Multimodal mediational means in assessment of processes: an argument for a hard-CLIL approach

References

• Ball, P., K. Kelly, and J. Clegg. 2015. Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers: Putting CLIL Into Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliam. 2004. “Working Inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom.” Phi Delta Kappan 86 (1): 8–21. doi: 10.1177/003172170408600105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, S. 2018. “The Unit and Focus of Analysis in Lingua Franca English Interactions: In Search of a Method.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21 (7): 805–824. doi:10.1080/13670050.2018.1474850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J. 2015. “Content-based Instruction and Content and Language Integrated Learning: The Same or Different?” Language, Culture and Curriculum 28 (1): 8–24. doi:10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis. 2017. E-learning Ecologies: Principles for New Learning and Assessment. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2018. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment: Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., P. Hood, and D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dafouz, E., and U. Smit. 2016. “Towards a Dynamic Conceptual Framework for English-Medium Education in Multilingual University Settings.” Applied Linguistics 37 (3): 397–415. doi:10.1093/applin/amu034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, C., and C. Leung. 2009. “Current Issues in English Language Teacher-Based Assessment.” TESOL Quarterly 43 (3): 393–415. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00242.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deBoer, M. 2018. “Dialogic Inquiry as a Process in the Flipped Classroom.” In Innovations in Flipping the Language Classroom: Theories and Practices, edited by J. Mehring and A. Leis, 123–145. Singapore: Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6968-0_10.
   Google Scholar
• deBoer, M., and D. Leontjev. submitted. Assessment and Learning in CLIL Classrooms: Approaches and Conceptualisations.
   Google Scholar
• deBoer, M. submitted. Analysis of Online Asynchronous Learner-Learner Dialogue in a CLIL Classroom (doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dooly, M. 2017. “A Mediated Discourse Analysis (MDA) Approach to Multimodal Data.” In Qualitative Approaches to Research on Plurilingual Education, edited by E. Moore and M. Dooly, 189–211. Dublin, Ireland: Research-Publishing Net.
   Google Scholar
• Evnitskaya, N., and T. Morton. 2011. “Knowledge Construction, Meaning-Making and Interaction in CLIL Science Classroom Communities of Practice.” Language and Education 25 (2): 109–127. doi:10.1080/09500782.2010.547199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. 2013. “Very Excellent”: An Historical Approach to Problems of State Sponsored English Education in Japan. New York: New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, A. 2006. An inconvenient truth: The planetary emergency of global warming and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Rodale.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, A., D. Guggenheim, L. David, L. Bender, S. Z. Burns, J. Skoll, and L. Chilcott. 2006. An Inconvenient Truth. Hollywood, CA: Paramount.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, G. J. 1998. “Yakudoku EFL Instruction in Two Japanese High School Classrooms: An Exploratory Study.” JALT Journal 20 (1): 6–32.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. 2016. “Testing Four Skills in Japan. British Council New Directions in Language Assessment.” JASELE Journal Special Edition 135–144. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/77038094.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda, M. 2013. “Does CLIL Work for Japanese Secondary School Students? Potential for the “Weak” Version of CLIL.” International CLIL Research Journal 2 (1): 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kupetz, M. 2011. “Multimodal Resources in Students’ Explanations in CLIL Interaction.” Research on Youth and Language 5 (1): 121–142.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., and M. E. Poehner. 2011. “Dynamic Assessment in the Classroom: Vygotskian Praxis for Second Language Development.” Language Teaching Research 15 (1): 11–33. doi:10.1177/1362168810383328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., and M. E. Poehner. 2014. Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative in L2 Education: Vygotskian Praxis and the Research/Practice Divide. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., M. E. Poehner, and M. Swain. 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Development. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leontjev, D., T. Jakonen, and K. Skinnari. submitted. "Assessing (for) Understanding in the CLIL Classroom." In Assessment and Learning in CLIL Classrooms: Approaches and Conceptualisations, edited by M. deBoer and D. Leontjev.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, C., and T. Morton. 2016. “Conclusion: Language Competence, Learning and Pedagogy in CLIL – Deepening and Broadening Integration.” In Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education, edited by T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, and U. Smit, 235–248. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Y. Y., and A. M. Y. Lin. 2015. “Special Issue: Designing Multilingual and Multimodal CLIL Frameworks for EFL Students.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18 (3): 261–269. doi:10.1080/13670050.2014.988111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Met, M. 1999. Content-based Instruction: Defining Terms, Making Decisions. Washington, DC: NFLC Reports. The National Foreign Language Center. Accessed September 17, 2019 from http://carla.umn.edu/cobaltt/modules/principles/decisions.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• METI. 2010. Release of Report by Global Human Resource Development Committee of the Industry-Academia Partnership for Human Resource Development. Tokyo: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.
   Google Scholar
• MEXT. 2014. English Education Reform Plan Corresponding to Globalization. Tokyo. http://www.mext.go.jp/en/news/topics/detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2014/01/23/1343591_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, E. 2014. “Constructing Content and Language Knowledge in Plurilingual Student Teamwork: Situated and Longitudinal Perspectives.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 17 (5): 586–609. doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.860947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikula, T., E. Dafouz, P. Moore, and U. Smit. 2016. Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Nikula, T., C. Dalton-Puffer, and A. Llinares. 2013. “CLIL Classroom Discourse: Research From Europe.” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 1 (1): 70–100. doi:10.1075/jicb.1.1.04nik.
   Google Scholar
• Nikula, T., and P. Moore. 2019. “Exploring Translanguaging in CLIL.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22 (2): 237–249. doi:10.1080/13670050.2016.1254151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S. 2004. Analysing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. 2011. Multimodality in Practice: Investigating Theory-in-Practice-Through-Methodology. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. 2008. Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting L2 Development. Norwell: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Quartapelle, F. 2012. Assessment and evaluation in CLIL. Accessed April 8, 2019. www.aeclil.altervista.org.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, S. submitted. "Achieving in Content Through Language: Towards a CEFR Descriptor Scale for Academic Language Proficiency." In Assessment and Learning in CLIL Classrooms: Approaches and Conceptualisations, edited by M. deBoer and D. Leontjev.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, L. 2018. “Translanguaging as a Practical Theory of Language.” Applied Linguistics 39 (1): 9–30. doi: 10.1093/applin/amx039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. 1994. “The Primacy of Mediated Action in Sociocultural Studies.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 1 (4): 202–208. doi:10.1080/10749039409524672.
   Google Scholar