MulTINCo: multilingual traditional immersion and native corpus. Better-documented multiliteracy practices for more refined SLA studies

References

• Ädel, A. 2015. “Variability in Learner Corpora.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, edited by S. Granger, G. Gilquin, and F. Meunier, 401–421. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ballier, N., and P. Martin. 2015. “Speech Annotation of Learner Corpora.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, edited by S. Granger, G. Gilquin, and F. Meunier, 107–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P., L. Collins, and E. Marsden. forthcoming. “Building an Oral and Written Learner Corpus of a School Programme: Methodological Issue.” In Learner Corpora and Second Language Acquisition Research, edited by B. LeBruyn and M. Paquot. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., and S. Conrad. 2019. Register, Genre, and Style (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108686136.
   Google Scholar
• Breeze, R. 2007. “How Personal is This Text? Researching Writer and Reader Presence in Student Writing Using WordSmith Tools.” CORELL: Computer Resources for Language Learning 1: 14–21. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ruth_Breeze/publication/266491163_How_Personal_is_this_Text_Researching_Writer_and_Reader_Presence_in_Student_Writing_Using_Wordsmith_Tools/links/5448d1ea0cf2d62c3052c94b.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brezina, V. 2018. “Collocation Graphs and Networks: Selected Applications.” In Lexical Collocation Analysis: Advances and Applications, edited by P. Cantos-Gómez and M. Almela-Sánchez, 59–83. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Broisson, Z., and K. Van Goethem. 2018. “Comparative Constructions in French-speaking Belgian Learners of English: A Contrastive Approach.” Poster presented at the Using Corpora in Contrastive and Translation Studies Conference, 5th ed., Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, September 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bulon, A. 2019. “The Acquisition of Phraseological Units by French-speaking Learners of English and Dutch in CLIL and Non-CLIL Settings: Exposure Effects on Range and Accuracy.” PhD dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve.
   Google Scholar
• Bulon, A. 2020. “Comparing the ‘Phrasicon’ of Teenagers in Immersive and Non-immersive Settings: Does Input Quantity Impact Range and Accuracy?” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 8 (1): 107–136. doi: 10.1075/jicb.18010.bul
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulon, A., I. Hendrikx, F. Meunier, and K. Van Goethem. 2017. “Using Global Complexity Measures to Assess Second Language Proficiency: Comparing CLIL and Non-CLIL Learners of English and Dutch in French-speaking Belgium.” Travaux du CBL 11 (1): 1–25. https://sites.uclouvain.be/bkl-cbl/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Bulon_et_al_2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Buntinx, N., and K. Van Goethem. 2018. “Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Intensification in Speech: A Comparison of L1 French and L2 English and Dutch.” Poster presented at the Using Corpora in Contrastive and Translation Studies Conference, 5th ed., Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, September 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Callies, M. 2015. “Variability in Learner Corpora.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, edited by S. Granger, G. Gilquin, and F. Meunier, 401–421. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callies, M., and M. Paquot. 2015. “Learner Corpus Research: An Interdisciplinary Field on the Move.” International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.00edi issn2215–1478/e-issn2215–1486.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2011. “Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles?” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 182–204. doi:10.1017/S0267190511000092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degand, L., and J. Perrez. 2004. “Causale Connectieven in Het Leerdercorpus Nederlands.” N/F. Tijdschrift van de Association des néerlandistes de Belgique francophone 4: 115–128. https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/134576/1/degand&perrez(2004)-nf.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, M. 2018. “Woordvolgorde bij CLIL- en niet-CLIL-leerders van het Nederlands: één pot nat? Vergelijkend onderzoek naar de beheersing van de PV2- en V-eind-regels bij (niet-)CLIL-leerders en bij moedertaalsprekers.” Master’s dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., and L. M. Dunn. 2007. PPVT-4: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Minneapolis: Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., L. M. Dunn, and J. E. P. T. Schlichting. 2005. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III-NL. New York: Harcourt Test Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., L. M. Dunn, and C. Theriault-Whalen. 1993. EVIP: Echelle de Vocabulaire en Images Peabody. Toronto: Pearson Canada Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Entwisle, D. R., and N. M. Astone. 1994. “Some Practical Guidelines for Measuring Youth’s Race/ Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status.” Child Development 65: 1521–1540. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00833.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentil, G., and F. Meunier. 2018. “A Systemic Functional Linguistic Approach to Usage-based Research and Instruction. The Case Of Nominalization in L2 Academic Writing.” In Usage-inspired L2 Instruction. Researched Pedagogy, edited by A. E. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, and H. I. Park, 267–289. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gilquin, G. 2008. “Combining Contrastive and Interlanguage Analysis to Apprehend Transfer: Detection, Explanation, Evaluation.” In Linking up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research, edited by G. Gilquin, S. Papp, and M. B. Díez-Bedmar, 3–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Gilquin, G. 2015. “From Design to Collection of Learner Corpora.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, edited by S. Granger, G. Gilquin, and F. Meunier, 9–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, S. 1996. “From CA to CIA and Back: An Integrated Approach to Computerized Bilingual and Learner Corpora.” In Languages in Contrast. Text-Based Cross-linguistic Studies, edited by K. Aijmer, 37–51. Lund: Lund University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, S., ed. 1998. Learner English on Computer. London: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, S. 2002. “A Bird’s-Eye View of Learner Corpus Research.” In Language Learning and Language Teaching Volume 6: Computer Learner Corpora Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching, edited by S. Granger, J. Hung, and S. Petch-Tyson, 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, S. 2015. “Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis: A Reappraisal.” International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1 (1): 7–24. doi:10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, S., and Y. Bestgen. 2014. “The Use of Collocations by Intermediate vs. Advanced Non-native Writers: A Bigram-based Study.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 52 (3): 229–252. doi:10.1515/iral-2014-0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, S., E. Dagneaux, and F. Meunier. 2002. The International Corpus of Learner English. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, S., G. Gilquin, and F. Meunier, eds. 2013. Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking Back, Moving Ahead. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, S., G. Gilquin, and F. Meunier, eds. 2015. The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, S., F. Meunier, and M. Paquot. 2009. The International Corpus of Learner English – Version 2. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, S., and M. Paquot. 2009. “Lexical Verbs in Academic Discourse: A Corpus-Driven Study of Learner Use.” In Academic Writing. At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse, edited by M. Charles, D. Pecorari, and S. Hunston, 193–214. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrikx, I. 2019. “The Acquisition of Intensifying Constructions in Dutch and English by French-speaking CLIL and Non-CLIL Students: Cross-linguistic Influence and Exposure Effects. PhD dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrikx, I., K. Van Goethem, and S. Wulff. 2019. “Intensifying Constructions in French-speaking L2 Learners of English and Dutch: Cross-linguistic Influence and Exposure Effects.” International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5 (1): 63–103. doi:10.1075/ijlcr.18002.hen.
