1,234
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Cognitive discourse functions in CLIL classrooms: eliciting and analysing students’ oral categorizations in science and history

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 311-330 | Received 24 Jan 2019, Accepted 15 Jul 2020, Published online: 07 Sep 2020

References

  • Achugar, M., and B. D. Carpenter. 2012. “Developing Disciplinary Literacy in a Multilingual History Classroom.” Linguistics and Education 23 (3): 262–276. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2012.05.003
  • Anderson, L. W., and D. R. Krathwohl, eds. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Group.
  • Beacco, J.-C. 2010. Items for a Description of Linguistic Competence in the Language of Schooling Necessary for Learning/Teaching History (End of Obligatory Education). An Approach With Reference Points. Language and School Subjects: Linguistic Dimensions of Knowledge Building in School Curricula N°1. Language Policy Division. Directorate of Education and Languages, DGIV. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  • Bloom, B. S., and D. R. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by a Committee of College and University Examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
  • Cohen, H., and C. Lefebvre. 2017. “Bridging the Category Divide: Introduction to the First Edition.” In Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, edited by H. Cohen and C. Lefebvre, 2nd ed., 1–17. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Dalton-Puffer, C. 2013. “A Construct of Cognitive Discourse Functions for Conceptualising Content-Language Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (2): 216–253. doi: 10.1515/eujal-2013-0011
  • Dalton-Puffer, C. 2016. “Cognitive Discourse Functions: Specifying and Integrative Interdisciplinary Construct.” In Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education, edited by T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, and U. Smit, 29–54. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Dalton-Puffer, C., and S. Bauer-Marschallinger. 2019. “Cognitive Discourse Functions Meet Historical Competences: Towards an Integrated Pedagogy in CLIL History Education.” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 7 (1): 30–60. doi: 10.1075/jicb.17017.dal
  • Dalton-Puffer, C., S. Bauer-Marschallinger, K. Brückl-Mackey, V. Hofmann, J. Hopf, L. Kröss, and L. Lechner. 2018. “Cognitive Discourse Functions in Austrian CLIL Lessons: Towards an Empirical Validation of the CDF Construct.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics 6 (1): 5–29. doi: 10.1515/eujal-2017-0028
  • de Oliveira, L., and J. Iddings, eds. 2014. Genre Pedagogy Across the Curriculum: Theory and Application in U.S. Classrooms and Contexts. Sheffield: Equinox.
  • de Oliveira, L., L. Jones, and S. Smith. this issue. Scaffolding for Meaningful Interactions in a First-Grade Classroom Through the Teaching-Learning Cycle.
  • Edwards, D. J. J. 2015. Integrating Behavioural and Cognitive Psychology: A Modern Categorization Theoretical Approach. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
  • Eggins, S. 2004. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1979. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.
  • Halliday, M. A. K., and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
  • Lemke, J. L. 1990. Talking Science. Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
  • Linneweber-Lammerskitten, H. 2010. Items for a Description of Linguistic Competence in the Language of Schooling Necessary for Learning/Teaching Mathematics (In Secondary Education). An Approach With Reference Points. Language and School Subjects: Linguistic Dimensions of Knowledge Building in School Curricula N°4. Language Policy Division. Directorate of Education and Languages, DGIV. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  • Martin, J. R., and D. Rose. 2008. Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.
  • Mohan, B. 1986. Language and Content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  • O’Donnell, M. 2008. UAM Corpus Tool. http://www.wagsoft.com/CorpusTool/.
  • Pérez-Vidal, C., and H. Roquet. 2015. “The Linguistic Impact of a CLIL Science Programme: An Analysis Measuring Relative Gains.” System 54: 80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2015.05.004
  • Polias, J. 2016. Apprenticing Students Into Science: Doing Talking & Writing Scientifically. Melbourne: Lexis Education.
  • Rose, D., and J. R. Martin. 2012. Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.
  • Rothery, J. 1994. Exploring Literacy in School English (Write It Right Resources for Literacy and Learning). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged School Programme.
  • Rumlich, D. 2016. Evaluating Bilingual Education in Germany: CLIL Students’ General English Proficiency, EFL Self-Concept and Interest. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
  • Swales, J. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Trimble, L. 1985. English for Science and Technology: A Discourse Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Vollmer, J. H. 2010. Items for a Description of Linguistic Competence in the Language of Schooling Necessary for Learning/Teaching Sciences (At the End of Compulsory Education). An Approach With Reference Points. Language and School Subjects: Linguistic Dimensions of Knowledge Building in School Curricula N°2. Language Policy Division. Directorate of Education and Languages, DGIV. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  • Wasserstein, R. L., A. L. Schirm, and N. A. Lazar. 2019. “Moving to a World Beyond “p< 0.05”.” The American Statistician 73 (1): 1–19. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913
  • Widdowson, H. G., ed. 1979. Reading and Thinking in English: Discovering Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.