CLIL for all? An exploratory study of reported pedagogical practices in Austrian secondary schools

References

• Badertscher, H., and T. Bieri. 2009. Wissenserwerb im Content-and-Language Integrated Learning. Bern: Haupt Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, P., K. Kelly, and J. Clegg. 2015. Putting CLIL into Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banegas, D. L. 2017. “Teacher-Developed Materials for CLIL: Frameworks, Sources, and Activities.” Asian EFL Journal 19 (3): 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer-Marschallinger, S. 2019. “With United Forces: How Design-Based Research Can Link Theory and Practice in the Transdisciplinary Sphere of CLIL.” CLIL Journal 2 (2): 7–23. doi:10.5565/rev/clil.19.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer-Marschallinger, S. 2020. “Involving Students in Educational Design: How Student Voices Contribute to Shaping Transdisciplinary CLIL History Materials.” Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning 2 (2): 107–117. http://jpll.org/index.php/journal/article/view/29.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 1975. Class Codes and Control: Theoretical Studies Towards a Sociology of Language. vol. 3. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Biewer, G., M. Proyer, and G. Kremsner. 2019. Inklusive Schule und Vielfalt. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• BMB (Federal Ministry of Education). 2011. Allgemeines Bildungsziel, schulautonome Lehrplanbestimmungen, didaktische Grundsätze und gemeinsame Unterrichtsgegenstände an den Höheren Technischen und Gewerblichen (einschließlich Kunstgewerblichen) Lehranstalten. BGBl_II_Nr_300_2011: Anlage 1. www.ris.bka.gv.at.
   Google Scholar
• BMBWF (Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research). 2018. Austrian Educational System. www.bmbwf.gv.at/dam/jcr%3A652bbca0-b5a9-4bd8-a283-f969149d2486/bildungssystemgrafik_2018e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., S. Bauer-Marschallinger, K. Brückl-Mackey, V. Hofmann, J. Hopf, L. Kröss, and L. Lechner. 2018. “Cognitive Discourse Functions in Austrian CLIL Lessons: Towards an Empirical Validation of the CDF Construct.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics 6 (1): 5–29. doi:10.1515/eujal-2017-0028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., J. Hüttner, V. Schindlegger, and U. Smit. 2009. “Technology-Geeks Speak Out: What Students Think About Vocational CLIL.” International CLIL Research Journal 1 (2): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., T. Nikula, and U. Smit. 2010. “Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL: Current Findings and Contentious Issues.” In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, edited by C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, and U. Smit, 279–291. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaff, R., G. J. Koopman, and G. Westhoff. 2007. “Identifying Effective L2 Pedagogy in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” VIEWS: Vienna English Working Papers 16 (3): 12–19. http://anglistik.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/dep_anglist/weitere_Uploads/Views/Views_0703.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, V. 2020. “Student Voices on CLIL: Suggestions for Improving Compulsory CLIL Education in Austrian Technical Colleges (HTL).” CELT Matters 4: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerer, E. 2019. “Kann Inklusion unter den Strukturen des segregativen Schulsystems in Österreich gelingen?” In Ist inklusive Schule möglich? Nationale und internationale Perspektiven, edited by E. Feyerer, J. Donlic, E. Jaksche-Hoffman, and H. K. Peterlini, 61–76. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gierlinger, E. 2015. “‘You Can Speak German, Sir’: On the Complexity of Teachers’ L1 Use in CLIL.” Language and Education 29 (4): 347–368. doi:10.1080/09500782.2015.1023733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierlinger, E. M. 2017. “I Feel Traumatized: Teachers’ Beliefs on the Roles of Languages and Learning in CLIL.” In Integrating Content and Language in Higher Education: Perspectives on Professional Practice. Selected Papers from the IV International Conference Integrating Content and Language in Higher Education 2015, edited by J. Valcke, and R. Wilkinson, 97–116. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hüttner, J., C. Dalton-Puffer, and U. Smit. 2013. “The Power of Beliefs: Lay Theories and their Influence on the Implementation of CLIL Programmes.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16 (3): 267–284. doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.777385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüttner, J., and U. Smit. 2018. “Negotiating Political Positions: Subject-Specific Oral Language Use in CLIL Classrooms.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21 (3): 287–302. doi:10.1080/13670050.2017.1386616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lialikhova, D. 2019. “‘We Can Do It Together!’ – But Can They? How Norwegian Ninth Graders Co-constructed Content and Language Knowledge Through Peer Interaction in CLIL.” Linguistics and Education 54: 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2019.100764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid, D., and M. L. Pérez Cañado. 2018. “Innovations and Challenges in Attending to Diversity Through CLIL.” Theory into Practice 57 (3): 241–249. doi:10.1080/00405841.2018.1492237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahan, K. R. 2020. “The Comprehending Teacher: Scaffolding in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” The Language Learning Journal 18 (4): 1–15. doi:10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879.
