Teachers as designers of learning in diverse, bilingual classrooms in England: an ADiBE case study

References

• Ainscow, M., T. Booth, A. Dyson, P. Farrell, J. Frankham, F. Gallannaugh, A. Howes, and R. Smith. 2006. Improving Schools, Developing Inclusion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Antonacopoulou, E. 2007. “Actionable Knowledge.” In International Encyclopaedia of Organization Studies, edited by S. Clegg, and J. Bailey. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., and N. Jackson. 2020. Ecologies for Learning and Practice: Emerging Ideas, Sightings and Possibilities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barwell, R. 2005. “Integrating Language and Content: Issues from the Mathematics Classroom.” Linguistics and Education 16 (2): 205–218. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2006.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. J. 2006. Beyond Learning: Democratic Education for a Human Future. Boulder: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Council (BERA). 2011. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research 2011. London: BERA.
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2015. “CLIL: Detail Matters in the Whole Picture. More Than a Reply to J. Hüttner and U. Smit (2014).” System 53: 119–128. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2004. Social Research Methods. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., F. Genesee, and D. Gorter. 2014. “Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” Applied Linguistics 35 (3): 243–262. doi:10.1093/applin/amt011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M. 2003. “The Unforgiving Complexity of Teaching: Avoiding Simplicity in the Age of Accountability.” Journal of Teacher Education 54 (1): 3–5. doi:10.1177/0022487102238653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conteh, J. 2012. Teaching Bilingual and EAL Learners in Primary Schools. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Costley, T., and C. Leung. 2009. “English as an Additional Language Across the Curriculum: Policies in Practice.” In Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Classrooms: New Dilemmas for Teachers, edited by J. Miller, A. Kostogriz, and M. Gearon, 151–171. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2018. “The Place of CLIL in (Bilingual) Education.” Theory Into Practice 57 (3): 166–176. doi:10.1080/00405841.2018.1459096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., P. Hood, and D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. 2013. “Why so Many Structural Changes in Schools and so Little Reform in Teaching Practice?” Journal of Educational Administration 51 (2): 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, E. M. 2020. On Language Teachers and CLIL: Shifting the Perspectives. Amsterdam: Kenniscentrum Onderwijs en Opvoeding.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., A. Llinares, F. Lorenzo, and T. Nikula. 2014. “‘You Can Stand Under My Umbrella’: Immersion, CLIL and Bilingual Education. A Response to Cenoz, Genesee, and Gorter (2013).” Applied Linguistics 35 (2): 213–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, E. J., and C. A. Harper. 2005. “Preparing Mainstream Teachers for English-Language Learners: Is Being a Good Teacher Good Enough?” Teacher Education Quarterly 32 (2): 101–124.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). 2020. Schools, Pupils and Their Characteristics: January 2020. London: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. 2020. “Context Is Everything: Reflections on CLIL in the UK.” The Language Learning Journal 48 (5): 508–518. doi:10.1080/09571736.2020.1804104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, A., and B. C. Herman. 2015. “Teacher Contextual Knowledge.” In Encyclopedia of Science Education, edited by R. Gunstone. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, Y., C. Anderson, J. Conteh, and J. Hancock. 2018. Initial Teacher Education and English as an Additional Language. Research Report: Bell Foundation/Unbound Philanthropy.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., and M. Langworthy. 2014. A Rich Seam: How new Pedagogies Find Deep Learning. London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, O. 2009. Bilingual Education in the Twenty-First Century: A Global Perspective. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, G. 2018. Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. 3rd Edition. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. 2018. “What Is Academic Literacy and Who Should Teach It?” EAL Journal 6: 56–62.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, C. A., and E. Sleeter. 2007. Doing Multicultural Education for Achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halbach, A. 2020. “English Language Teaching Goes CLIL: Fostering Literacy and Language Development in Secondary Schools in Spain.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language Education Curriculum Design, edited by P. Mickan, and I. Wallace. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R., and C. Leung. 