References
- Airey, J. 2011. “The Disciplinary Literacy Discussion Matrix: A Heuristic Tool for Initiating Collaboration in Higher Education.” Across the Disciplines 8 (3). https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/atd/clil/airey.cfm.
- Airey, J. 2012. “I Don’t Teach Language.” The Linguistic Attitudes of Physics Lecturers in Sweden.” AILA Review 25: 64–79. doi: 10.1075/aila.25.05air
- Airey, J. 2016. “EAP, EMI or CLIL?”. In The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes, edited by K. Hyland and P. Shaw, 71–83. London: Routledge.
- Airey, J., and J. Larsson. 2018. “Developing Students’ Disciplinary Literacy? The Case of University Physics.” In Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education, edited by K.-S. Tang and K. Danielsson, 357–376. Cham: Springer.
- Airey, J., and C. Linder. 2006. “Language and the Experience of Learning University Physics in Sweden.” European Journal of Physics 27 (3): 553–560. doi: 10.1088/0143-0807/27/3/009
- Airey, J., and C. Linder. 2017. “Social Semiotics in University Physics Education.” In Multiple Representations in Physics Education, edited by D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, and H. E. Fischer, 95–122. Cham: Springer.
- Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.
- Halliday, M. A. K., and J. R. Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: The Falmer Press.
- Hodge, R., and G. Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity.
- Jacobs, C. 2007. “Towards a Critical Understanding of the Teaching of Discipline-Specific Academic Literacies: Making the Tacit Explicit.” Journal of Education 41: 59–81.
- Klaassen, R. 2001. “The International University Curriculum: Challenges in English-Medium Engineering Education.” Doctoral Thesis, Department of Communication and Education, Delft University of Technology. Delft.