   Google Scholar
• Mahan, K. R., L. M. Brevik, and M. Ødegaard. 2021. “Characterizing CLIL Teaching: New Insights from a Lower Secondary Classroom.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 24 (3): 401–418. doi:10.1080/13670050.2018.1472206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehisto, P., D. Marsh, and M. J. Frigols. 2009. Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education (reprint). München: Macmillan and Hueber (Macmillan books for teachers).
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, O. 2013. “Introducing the CLIL-Pyramid: Key Strategies and Principles for CLIL Planning and Teaching.” In Basic Issues in EFL Teaching and Learning, 2nd ed., edited by M. Eisenmann, 295–313. Heidelberg: Winter (Anglistische Forschungen, Bd. 420).
   Google Scholar
• Moore, P., and F. Lorenzo. 2015. “Task-based Learning and Content and Language Integrated Learning Materials Design: Process and Product.” The Language Learning Journal 43 (3): 334–357. doi:10.1080/09571736.2015.1053282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, T., A. Schad, B. Semmler, and M. Wimmer. 2012. “Austria.” In Language Rich Europe: Trends in Policies and Practices for Multilingualism in Europe, edited by G. Extra, and K. Yağmur, 83–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2017). Education Policy Outlook: Austria. www.oecd.org/education/Education-Policy-Outlook-Country-Profile-Austria.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. L., D. Rascón Moreno, and V. Cueva López. 2021. “Identifying difficulties and best practices in catering to diversity in CLIL: instrument design and validation.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13670050.2021.1988050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. L. this issue. “Guest Editorial.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Submitted.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel, S., D. Joulia, A. Tricot, and J. Sweller. 2017. “Learning Subject Content Through a Foreign Language Should Not Ignore Human Cognitive Architecture: A Cognitive Load Theory Approach.” Learning and Instruction 52: 69–79. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, U., and T. Finker. 2018. “CLIL in Austrian Technical Colleges (HTL): An Analysis of Classroom Practices Based on Systematic Video-Based Lesson Observations.” In Formen der Mehrsprachigkeit. Sprachen und Varietäten in sekundären und tertiären Bildungskontexten. With assistance of Philip C. Vergeiner, edited by M. Dannerer, and P. Mauser, 229–246. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag (Stauffenburg Linguistik, Band 102).
   Google Scholar
• Statistik Austria. 2019. Schülerinnen und Schüler mit nicht-deutscher Umgangssprache im Schuljahr 2018/19. https://www.statistik.at/wcm/idc/idcplg?IdcService=GET_PDF_FILE&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&dDocName=029650.
   Google Scholar
• van Kampen, E., W. Admiraal, and A. Berry. 2018. “Content and Language Integrated Learning in the Netherlands: Teachers’ Self-Reported Pedagogical Practices.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21 (2): 222–236. doi:10.1080/13670050.2016.1154004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vienna Board of Education. 2016. Modern Language Initiatives. http://www.schulentwicklung.at/joomla/images/stories/Sprachinitiativen/Fremdsprachenmodell_SJ_16_17.pdf.
   Google Scholar