1,707
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Does CLIL shape language attitudes and motivation? Interactions with target languages and instruction levels

, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 534-553 | Received 27 Mar 2019, Accepted 16 Sep 2019, Published online: 03 Nov 2019

References

  • Amengual-Pizzaro, M., and J. I. Prieto-Arranz. 2014. “Exploring Affective Factors in L3 Learning: CLIL vs. Non-CLIL.” In Content-based Language Learning in Multilingual Educational Environments, edited by M. Juan-Garau and J. Salazar-Noguera, 197–220. Berlin: Springer.
  • Baker, C. 1992. Attitudes and Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84 (2): 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
  • Banegas, D. L. 2012. “Motivation and Autonomy Through CLIL. A Collaborative Undertaking.” In Selected Papers From the XXXVII FAAPI Conference, edited by L. Anglada, and D. L. Banegas, 39–45. Bariloche: APIZALS Asociación de Profesores de Inglés de la Zona Andina y Línea Sur.
  • Barron, K. E., and C. S. Hulleman. 2015. “Expectancy-value-cost Model of Motivation.” In International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by J. D. Wright, 2nd ed., Vol. 8, 503–509. Oxford: Elsvier.
  • Bohner, G. 2003. “Attitudes.” In Introduction to Social Psychology. A European Perspective, edited by M. Hewstone, and W. Stroebe, 239–282. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Bruton, A. 2011. “Is CLIL so Beneficial, or Just Selective?” Re-evaluating Some of the Research. System 39 (4): 523–532. doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002.
  • Chambers, G. N. 1999. Motivating Language Learners. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Coonan, C. M. 2012. “Affect and Motivation in CLIL.” In Quality Interfaces: Examining Evidence & Exploring Solutions in CLIL, edited by D. Marsh, and O. Meyer, 53–66. Eichstaett: Eichstaett Academic Press.
  • Coyle, D. 2005. “Developing CLIL: Towards a Theory of Practice.” In CLIL in Catalonia, From Theory to Practice, edited by N. Figueras, 5–29. Barcelona: APAC (Associació de Professors d’Anglès de Catalunya).
  • Dalton-Puffer, C. 2008. “Outcomes and Processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Current Research From Europe.” In Future Perspectives for English Language Teaching, edited by W. Delanoy and L. Volksmann, 139–157. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
  • Davies, J., and I. Brember. 2001. “The Closing gap in Attitudes Between Boys and Girls: A Five Year Longitudinal Study.” Educational Psychology 21 (1): 103–114. doi:10.1080/01443410124899.
  • Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
  • Denman, J., R. Tanner, and R. de Graaff. 2013. “CLIL in Junior Vocational Secondary Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Teaching and Learning.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16 (3): 285–300. doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.777386.
  • De Smet, A. 2012. “L’immersion c’est pour quelqu’un qui parle bien néerlandais”. CLIL bij oudere leerlingen. Unpublished., Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel.
  • De Smet, A., L. Mettewie, B. Galand, P. Hiligsmann, and L. Van Mensel. 2018. “Classroom Anxiety and Enjoyment in CLIL and non-CLIL: Does the Target Language Matter?” Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 8 (1): 47–71. doi:10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.1.3.
  • Dewaele, J.-M. 2005. “Sociodemographic, Psychological and Politicocultural Correlates in Flemish Students’ Attitudes Towards French and English.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 26 (2): 118–137. doi:10.1080/01434630508668400.
  • Doiz, A., D. Lasagabaster, and J. M. Sierra. 2014a. “CLIL and Motivation: The Effect of Individual and Contextual Variables.” The Language Learning Journal 42 (2): 209–224. doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.889508.
  • Doiz, A., D. Lasagabaster, and J. M. Sierra. 2014b. “Giving Voice to the Students: What (De)Motivates Them in CLIL Classes?” In Language Learning & Language Teaching, edited by D. Lasagabaster, A. Doiz, and J. M. Sierra, Vol. 40, 117–138. doi:10.1075/lllt.40.06doi.
  • Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
  • Dörnyei, Z. 2009. “The L2 Motivational Self System.” In Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self, edited by Z. Dörnyei, and E. Ushioda, 9–11. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Dörnyei, Z. 2019. “Psychology and Language Learning: The Past, the Present and the Future.” Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning 1: 27–41. doi: 10.52598/jpll/1/1/3
  • Entwisle, D. R., and N. M. Astone. 1994. “Some Practical Guidelines for Measuring Youth’s Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status.” Child Development 65 (6): 1521–1540. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00833.x.
  • European Commission. 2014. Improving the Effectiveness of Language Learning: CLIL and Computer Assisted Language Learning.
  • Eurydice. 2006. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Bruxelles: Eurydice European Unit.