   Google Scholar
• Hiligsmann, P., and L. Rasier. 2011. “Het geïntegreerde contrastieve onderzoeksdesign onder de loep.” In Nederlands in het perspectief van uitspraakverwerving en contrastieve taalkunde Lage Landen Studies, edited by L. Rasier, V. van Heuven, B. Defrancq, and P. Hiligsmann, 183–194. Gent: Academia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiligsmann, P., L. Van Mensel, B. Galand, L. Mettewie, F. Meunier, A. Sczmalec, K. Van Goethem, et al. 2017. “Assessing Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in the French-speaking Community of Belgium: Linguistic, Cognitive and Educational Perspectives.” Cahiers du GIRSEF 109: 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, M. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S. 2000. “Methodological Rigor in the Study of Transfer: Identifying L1 Influence in the Interlanguage Lexicon.” Language Learning 50 (2): 245–309. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, W., and C. Perdue. 1997. “The Basic Variety (Or: Couldn’t Natural Languages Be Much Simpler?).” Second Language Research 13 (4): 301–347. doi:10.1191/026765897666879396.
   Google Scholar
• Littré, D. 2014. “A Cognitive, Longitudinal Study of the Use of the English Present Progressive by Intermediate and Advanced French-Speaking Learners.” PhD dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain.
   Google Scholar
• Lozano, C., and A. Mendikoetxea. 2013. “Learner Corpora and Second Language Acquisition: The Design and Collection of CEDEL2.” In Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data, edited by A. Díaz-Negrillo, N. Ballier, and P. Thompson, 65–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, E., A. Mackey, and L. Plonsky. 2016. “The IRIS Repository: Advancing Research Practice and Methodology.” In Advancing Methodology and Practice: The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research into Second Languages, edited by A. Mackey and E. Marsden, 1–21. New-York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McEnery, T., V. Brezina, D. Gablasova, and J. Banerjee. 2019. “Corpus Linguistics, Learner Corpora, and SLA: Employing Technology to Analyze Language Use.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 39: 74–92. doi:10.1017/S0267190519000096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettewie, L. 2015. “Apprendre la langue de « l’autre » en Belgique : la dimension affective comme frein à l’apprentissage.” Le Langage et l’Homme 50 (2): 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, F. 2015. “Developmental Patterns in Learner Corpora.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, edited by S. Granger, G. Gilquin, and F. Meunier, 379–400. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, J., and S. Götz. 2015. “Learner Corpora and Learning Context.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, edited by S. Granger, G. Gilquin, and F. Meunier, 423–442. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myles, F. 2015. “SLA Theory and Learner Corpus Research.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, edited by S. Granger, G. Gilquin, and F. Meunier, 309–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The New London Group. 1996. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66 (1): 60–93. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, L., and H. Byrnes. 2009. “The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities: An introduction.” In The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities, edited by L. Ortega and H. Byrnes, 3–20. New-York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paquot, M., H. Naets, and S.Th. Gries. forthcoming. “Using Syntactic Co-occurrences to Trace Phraseological Complexity Development in Learner Writing: Verb + Object Structures in LONGDALE.” In Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpora, edited by B. Le Bruyn and M. Paquot. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perdue, C., ed. 1993. Adult Language Acquisition: Volume 2, the Results: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C., J. H. Court, and J. Raven. 1998. Progressive Coloured Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. 1996. “EAGLES. Preliminary Recommendations on Corpus Typology.” EAGLES Document EAG TCWG-CTYP/P http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES/corpustyp/corpustyp.html.
   Google Scholar
• Van Mensel, L., A. Bulon, I. Hendrikx, F. Meunier, and K. Van Goethem. 2020. “Effects of Input on L2 Writing Skills in English and Dutch: CLIL and Non-CLIL Learners in French-speaking Belgium.” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1075/jicb.18034.van.
   Google Scholar
• Van Mensel, L., P. Hiligsmann, L. Mettewie, and B. Galand. 2020. “CLIL, an Elitist Language Learning Approach? A Background Analysis of English and Dutch CLIL Pupils in French-Speaking Belgium.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 33 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/07908318.2019.1571078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, J., and S. Th. Gries, eds. 2016. Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar