The (heterogeneous) effect of CLIL on content-subject and cognitive acquisition in primary education: evidence from a counterfactual analysis in Italy

References

• Admiraal, W., G. Westhoff, and K. de Bot. 2006. “Evaluation of Bilingual Secondary Education in the Netherlands: Students’ Language Proficiency in English.” Educational Research and Evaluation 12: 75–93.
   Google Scholar
• Anghel, B., A. Cabrales, and J. M. Carro. 2016. “Evaluating a Bilingual Education Program in Spain: the Impact Beyond Foreign Language Learning.” Economic Inquiry 54 (2): 1202–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badertscher, H., and T. Bieri. 2009. Wissenserwerb im Content and Language Integrated Learning: empirische Befunde und Interpretationen. Bern: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Baetens Beardsmore, H. 1993. European Models of Bilingual Education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Bergroth, M. 2006. “Immersion Students in the Matriculation Examination Three Years After Immersion.” In Exploring Dual-Focussed Education. Integrating Language and Content for Individual and Societal Needs, edited by S. Björklund, K. Mard-Miettinen, M. Bergström, and M. Södergard, 123–134. Vaasa: University of Vaasa, Centre for Immersion and Multilingualism.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, M., S. Iacus, G. King, and G. Porro. 2009. “cem: Coarsened Exact Matching in Stata.” The Stata Journal 9 (4): 524–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnet, A. 2004. Chemie im bilingualen Unterricht – Kompetenzerwerb durch Interaktion. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnet, A. 2015. “Sachfachlicher Kompetenzerwerb in naturwissenschaftlichen CLIL Kontexten.” In CLIL Revisited: Eine kritische Analyse zum gegenwärtigen Stand des bilingualen Sachfachunterrichts, edited by B. Rüschoff, J. Sudhoff, and D. Wolff, 165–182. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Brese, F., and P. Mirazchiyski. 2013. Measuring Students’ Family Background in Large-Scale International Education Studies. Hamburg: IEA-ETS Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. 1970. The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2013. “CLIL: Some of the ReasonsWhy … and Why Not.” System 41 (3): 587–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Y. G. 2014. “Parental Factors and Early English Education as a Foreign Language: A Case Study in Mainland China.” Research Papers in Education 29 (4): 410–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Y. G., and V. N. Le. 2018. “A Longitudinal Investigation of Parental Social-Economic Status (SES) and Young Students’ Learning of English as a Foreign Language.” System 73: 4–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cañado, M. L. P. 2018. “The Effects of CLIL on L1 and Content Learning: Updated Empirical Evidence From Monolingual Contexts.” Learning and Instruction 57: 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. 2003. Promoting language learning and linguistic diversity: An action plan 2004-2006. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52003DC0449.
   Google Scholar
• Coonan, C. M., and F. Ricci-Garotti. 2019. “Uno studio qualitativo.” In Il CLIL nella scuola primaria. Alcune evidenze secondo una ricerca quanti-qualitativa nel contesto trentino, edited by S. Virdia and D. Wolff, 69–103. Rovereto: IPRASE.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., P. Hood, and D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M. 2002. “Levels of Processing: Past, Present and Future?” Memory 10 (6): 305–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., and R. S. Lockhart. 1972. “Levels of Processing: a Framework for Memory Research.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11: 671–684.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. 1979. “Linguistic Interdependence and the Educational Development of Bilingual Children.” Review of Educational Research 49 (2): 222–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. 2000. “Putting Language Proficiency in its Place.” In English in Europe. The Acquisition of a Third Language, edited by J. Cenoz, and U. Jessner, 54–83. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Dallinger, S., K. Jonkmann, J. Hollm, and C. Fiege. 2016. “The Effect of Content and Language Integrated Learning on Students’ English and History Competences–Killing two Birds with one Stone?” Learning and Instruction 41: 23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2011. “Content-and-language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 182–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., and U. Smit. 2013. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: A Research Agenda.” Language Teaching 46 (4): 545–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darn, S. 2006. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): A European Overview. INGED News Online 2. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490775.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• de Diezmas, E. N. M. 2016. “The Impact of CLIL on the Acquisition of the Learning to Learn Competence in Secondary School Education in the Bilingual Programmes of Castilla-La Mancha.” Porta Linguarum 25: 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Doiz, A., D. Lasagabaster, and J. M. Sierra. 2014. “CLIL and Motivation: The Effect of Individual and Contextual Variables.” The Language Learning Journal 42 (2): 209–224.
   Google Scholar
• Facchini, M., M. Triventi, and L. Vergolini. 2020. “Do Grants Improve the Outcomes of University Students in a Challenging Context? Evidence from a Matching Approach.” Higher Education, 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00586-3.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Sanjurjo, J., J. M. A. Blanco, and A. Fernández-Costales. 2018. “Assessing the Influence of Socio-Economic Status on Students’ Performance in Content and Language Integrated Learning.” System 73: 16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Sanjurjo, J., A. Fernández-Costales, and J. M. Arias Blanco. 2019. “Analysing Students’ Content-Learning in Science in CLIL vs. non-CLIL Programmes: Empirical Evidence From Spain.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22 (6): 661–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C. 2012. “Evolutionary Educational Psychology.” In APA Educational Psychology Handbook, Vol. 1. Theories, Constructs, and Critical Issues, edited by K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, and J. Sweller, 597–621. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C., L. Mathelitsch, and M. Hopf. 2011. “Fremdsprachiger Physikunterricht: Fremdsprachlicher Mehrwert auf Kosten fachlicher Leistungen? Auswirkungen fremdsprachenintegrierten Physikunterrichts auf fachliche Leistungen.” Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 17: 223–260.
