CLIL students’ definitions of historical terms

References

• Beacco, J. C. 2010. Items for a Description of Linguistic Competence in the Language of Schooling Necessary for Teaching/Learning History (End of Obligatory Education). Strasbourg: Language Policy Division, Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Beacco, J. C., M. Fleming, F. Goullier, E. Thürmann, H. Vollmer, and J. Sheils. 2016. A Handbook for Curriculum Development and Teacher Training. The Language Dimension in all Subjects. Strasbourg: Language Policy Division, Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Benelli, B., C. Belacchi, G. Gini, and D. Lucangeli. 2016. “‘To Define Means to Say What You Know About Things’: The Development of Definitional Skills as Metalinguistic Acquisition.” Journal of Child Language 33: 71–97. doi: 10.1017/S0305000905007312
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 1999. “Vertical and Horizontal Discourse: An Essay.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 20 (2): 157–173. doi: 10.1080/01425699995380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, F., and B. Derewianka. 2010. School Discourse: Learning to Write Across the Years of Schooling. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Coffin, C. 2006a. “Reconstructing Personal Time as Collective Time: Learning the Dis-Course of History.” In Language and Literacy: Functional Approaches, edited by R. Whittaker, M. O’Donnell, and A. McCabe, 207–232. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Coffin, C. 2006b. Historical Discourse. The Language of Time, Cause and Evaluation. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe CM/Rec. 2014. Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the Importance of Competences in the Language(s) of Schooling for Equity and Quality in Education and for Educational Success. Accessed December 25, 2018. https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805c6105.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. 1979. “Linguistic Interdependence and the Educational Development of Bilingual Children.” Review of Educational Research 49: 222–251. doi: 10.3102/00346543049002222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2013. “A Construct of Cognitive Discourse Functions in CLIL and Multilingual Education.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (2): 216–253. doi: 10.1515/eujal-2013-0011
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2016. “Cognitive Discourse Functions: Specifying an Integrative Interdisciplinary Construct.” In Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education, edited by T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, and U. Smit, 29–54. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Eggins, S., J. R. Martin, and P. Wignell. 1993. “The Discourse of History: Distancing the Recoverable Past.” In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, edited by M. Ghadessy, 75–109. New York: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J. 1991. “Pragmatic Modifications on the ‘Representative’ Speech act of Defining.” Journal of Pragmatics 15 (3): 253–264. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(91)90013-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J. 1992. “Definitions in Science Lectures.” Applied Linguistics 13 (2): 202–221. doi: 10.1093/applin/13.2.202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 2007. “Language and Education.” In The Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday (Vol. 9), edited by J. J. Webster, 368–382. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, H.-M. 2010. “Language as a Meaning Making Resource in Learning and Teaching Content. Analysing Historical Writing in Content and Language Integrated Learning.” In Language use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, edited by C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, and U. Smit, 145–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Llinares, A., and R. Whittaker. 2007. “Talking and Writing in a Foreign Language in CLIL Contexts: A Linguistic Analysis of Secondary School Learners of Geography and History.” Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 1: 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Llinares, A., and R. Whittaker. 2010. “Writing and Speaking in the History Class.” In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, edited by C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, and U. Smit, 125–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F. 2017. “Historical Literacy in Bilingual Settings: Cognitive Academic Language in CLIL History Narratives.” Linguistics and Education 37: 32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F., and O. Meyer. 2018. “Languages of Schooling: Language Competence and Educational Success.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics 6 (1): 1–3. doi: 10.1515/eujal-2017-0033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 2013. “Embedded Literacy: Knowledge as Meaning.” Linguistics and Education 24: 23–37. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., and D. Rose. 2008. Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Maton, K. 2014. “Building Powerful Knowledge: The Significance of Semantic Waves.” In Knowledge and the Future of the Curriculum: International Studies in Social Realism, edited by B. Barrett and E. Rata, 181–197. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nashaat Sobhy, N., P. Winne, Z. Marzouk, and E. Langa. 2017. Using Trace Data to Take a Peek into the Black Box: The Case of ‘Definitions’. Paper presented at the 5th Integrated Content and Language in Higher Education, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Nikula, T., E. Dafouz, P. Moore, and U. Smit. 2016. Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, M. 2008. “Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for Text and Image Annotation.” In Proceedings of the ACL-08: HLT Demo Session Companion Volume, 13–16. Columbus, OH: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P08-4004/.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J. 2001. Calculation for the Chi-Square Test: An Interactive Calculation Tool for Chi-Square Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. 2001. “Linguistic Features of the Language of Schooling.” Linguistics and Education 12 (4): 431–459. doi: 10.1016/S0898-5898(01)00073-0
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. 2004. The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E. 1990. “The Development of Definitional Skill.” Journal of Child Language 17 (3): 697–710. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900010953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., H. Cancini, P. Gonzalez, and E. Shriberg. 1989. "Giving Formal Definitions: An Oral Language Correlate of School Literacy." Classrooms and Literacy, 233–249.
   Google Scholar
• Trimble, L. 1985. English for Science and Technology: A Discourse Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmer, J. H. 2006. Languages Across the Curriculum. Languages of Schooling: Towards a Framework for Europe. Strasbourg: Language Policy Division. https://rm.coe.int/16805c7464.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmer, J. H. 2010. “Items for a Description of Linguistic Competence in the Language of Schooling Necessary for Learning/Teaching Sciences (At the End of Compulsory Education): An Approach with Reference Points.” In Language and School Subjects: Linguistic Dimensions of Knowledge Building in School Curricula (2), 1–29. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Language Policy Division, Directorate of Education and Languages.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserstein, R. L., A. L. Schirm, and N. A. Lazar. 2019. “Moving to a World Beyond ‘p<0.05’.” The American Statistician 73 (1): 1–19. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. 2011. “What are Schools for?” Educação, Sociedade & Culturas 32: 145–155.
   Google Scholar