A showdown between bilingual and mainstream education: the impact of language of instruction on learning subject content knowledge

References

• Admiraal, W., G. Westhoff, and K. De Bot. 2006. “Evaluation of Bilingual Secondary Education in the Netherlands: Students’ Language Proficiency in English.” Educational Research and Evaluation 12 (1): 75–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500392160
   Google Scholar
• Bertaux, P., C. Coonan, M. Frigols-Martin, and P. Mehisto. 2010. The CLIL Teacher’s Competences Grid. http://www.ccn-clil.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2011. “Is CLIL so Beneficial, or Just Selective? Re-Evaluating Some of the Research.” System 39 (4): 523–532. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cito. 2019. Examenverslagen 2015–2019, 12 October. https://www.cito.nl/onderwijs/voortgezet-onderwijs/centrale-examens-voortgezet-onderwijs/tools-en-informatie-voor-docenten/examenverslagen.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee-Lachmann, D. 2009. “Assessment of Subject Specific Task Performance of Bilingual Geography Learners: Analysing Aspects of Subject Specific Written Discourse.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation. https://repositorium.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/urn:nbn:de:gbv:700-2009030617.
   Google Scholar
• Coffin, C. 2006. “Learning the Language of School History: the Role of Linguistics in Mapping the Writing Demands of the Secondary School Curriculum.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 38 (4): 413–429. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500508810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., P. Hood, and D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dallinger, S., K. Jonkmann, J. Hollm, and C. Fiege. 2016. “The Effect of Content and Language Integrated Learning on Students’ English and History Competences; Killing two Birds with one Stone?” Learning and Instruction 41: 23–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2011. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles?” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 182–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira, L. 2011. Knowing and Writing School History. The Language of Student’s Expository Writing and Teachers’ Expectations. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., and K. Rawson. 2012. “Overconfidence Produces Underachievement: Inaccurate Self-Evaluations Undermine Students’ Learning and Retention.” Learning and Instruction 22 (4): 271–280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurydice/European Commission/EACEA. 2017. Key Data on Teaching Languages at School in Europe – 2017 Edition. Eurydice report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Huibregtse, I. 2001. “Effecten en Didactiek van Tweetalig Voortgezet Onderwijs in Nederland [ Effects and teaching methods in bilingual high school education in the Netherlands].” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Jappinen, A.-K. 2005. “Thinking and Content Learning of Mathematics and Science as Cognitional Development in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Teaching Through a Foreign Language in Finland.” Language and Education 19 (2): 148–169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780508668671
   Google Scholar
• Lublin, J. 2003. Deep, Surface and Strategic Approaches to Learning. Belfield: Centre for Teaching and Learning, University College Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Martinot, M., H. Kuhlemeier, and H. Feenstra. 1988. “Het meten van affectieve doelen: de validering en normering van de belevingsschaal voor wiskunde (BSW) [Measuring Affective Goals: the Validation and Standardization of the Math Experience Scale].” Tijdschrift Voor Onderwijsresearch 13: 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Mearns, T., R. De Graaff, and D. Coyle. 2017. “Motivation for or from Bilingual Education? A Comparative Study of Learner Views in the Netherlands.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1405906.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, C., M. Maehr, L. Hruda, E. Anderman, L. Anderman, and K. Freeman. 2000. Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Oattes, H., R. Oostdam, R. De Graaff, R. Fukkink, and A. Wilschut. 2018a. “CLIL in Dutch Bilingual Education: How Dutch History Teachers Focus on Second Language Learning.” Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7 (2): 156–176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.18003.oat
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oattes, H., R. Oostdam, R. De Graaff, and A. Wilschut. 2018b. “The Challenge of Balancing Content and Language: Perceptions of Dutch Bilingual Education History Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 70: 165–174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, R., and M. Boekaerts. 1990. “Schoolvakbeleving bij geschiedenis, Nederlands en wiskunde bij leerlingen in de brugklas [Attitude Towards History, Dutch and Maths in the First Year of Secondary Education].” In Onderwijsleerprocessen, edited by M. Boekaerts and E. De Corte, 101–116. Nijmegen: Instituut voor Toegepaste Sociale Wetenschappen.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Canado, M. 2017. “CLIL and Educational Level: A Longitudinal Study on the Impact of CLIL on Language Outcomes.” Porta Linguarum 29: 51–70.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P., and E. De Groot. 1990. “Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1): 33–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Isidro, X., and D. Lasagabaster. 2018. “The Impact of CLIL on Pluriliteracy Development and Content Learning in a Rural Multilingual Setting: A Longitudinal Study.” Language Teaching Research 22. Online Publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817754103.
   Google Scholar
• Seegers, G., C. Van Putten, and C. De Brabander. 2002. “Goal Orientation, Perceived Task Outcome and Task Demands in Mathematic Tasks: Effects on Students Attitude in Actual Task Settings.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 365–384. doi: https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902320634366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohler, U. 2006. “The Acquisition of Knowledge in Bilingual Learning: an Empirical Study on the Role of Learning in Content Learning.” Vienna English Working Papers 15 (3): 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P., C. Roberts, and P. Smith. 2012. “Middle Alternatives Revisited: How the Neither/nor Response Acts as a Way of Saying ‘I Don’t Know?’” Sociological Methods and Research 43 (1): 15–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112452527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvén, L., and A. Thompson. 2015. “Language Learning Motivation and CLIL: Is There a Connection?” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 3 (1): 28–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.3.1.02syl
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. 2016. “The use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education.” Research in Science Education 48 (6): 1273–1296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kaap, A., and A. Visser. 2016. Geschiedenis. Vakspecifieke Trendanalyse 2016. Enschede: SLO.
   Google Scholar
• Van Drie, J., M. Braaksma, and C. Van Boxtel. 2015. “Writing in History Effects of Writing Instruction on Historical Reasoning and Text Quality.” Journal of Writing Research 7 (1): 123–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.07.01.06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verspoor, M., C. de Bot, and X. Xu. 2015. “The Effects of English Bilingual Education in the Netherlands.” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 3 (1): 4–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.3.1.01ver
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilschut, A. 2015. “Testing Frame of Reference Knowledge in National Examinations. Report on an Experiment in the Netherlands.” In Joined-Up History: New Directions in History Education Research ( International Review of History Education, Vol. 8), edited by A. Chapman and A. Wilschut, 85–112. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Zydatiss, W. 2007. Deutsch-Englische Zuge in Berlin (DEZIBEL). Eine evaluation des bilingualen Sachfachsunterrichts in Gymnasien: Kontext, Kompetenzen, Konsequenzen [ German-English Tracks in Berlin (DEZIBEL). An Evaluation of Bilingual Subject Teaching in Secondary Schools: Context, Competencies, Consequences]. Frankfurt am Main: Pieter Lang.
   Google Scholar