2011. “English as an Additional Language: Challenges of Language and Identity in the Multi-Lingual and Multi-Ethnic Classroom.” In Becoming a Teacher: Issues in Secondary Education, edited by J. Dillon, and M. Maguire, 203–215. New York: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H. 2010. Literacy and Power. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, H. M. 2005. “Language Learning in Content-Based Instruction.” In Investigations in Second Language Acquisition, edited by A. Housen, and M. Pierrard, 433–456. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D., and M. Biddulph. 2015. “The Dialogic Space Offered by Curriculum-Making in the Process of Learning to Teach, and the Creation of a Progressive Knowledge-led Curriculum.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 43 (3): 210–224. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2014.934197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. 2012. Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, C. 2005. “English as an Additional Language Policy: Issues of Inclusive Access and Language.” Prospect 20 (1): 95–113.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, C. 2012. “English as an Additional Language Policy-Rendered Theory and Classroom Interaction.” In Multilingualism, Discourse, and Ethnography, edited by S. Gardner, and M. Martin-Jones, 222–240. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. 2007. Learning and Teaching Languages Through Content: A Counter-Balanced Approach. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. 2013. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Messiou, K., and M. Ainscow. 2020. “Inclusive Inquiry: Student-Teacher Dialogue as a Means of Promoting Inclusion in Schools.” British Educational Research Journal 46 (3): 670–687. doi:10.1002/berj.3602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, O., and D. Coyle. 2017. “Pluriliteracies Teaching for Learning: Conceptualizing Progression for Deeper Learning in Literacies Development.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics 5 (2): 199–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, O., D. Coyle, A. Halbach, T. Ting, and K. Schuck. 2015. ““A Pluriliteracies Approach to Content and Language Integrated Learning: Mapping Learner Progressions in Knowledge Construction and Meaning-Making.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 28 (1): 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, R. A. 2015. “Rethinking today’s language ecologies: New questions about language use and literacy practices” [Webinar]. In Global Conversations in Literacy Research. Available at https://youtu.be/CMLnXwx3lRY.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. 2018. “What Does the Research on Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Tell us About EAL?” EAL Journal 6: 56–62.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. Education 2030: The Future of Education and Skills. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. 2020. Inspection of December 2019. Ofsted Inspection Report. https://files.ofsted.gov.uk/v1/file/50143397.
   Google Scholar
• Paniagua, A., and D. Istance. 2018. Teachers as Designers of Learning Environments: The Importance of Innovative Pedagogies.” Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M. L. 2020. “What’s Hot and What’s Not on the Current CLIL Research Agenda: Weeding Out the non-Issues from the Real Issues. A Response to Bruton (2019).” Applied Linguistics Review.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, L., and Y. Foley. 2019. “Using Critical Literacy to ‘do’ Identity and Gender.” In Social Justice Re-Examined: Dilemmas and Solutions for the Classroom Teacher, edited by R. Arshad, T. Wrigley, and L. Pratt, 72–91. London: UCL Institute of Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, J. 2004. “‘Like Everybody Else’: Equalizing Educational Opportunity for English Language Learners.” TESOL Quarterly 38: 43–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 2005. “Qualitative Case Studies.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 443–466. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. 2011. “A Typology for the Case Study in Social Science Following a Review of Definition, Discourse, and Structure.” Qualitative Inquiry 17 (6): 511–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mensel, L., P. Hiligsmann, L. Mettewie, and B. Galand. 2020. ““CLIL, an Elitist Language Learning Approach? A Background Analysis of English and Dutch CLIL Pupils in French-Speaking Belgium.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 33 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/07908318.2019.1571078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. 2007. “Super-diversity and its Implications.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (6): 1024–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods Fourth Edition, Vol. 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. 2019. “Conceptualising the Curriculum.” In Re-Examining the Curriculum. London: BERA Research Intelligence Spring 2019.
   Google Scholar