References
- Alejo, R., and A. Piquer-Píriz. 2016. Urban vs. Rural CLIL: An Analysis of Input-related Variables, Motivation and Language Attainment. Language, Culture and Curriculum 8318, March: 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2016.1154068.
- Alonso, E., J. Grisaleña, and A. Campo. 2008. “Plurilingual Education in Secondary Schools: Analysis of Results.” International CLIL Research Journal 1 (1): 36–49.
- Anghel, B., A. Cabrales, and J. M. Carro. 2016. “Evaluating a Bilingual Education Programme in Spain: The Impact Beyond Foreign Language Learning.” Economic Inquiry 54 (2): 1202–1223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12305.
- Apelgren, B.-M. 2019. “The CLISS Student: Some Background Factors of the Participating Students in the CLISS Project.” In Investigating Content and Language Integrated Learning: Insights from Swedish High Schools, edited by L. Kerstin-Sylvén, 35–53. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
- Aro, S., and M. Mikkilä-Erdmann. 2015. “School-external Factors in Finnish Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Programs.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 59 (2): 127–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2014.894937.
- Barrios, MªE. 2019. “The Effect of Parental Education Level on Perceptions About CLIL: A Study in Andalusia.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1646702.
- Broca, A. 2016. “CLIL and Non-CLIL. Differences from the Outset.” ELT Journal 70 (3): 320–331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw011.
- Bruton, A. 2011. “Is CLIL So Beneficial, or Just Selective? Re-evaluating Some of the Research.” System 39 (4): 523–532. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002.
- Bruton, A. 2013. “CLIL: Some of the Reasons. Why … and Why Not.” System 41: 587–597. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001.
- Bruton, A. 2015. “CLIL: Detail Matters in the Whole Picture. More than a Reply to J. Hüttner and U. Smit (2014).” System 53: 119–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.07.005.
- Cenoz, J., F. Genesee, and D. Gorter. 2014. “Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” Applied Linguistics 35 (3): 243–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011.
- Collentine, J., and B. F. Freed. 2004. “Learning Context and its Effects on Second Language Acquisition: Introduction.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26: 153–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262015.
- Cordero, J. M., E. Crespo, and F. Pedraja. 2013. “Rendimiento educativo y determinantes según PISA: Una revisión de la literatura en España.” Revista de Educación 362: 273–297.
- Coyle, D., P. Hood, and D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL. Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dallinger, S., K. Jonkmann, J. Hollm, and Ch. Fieg. 2016. “The Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning on Students’ English and History Competences – Killing Two Birds with One Stone?” Learning and Instruction 41: 23–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.003
- Fernández-Sanjurjo, J., J. M. Arias Blanco, and A. Fernández-Costales. 2018. “Assessing the Influence of Socio-economic Status on Students’ Performance in Content and Language Integrated Learning.” System 73: 16–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.001.
- Fernández-Sanjurjo, J., A. Fernández-Costales, and J. M. Arias Blanco. 2017. “Analysing Students’ Content-learning in Science in CLIL vs. Non-CLIL Programmes: Empirical Evidence from Spain.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 20: 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1294142.
- Golberg, H., J. Paradis, and M. Crago. 2008. “Lexical Acquisition Over Time in Minority First Language Children Learning English as a Second Language.” Applied Psycholinguistics 29: 41–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640808003X
- Kormos, J., and T. Kiddle. 2013. “The Role of Socio-economic Factors in Motivation to Learn English as a Foreign Language: The Case of Chile.” System 41: 399–412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.03.006
- Lancaster, N. K. 2016. “The Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning on the Oral Skills of Compulsory Secondary Education Students: A Longitudinal Study.” Published doctoral dissertation, University of Jaén.
- Lasagabaster, D. 2008. “Foreign Language Competence in Content and Language Integrated Courses.” The Open Applied Linguistics Journal 1: 30–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.2174/1874913500801010030.
- Lasagabaster, D., and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, eds. 2010. CLIL in Spain. Implementation, Results and Teacher Training. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Madrid, D. 2010. “El contexto social del alumnado y su relación con el rendimiento en lengua Extranjera.” In Para, por y sobre Luis Quereda, edited by M. Falces, E. Hidalgo, J. Santana, and S. Valera, 519–533. Granada: Editorial Universidad de Granada.
- Madrid, D. 2011. “Monolingual and Bilingual Students’ Competence in Social Sciences.” In Studies in Bilingual Education, edited by D. Madrid and S. Hughes, 195–222. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
- Madrid, D., and E. Barrios. 2018. “A Comparison of Students’ Educational Achievement Across Programmes and School Types with and without CLIL Provision.” Porta Linguarum 29: 29–50.