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J. 2012. “Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies.” Political Analysis 20 (1): 25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbach, A. 2009. “The Primary School Teacher and the Challenges of Bilingual Education.” In CLIL Across Educational Levels: Experiences From Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Contexts, edited by E. Dafouz, and M. C. Guerrini, 19–26. Madrid: Richmond Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., and L. Woessmann. 2011. “The Economics of International Differences in Educational Achievement.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 3, edited by E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, and L. Woessmann, 89–200. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Jäppinen, A. K. 2005. “Thinking and Content Learning of Mathematics and Science as Cognitional Development in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Teaching Through a Foreign Language in Finland.” Language and Education 19 (2): 147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Lamsfuß-Schenk, S. 2007. Fremdverstehen im bilingualen Geschichtsunterricht: Eine Fallstudie. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. 2008. “Foreign Language Competence in Content and Language Integrated Courses.” The Open Applied Linguistics Journal 1 (1): 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Le Pape Racine, C. 2007. “Integrierte Sprachendidaktik. Immersion und das Paradoxe an ihrem Erfolg.” Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen-und Lehrerbildung 25 (2): 156–167.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 2002. CLIL/EMILE-The European Dimension: Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential. Strasburg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., and M. O. Martin, eds. 2013. TIMSS 2015 Assessment Frameworks. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website.
   Google Scholar
• Osterhage, S. 2009. “Sachfachkönnen (Scientific Literacy) Bilingual und Monolingual Unterrichteter Biologieschüler: ein Kompetenzvergleich.” In Bilingualer Unterricht Macht Schule, edited by D. Caspari, W. Hallet, A. Wegner, and W. Zydatiß, 41–50. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Otwinowska, A. 2013. “CLIL Lessons in the Upper-Primary: The Interplay of Affective Factors and CALP.” In Affective Dimension in Second Language Acquisition, edited by D. Gabryś-Barker, and J. Bielska, 211–225. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Otwinowska, A., and M. Foryś. 2017. “They Learn the CLIL way, but do They Like it? Affectivity and Cognition in Upper-Primary CLIL Classes.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 20 (5): 457–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papert, S. 1990. “Introduction.” In Constructionist Learning, edited by I. Harel, 2–5. Boston: MIT Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Paran, A. 2013. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: Panacea or Policy Borrowing Myth?” Applied Linguistics Review 4 (2): 317–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. 1968. Mémoire et Intelligence. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Piesche, N., K. Jonkmann, C. Fiege, and J. U. Keßler. 2016. “CLIL for all? A Randomised Controlled Field Experiment with Sixth-Grade Students on the Effects of Content and Language Integrated Science Learning.” Learning and Instruction 44: 108–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirner, M. L. 2007. “Empirische Unterrichtsforschung zum bilingualen Religionsunterricht und Konsequenzen für den ‘normalen’ Religionsunterricht.” Zeitschrift für Religionspädagogik 6 (2): 42–52.
   Google Scholar
• Rascón Moreno, D., and C. M. Bretones Callejas. 2018. “Socioeconomic Status and its Impact on Language and Content Attainment in CLIL Contexts.” Porta Linguarum 29: 115–135.
   Google Scholar
• Roussel, S., D. Joulia, A. Tricot, and J. Sweller. 2017. “Learning Subject Content Through a Foreign Language Should not Ignore Human Cognitive Architecture: A Cognitive Load Theory Approach.” Learning and Instruction 52: 69–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumlich, D. 2016. Evaluating the Effects of Bilingual Education in Germany: The Development of CLIL Students’ General English Language Proficiency and Their Affective-Motivational Dispositions. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Saalbach, H., D. Eckstein, N. Andri, R. Hobi, and R. H. Grabner. 2013. “When Language of Instruction and Language of Application Differ: Cognitive Costs of Bilingual Mathematics Learning.” Learning and Instruction 26: 36–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Isidro, X., and D. Lasagabaster. 2019. “The Impact of CLIL on Pluriliteracy Development and Content Learning in a Rural Multilingual Setting: A Longitudinal Study.” Language Teaching Research 23 (5): 584–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seikkula-Leino, J. 2007. “CLIL Learning: Achievement Levels and Affective Factors.” Language and Education 21 (4): 328–341.
   Google Scholar
• Surmont, J., P. Craen, E. Struys, and T. Somers. 2014. “Evaluating a CLIL-Student: Where to Find the CLIL Advantage.” In Integration of Theory and Practice in CLIL, edited by R. Breeze, C. Pasamar, C. Saíz, and C. Sala, 55–72. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 2011a. “Cognitive Load Theory.” In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Cognition in Education, edited by J. Mestre, and B. Ross, Vol. 55, 37–76. Oxford: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 2011b. “Human Cognitive Architecture: Why Some Instructional Procedures Work and Others do not.” In APA Educational Psychology Handbook, edited by K. Harris, S. Graham, and T. Urdan, Vol. 1, 295–325. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., P. Ayres, and S. Kalyuga. 2011. Cognitive Load Theory. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Virdia, S., and D. Wolff. 2020. “Teaching Preferences in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): An Exploratory Study Based on the Vignette Experiment Methodology.” Scuola Democratica 11(2): 235–258.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1962. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, D. 2003. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: a Framework for the Development of Learner Autonomy.” In Learner Autonomy in the Foreign Language Classroom: Teacher, Learner, Curriculum and Assessment, edited by D. Little, J. Ridley, and E. Ushioda, 198–210. Dublin: Authentik.
   Google Scholar
• Zydatiß, W. 2007. Deutsch-englische Züge in Berlin: Eine Evaluation des bilingualen Sachfachunterrichts an Gymnasien. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Zydatiß, W. 2012. “Linguistic Thresholds in the CLIL Classroom? The Threshold Hypothesis Revisited.” International CLIL Research Journal 1 (4): 17–28.
   Google Scholar