Utterance, and Other Basic Units for Second Language Discourse Analysis.” Applied Linguistics 11 (2): 183–199. doi: 10.1093/applin/11.2.183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danet, B., and S. C. Herring, eds. 2007. The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• García, G. E. 1998. “Mexican-American Bilingual Students’ Metacognitive Reading Strategies: What’s Transferred, Unique, Problematic?” National Reading Conference Yearbook 47: 253–263.
   Google Scholar
• García, O. 2009. “Emergent Bilinguals and TESOL: What’s in a Name?” TESOL Quarterly 43 (2): 322–326. doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00172.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, G. E., and H. Godina. 2017. “A Window into Bilingual Reading: The Bilingual Reading Practices of Fourth-grade, Mexican American Children Who are Emergent Bilinguals.” Journal of Literacy Research 49 (2): 273–301. doi: 10.1177/1086296X17703727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, O., and W. Li. 2014. Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hakuta, K., and Y. G. Butler. 2000. How Long Does It Take English Learners to Attain Proficiency? Santa Barbara: The University of California University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, V. B. 2001. “Transfer and Variation in Cognitive Reading Strategies of Latino Fourth-grade Students in a Late-exit Bilingual Program.” Bilingual Research Journal 25 (4): 539–561. doi: 10.1080/15235882.2001.11074466
   Google Scholar
• Hong-Nam, K. 2014. “ELL High School Students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy Use and Reading Proficiency.” TESL-EJ 18 (1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hornberger, N. H. 2004. “The Continua of Biliteracy and the Bilingual Educator: Educational Linguistics in Practice.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 7 (2&3): 155–171. doi: 10.1080/13670050408667806
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H.-C., C.-I. Chern, and C.-C. Lin. 2009. “EFL Learners’ Use of Online Reading Strategies and Comprehension of Texts: An Exploratory Study.” Computers and Education 52 (1): 13–26. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, K. W. 1966. “Recent Measures in Syntactic Development.” Elementary English 43: 732–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez, R. T., G. E. García, and D. Pearson. 1995. “Three Children, Two Languages, and Strategic Reading: Case Studies in Bilingual/Monolingual Reading.” American Educational Research Journal 32 (1): 67–97. doi: 10.3102/00028312032001067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez, R. T., G. E. García, and D. Pearson. 1996. “The Reading Strategies of Bilingual Latina/o Students Who are Successful English Readers: Opportunities and Obstacles.” Reading Research Quarterly 31 (1): 90–112. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.31.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John-Steiner, V. 1985. “The Road to Competence in an Alien Land: A Vygotskian Perspective on Bilingualism.” In Culture Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives, edited by J. V. Wertsch, 348–371. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, S. L., Y. N. Padrón, and H. C. Waxman. 1985. “The Cognitive Reading Strategies of ESL Students.” TESOL Quarterly 19: 789–792. doi: 10.2307/3586677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konishi, M. 2003. “Strategies for Reading Hypertext by Japanese ESL Learners.” The Reading Matrix 3 (3): 97–117.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, B. 1977. “Combining Ideas in Written and Spoken English: A Look at Subordination and Coordination.” In Discourse Across Time and Space, edited by E. Ochs Keenan, and T. L. Bennett, 69–108. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics of the University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, H. J., and D. L. Schallert. 2016. “Understanding Translanguaging Practices Through a Biliteracy Continua Framework: Adult Biliterates’ Reading Academic Texts in their Two Languages.” Bilingual Research Journal 39 (2): 138–151. doi: 10.1080/15235882.2016.1167139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, W. S. E. 2004. “Second Language Socialization in a Bilingual Chat Room: Global and Local Considerations.” Language Learning & Technology 8 (3): 44–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, W. S. E. 2009. “Multiliteracies on Instant Messaging in Negotiating Local, Translocal, and Transnational Affiliations: A Case of an Adolescent Immigrant.” Reading Research Quarterly 44 (4): 377–397. doi:10.1598/RRQ.44.4.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, J. A., L. Bartolome, O. Vasquez, and T. Lucas. 