  • Fernández Fontecha, A., and A. Canga Alonso. 2014. “A Preliminary Study on Motivation and Gender in CLIL and non-CLIL Types of Instruction.” International Journal of English Studies 14 (1): 21–36. doi: 10.6018/ijes/14/1/156681
  • Galand, B., and V. Hospel. 2015. “Facteurs associés au risque de décrochage scolaire: Vers une approche intégrative.” L’orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle 44 (3), doi:10.4000/osp.4604.
  • Gardner, R. C. 1985. Social Psychology and Second Language Learning. The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Gardner, R. C., and W. E. Lambert. 1959. “Motivational Variables in Second Language Acquisition.” Canadian Journal of Psychology 13 (4): 266–272. doi:10.1037/h0083787.
  • Gardner, R. C., and W. E. Lambert. 1972. Attitudes and Motivation in Second-Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Garrett, P., N. Coupland, and A. Williams. 2003. Investigating Language Attitudes: Social Meanings of Dialect, Ethnicity and Performance. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
  • Harrop, E. 2012. “Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Limitations and Possibilities.” Encuentro 21: 57–70.
  • Heras, A., and D. Lasagabaster. 2015. “The Impact of CLIL on Affective Factors and Vocabulary Learning.” Language Teaching Research 19 (1): 70–88. doi:10.1177/1362168814541736.
  • Higgins, E. T. 1987. “Self-discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect.” Psychological Review 94 (3): 319–340. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319.
  • Hiligsmann, P., L. Van Mensel, B. Galand, L. Mettewie, F. Meunier, A. Szmalec, and M. Simonis. 2017. “Assessing Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in French-Speaking Belgium: Linguistic, Cognitive and Educational Perspectives.” Les Cahiers de Recherche Du Girsef 109: 1–24.
  • Hunt, M. 2011. “Learners’ Perceptions of Their Experiences of Learning Subject Content Through a Foreign Language.” Educational Review 63 (3): 365–378. doi:10.1080/00131911.2011.571765.
  • Kormos, J., T. Kiddle, and K. Csizér. 2011. “Goals, Attitudes and Self-Related Beliefs in Second Language Learning Motivation: An Interactive Model of Language Learning Motivation.” Applied Linguistics 32 (5): 495–516. doi:10.1093/applin/amr019.
  • Lasagabaster, D. 2009. “The Implementation of CLIL and Attitudes Towards Trilingualism.” ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 157 (0): 23–43. doi:10.2143/ITL.157.0.2042586.
  • Lasagabaster, D. 2011. “English Achievement and Student Motivation in CLIL and EFL Settings.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 5 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1080/17501229.2010.519030.
  • Lasagabaster, D., and A. Doiz. 2017. “A Longitudinal Study on the Impact of CLIL on Affective Factors.” Applied Linguistics 38: 688–712. doi:10.1093/applin/amv059.
  • Lasagabaster, D., and R. López Beloqui. 2015. “The Impact of Type of Approach (CLIL Versus EFL) and Methodology (Book-Based Versus Project Work) on Motivation.” Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Didáctica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras 23: 41–57.
  • Lasagabaster, D., and J. M. Sierra. 2009. “Language Attitudes in CLIL and Traditional EFL Classes.” International CLIL Research Journal 1: 4–17.
  • Lochtman, K., M. Lutjeharms, and G. Kermarrec. 2005. “Langues étrangères à Bruxelles: Recherche sur les attitudes d’étudiants Bruxellois des écoles d’ingénieur commercial ULB et VUB.” In Language, Attitudes and Education in Multilingual Cities, edited by E. Witte, L. Van Mensel, M. Pierrard, L. Mettewie, A. Housen, and R. De Groof, 211–233. Brussels: Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België voor Wetenschappen en Kunst.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., and R. A. Blackie. 2012. “Action Control, Motivated Strategies, and Integrative Motivation as Predictors of Language Learning Affect and the Intention to Continue Learning French.” System 40 (4): 533–543. doi:10.1016/j.system.2012.10.014.
  • Markus, H., and P. Nurius. 1986. “Possible Selves.” American Psychologist 41 (9): 954–969. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954.
  • Masgoret, A.-M., and R. C. Gardner. 2003. “Attitudes, Motivation, and Second Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Conducted by Gardner and Associates.” Language Learning 53: 167–210. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00227.
  • Mearns, T., R. de Graaff, and D. Coyle. 2017. “Motivation for or From Bilingual Education? A Comparative Study of Learner Views in the Netherlands.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–14. doi:10.1080/13670050.2017.1405906.
  • Mettewie, L. 2004. Attitudes en motivatie van taalleerders in België. Brussel: Vrije Universiteit Brussel. https://researchportal.unamur.be/fr/publications/attitudes-en-motivatie-van-taalleerders-in-belgië.
  • Mettewie, L. 2015. “Apprendre la langue de “l’Autre” en Belgique: La dimension affective comme frein à l’apprentissage.” Le Langage et l’Homme 50 (2): 23–42.