- Marsh, D., ed. 2002. CLIL/EMILE. The European Dimension. Actions, Trends, and Foresight Potential. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
- Marsh, H., K.-T. Hau, and C.-K. Kong. 2000. “Late Immersion and Language of Instruction in Hong Kong High Schools. Achievement Growth in Language and Nonlanguage Subjects.” Harvard Educational Review 70: 302–347. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.70.3.gm047588386655k5
- Martínez, J. d. D. 2019a. “To What Extent Can CLIL Learners’ Oral Competence Outcomes be Explained by Contextual Differences? Updated Empirical Evidence from Spain.” Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 37 (1): 27–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2019.1598878.
- Martínez, J. d. D. 2019b. “Which Instructional Programme (EFL or CLIL) Results in Better Oral Communicative Competence? Updated Empirical Evidence from a Monolingual Context.” Linguistics and Education 51: 69–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.04.008.
- Mattheoudakis, M., T. Alexiou, and C. Laskaridou. 2014. “To CLIL or not to CLIL? The Case of the 3rd Experimental Primary School in Evosmos.” In Major Trends in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 20th International Symposium from Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, edited by N. Lavidas, T. Alexiou, and A. M. Sougari, 215–233. London: DeGruyter Versitas Publications.
- Mehisto, P. 2007. “What a School Needs to Consider Before Launching a CLIL Program: The Estonian Experience.” In Diverse Contexts-converging Goals: CLIL in Europe, edited by D. Marsh and D. Wolff, 61–77. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
- OECD. 2016. “Pisa 2015: Resultados Clave.” https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus-ESP.pdf.
- Ouazizi, K. 2016. “The Effects of CLIL Education on the Subject Matter (Mathematics) and the Target Language (English).” Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning 9 (1): 110–137. doi: https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.5
- Paran, A. 2013. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: Panacea or Policy Borrowing Myth?” Applied Linguistics Review 4 (2): 317–342. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0014
- Pelechano, V. 1994. “Prueba MA.” Análisis y Modificación de la Conducta 20: 71–72.
- Pérez-Cañado, M. L. 2012. “CLIL Research in Europe: Past, Present, and Future.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15 (3): 315–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064.
- Piesche, N., K. Jonkmann, Ch. Fiege, and J.-U. KeBler. 2016. “CLIL for All? A Randomised Controlled Field Experiment with Sixthgrade Students on the Effects of Content and Language Integrated Science Learning.” Learning and Instruction 44: 108–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.04.001
- Ráez-Padilla, J. 2018. “Parent Perspectives on CLIL Implementation: Which Variables Make a Difference?” Porta Linguarum 29: 181–196.
- Rascón, D. J., and C. M. Bretones. 2018. “Socioeconomic Status and its Impact on Language and Content Attainment in CLIL Contexts.” Porta Linguarum 29: 115–135.
- Santamaría, P., D. Arribas, J. Pereña, and N. Seisdedos. 2014. EFAI. Evaluación Factorial de las Aptitudes Intelectuales. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
- Sirin, S. R. 2005. “Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-analytic Review of Research.” Review of Educational Research 75 (3): 417–453. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417.
- Stehler, U. 2006. “The Acquisition of Knowledge in Bilingual Learning: An Empirical Study on the Role of Language in Content Learning.” Vienna English Working Papers 15 (3): 41–46.
- Surmont, J., E. Struys, M. Van Den Noort, and P. Van De Craen. 2016. “The Effects of CLIL on Mathematical Content Learning: A Longitudinal Study.” Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 6 (2): 319–337. doi: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.2.7
- Van De Craen, P., E. Ceuleers, and K. Mondt. 2007. “Cognitive Development and Bilingualism in Primary Schools: Teaching Maths in a CLIL Environment.” In Diverse Contexts-converging Goals. CLIL in Europe, edited by D. Marsh and D. Wolff, 185–200. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
- Villarreal, I., and M. P. García. 2009. “Tense and Agreement Morphology in the Interlanguage of Basque/Spanish Bilinguals: CLIL Versus Non-CLIL.” In Content and Language Integrated Learning. Evidence from Research in Europe, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe and R. M. Jiménez Catalán, 152–175. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
- Zhan, M. 2006. “Assets, Parental Expectations and Involvement, and Children’s Educational Performance.” Children and Youth Services Review 28: 961–975. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.10.008