1990. “Meaning Construction in School Literacy Tasks: A Study of Bilingual Students.” American Educational Research Journal 27: 427–471. doi: 10.3102/00028312027003427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. 2017. Multilingualism Online. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, L., and J. S. Caldwell. 2011. Qualitative Reading Inventory. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., C. K. Kinzer, J. Coiro, J. Castek, and L. A. Henry. 2013. “New Literacies: A Dual-level Theory of the Changing Nature of Literacy, Instruction, and Assessment.” In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, edited by D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, and R. B. Ruddell, 6th ed., 1150–1181. Newark: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W. 2018. “Translanguaging as a Practical Theory of Language.” Applied Linguistics 39 (1): 9–30. doi: 10.1093/applin/amx039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSwan, J. 2017. “A Multilingual Perspective on Translanguaging.” American Educational Research Journal 54 (1): 167–201. doi: 10.3102/0002831216683935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padrón, Y. N., S. L. Knight, and H. C. Waxman. 1986. “Analyzing Bilingual and Monolingual Students’ Perceptions of their Reading Strategies.” The Reading Teacher 39: 430–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padrón, Y. N., and H. C. Waxman. 1988. “The Effect of ESL Students’ Perceptions of their Cognitive Strategies on Reading Achievement.” TESOL Quarterly 22 (1): 146–150. doi: 10.2307/3587068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. R., and D. Kim. 2011. “Reading-strategy Use by English as a Second Language Learners in Online Reading Tasks.” Computers and Education 57 (3): 2156–2166. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. R., and D. Kim. 2017. “English Language Learners’ Strategies for Reading Online Texts: Influential Factors and Patterns of Use at Home and in School.” International Journal of Educational Research 82: 63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2017.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, A. 2011. “The Online Reading Strategies Use by Five Successful Taiwanese ESL Learners.” Asian Anthropology 10: 65–87.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., and P. Afflerbach. 1995. Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, R., and S. O’Hara. 2008. “Reading in Spanish and English: A Comparative Study of Processing Strategies.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 51 (8): 630–638. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.51.8.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, Z., P. Y. Gu, L. J. Zhang, and G. Hu. 2007. “Reading Strategies and Approaches to Learning of Bilingual Primary School Pupils.” Language Awareness 16 (4): 243–262. doi: 10.2167/la423.0
   Google Scholar
• Seng, G. H., and F. Hashim. 2006. “Use of L1 in L2 Reading Comprehension among Tertiary ESL Learners.” Reading in a Foreign Language 18 (1): 29–54.
   Google Scholar
• Shang, H.-F. 2016. “Online Metacognitive Strategies, Hypermedia Annotations, and Motivation on Hypertext Comprehension.” Journal of Educational Technology and Society 19 (3): 321–334.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 2006. “Languaging, Agency and Collaboration in Advanced Second Language Proficiency.” In Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, edited by H. Byrnes, 95–108. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Upton, T. A. 1997. “First and Second Language Use in Reading Comprehension Strategies of Japanese ESL Students.” TESL-EJ 3 (1). http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume3/ej09/ej09a3/.
   Google Scholar
• Upton, T. A., and L.-C. Lee-Thompson. 2001. “The Role of The First Language in Second Language Reading.” SSLA 23: 469–495.
   Google Scholar
• Usó-Juan, E., and N. Ruiz-Madrid. 2009. “Reading Printed versus Online Texts: A Study of EFL Learners’ Strategic Reading Behavior.” International Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 59–79.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1986. Thought and Language. Translated, Revised, and Edited by A. Kozulin. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, Y. 2009. “Adolescent Literacy and Identity Construction among 1.5 Generation Students.” Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 19 (1): 100–129. doi: 10.1075/japc.19.1.06yi
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J., P. Y. Gu, and G. Hu. 2008. “A Cognitive Perspective on Singaporean Primary School Pupils’ Use of Reading Strategies in Learning to Read in English.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 78 (2): 245–271. doi: 10.1348/000709907X218179
   PubMedGoogle Scholar