  • Mettewie, L., and R. Janssens. 2007. “Language Use and Language Attitudes in Brussels.” In Multilingualism in European Bilingual Contexts: Language Use and Attitudes, edited by D. Lasagabaster and A. Huguet, 117–143. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Mettewie, L., and P. Lorette. 2014. “Tweetalig onderwijs als Belgische “philtre d’amour”. Attitudes van Franstalige CLIL-leerders van het Nederlands.” In In het teken van identiteit: Taal en cultuur van de Nederlanden, edited by L. Degand, P. Hiligsmann, L. Rasier, M. Sergier, S. Vanasten, and K. Van Goethem, 195–201. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
  • Mills, N., F. Pajares, and C. Herron. 2006. “A Reevaluation of the Role of Anxiety: Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, and Their Relation to Reading and Listening Proficiency.” Foreign Language Annals 39 (2): 276–295. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02266.x.
  • Mills, N., F. Pajares, and C. Herron. 2007. “Self-efficacy of College Intermediate French Students: Relation to Achievement and Motivation.” Language Learning 57 (3): 417–442. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00421.x.
  • Navarro-Villarroel, C. 2011. Young Students’ Attitudes Toward Languages. Iowa State University. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11978/.
  • Newcomb, T. M. 1950. Social Psychology. New York: Holt.
  • Noels, K. A., L. G. Pelletier, R. Clément, and R. J. Vallerand. 2000. “Why are you Learning a Second Language? Motivational Orientations and Self-Determination Theory.” Language Learning 50 (1): 57–85. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00111.
  • Piniel, K., and K. Csizér. 2013. “L2 Motivation, Anxiety and Self-Efficacy: The Interrelationship of Individual Variables in the Secondary School Context.” Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 3 (4): 523–550. doi:10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.4.5.
  • Raven, J. C., J. H. Court, and J. Raven. 1998. Progressive Coloured Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
  • Rumlich, D. 2014. “Prospective CLIL and non-CLIL Students’ Interest in English (Classes): A Quasi-Experimental Study on German Sixth-Graders.” In Integration of Theory and Practice in CLIL, edited by R. Breeze, C. Martínez Pasamar, C. Llamas Saíz, and C. Tabernero Sala, 75–95. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Seikkula-Leino, J. 2007. “CLIL Learning: Achievement Levels and Affective Factors.” Language and Education 21 (4): 328–341. doi:10.2167/le635.0.
  • Sharp, D., B. Thomas, E. Price, G. Francis, and I. Davies. 1973. Attitudes to Welsh and English in the Schools of Wales. Basingstoke/Cardiff: Macmillan/University of Wales Press.
  • Sierra, J. M. 2011. “CLIL and Project Work: Contributions From the Classroom.” In Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning: Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. M. Sierra, and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 211–239. Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Simonis, M., L. Van der Linden, B. Galand, P. Hiligsmann, and A. Szmalec. 2019. “Executive Control Performance and Foreign-Language Proficiency Associated with Immersion Education in French-Speaking Belgium.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–16. doi:10.1017/S136672891900021X.
  • Sylvén, L. K., and A. S. Thompson. 2015. “Language Learning Motivation and CLIL: Is There a Connection?” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 3 (1): 28–50. doi:10.1075/jicb.3.1.02syl.
  • Ushioda, E., and Z. Dörnyei2017. “Special Issue. Beyond Global English: Motivation to Learn Languages in a Multicultural World.” The Modern Language Journal 101 (3): 449–607. doi: 10.1111/modl.12434
  • Van de Craen, P., J. Surmont, K. Mondt, and E. Ceuleers. 2012. “Twelve Years of CLIL Practice in Multilingual Belgium.” In Primary CLIL Around Europe: Learning in Two Languages in Primary Education, edited by C. Lechner, and G. Egger, 81–97. Marburg: Tectum.
  • Van Mensel, L., P. Hiligsmann, L. Mettewie, and B. Galand. 2019. “CLIL, an Elitist Language Learning Approach? A Background Analysis of English and Dutch CLIL Pupils in French-Speaking Belgium.” Language, Culture and Curriculum, 1–14. doi:10.1080/07908318.2019.1571078.
  • Wigfield, A., and J. Cambria. 2010. “Expectancy-value Theory: Retrospective and Prospective.” In Advances in Motivation and Achievement, edited by T. C. Urdan, and S. A. Karabenick, Vol. 16, 35–70. doi:10.1108/S0749-7423(2010)000016A005.
  • Wigfield, A., and J. S. Eccles. 2000. “Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement Motivation.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.
  • Wigfield, A., J. S. Eccles, and D. Rodriguez. 1998. “Chapter 3: The Development of Children’s Motivation in School Contexts.” Review of Research in Education 23 (1): 73–118. doi:10.3102/0091732X023001073.
  • Williams, M., R. Burden, and U. Lanvers. 2002. “‘French is the Language of Love and Stuff’: Student Perceptions of Issues Related to Motivation in Learning a Foreign Language.” British Educational Research Journal 28 (4): 503–528. doi:10.1080/0141192022000005805.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.