Inclusion and diversity in bilingual education: a European comparative study

References

• Ainsworth, E., and V. Shepherd. 2017. An Evaluation of English Language Capability. Madrid: British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Anghel, B., A. Cabrales, and J. M. Carro. 2016. “Evaluating a Bilingual Education Program in Spain: The Impact Beyond Foreign Language Learning.” Economic Inquiry 54 (2): 1202–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrios Espinosa, E. 2019. “The Effect of Parental Education Level on Perceptions About CLIL: A Study in Andalusia.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. doi:10.1080/13670050.2019.1646702.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer-Marschallinger, S., C. Dalton-Puffer, H. Heaney, L. Katzinger, and U. Smit. 2021. CLIL for all? An Exploratory Study of Reported Pedagogical Practices in Austrian Secondary Schools.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. doi:10.1080/13670050.2021.1996533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D. 2001. Using Surveys in Language Programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2011a. “Are the Differences Between CLIL and non-CLIL Groups in Andalusia Due to CLIL? A Reply to Lorenzo, Casal and Moore (2010).” Applied Linguistics 2011: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2011b. “Is CLIL so Beneficial, or Just Selective? Re-Evaluating Some of the Research.” System 39: 523–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2013. “CLIL: Some of the Reasons Why … and Why Not.” System 41: 587–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2015. “CLIL: Detail Matters in the Whole Picture. More Than a Reply to J. Hüttner and U. Smit (2014).” System 53: 119–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2019. “Questions About CLIL Which are Unfortunately Still not Outdated: A Reply to Pérez-Cañado.” Applied Linguistics Review 10 (4): 591–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cioè-Peña, M. 2017. “The Intersectional Gap: How Bilingual Students in the United States are Excluded from Inclusion.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 21 (9): 906–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dallinger, S., K. Jonkmann, and J. Hollm. 2018. “Selectivity of Content and Language Integrated Learning Programmes in German Secondary Schools.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21 (1): 93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. 1970. Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Sanjurjo, J., A. Fernández-Costales, and J. M. Arias Blanco. 2019. “Analysing Students’ Content-Learning in Science in CLIL vs. non-CLIL Programmes: Empirical Evidence from Spain.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22 (6): 661–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, R., and A. Halbach. 2011. “Analysing the Situation of Teachers in the Madridautonomous Community Bilingual Project.” In Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning: Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. M. Sierra, and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 241–270. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gortázar, L., and P. A. Taberner. 2020. “La incidencia del programa bilingüe en la segregación escolar por origen socioeconómico en la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid: Evidencia a partir de PISA.” REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación 18 (4): 219–239.
   Google Scholar
• Grieve, A. M., and I. Haining. 2011. “Inclusive Practice? Supporting Isolated Bilingual Learners in a Mainstream School.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 15 (7): 763–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüttner, J., and U. Smit. 2014. “CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning): The Bigger Picture. A Response to A. Bruton. 2013. CLIL: Some of the Reasons Why … and Why Not.” System 44 (2): 160–167.
   Google Scholar
• Junta de Andalucía. 2017. Plan Estratégico de Desarrollo de las Lenguas en Andalucía. Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía. <http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/educacion/webportal/abaco-portlet/content/462f16e3-c047-479f-a753-1030bf16f822>.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F., S. Casal, and P. Moore. 2009. “The Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in European Education: Key Findings from the Andalusian Bilingual Sections Evaluation Project.” Applied Linguistics 31 (3): 418–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaro, E., S. Curle, J. Pun, A. Jiangshan, and J. Dearden. 2018. “A Systematic Review of English Medium Instruction in Higher Education.” Language Teaching 51 (1): 36–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid, D., and M. E. Barrios. 2018. “A Comparison of Students’ Educational Achievement Across Programmes and School Types with and Without CLIL Provision.” Porta Linguarum 29: 29–50.
   Google Scholar
• Madrid, D., and M. L. Pérez Cañado. 2018. “Innovations and Challenges in Attending to Diversity Through CLIL.” Theory Into Practice 57 (3): 241–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Pastor, E., and R. Durán Martínez. 2018. “La inclusión educativa en los programas bilingües de educación primaria: un análisis documental.” Revista Complutense de Educación 30 (2): 589–604.
   Google Scholar
• Mehisto, P., and H. Asser. 2007. “Stakeholder Perspectives: CLIL Programme Management in Estonia.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10 (5): 683–701.
   Google Scholar
• Paran, A. 2013. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: Panacea or Policy Borrowing Myth?” Applied Linguistics Review 4 (2): 317–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavón Vázquez, V. 2018. “Learning Outcomes in CLIL Programmes: a Comparison of Results Between Urban and Rural Environments.” Porta Linguarum 29: 9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Pena Díaz, C., and M. D. Porto Requejo. 2008. “Teacher Beliefs in a CLIL Education Project.” Porta Linguarum 10: 151–161.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. L. 2016a. “Teacher Training Needs for Bilingual Education: In-Service Teacher Perceptions.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 19 (3): 266–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. L. 2016b. “Are Teachers Ready for CLIL? Evidence from a European Study.” European Journal of Teacher Education 39 (2): 202–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. L. 2016c. “From the CLIL Craze to the CLIL Conundrum: Addressing the Current CLIL Controversy.” Bellaterra Journal of Teaching and Learning Language and Literature 9 (1): 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. L. 2018. “CLIL and Pedagogical Innovation: Fact or Fiction?” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28: 369–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. L. 2020a. “CLIL and Elitism: Myth or Reality?” Language Learning Journal 48 (1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. L. 2020b. “Common CLIL (mis) Conceptions: Setting the Record Straight.” In The Manifold Nature of Bilingual Education, edited by M. T. Calderón Quindós, N. Barranco Izquierdo, and T. Eisenrich, 1–30. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. L., D. Rascón Moreno, and V. Cueva López. 2021. “Identifying Difficulties and Best Practices in Catering to Diversity in CLIL: Instrument Design and Validation.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. doi:10.1080/13670050.2021.1988050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ráez Padilla, J. 2018. “Parent Perspectives on CLIL Implementation: Which Variables Make a Difference?” Porta Linguarum 29: 181–196.
   Google Scholar
• Rascón Moreno, D., and C. Bretones Callejas. 2018. “Socioeconomic Status and its Impact on Language and Content Attainment in CLIL Contexts.” Porta Linguarum 29: 115–136.
   Google Scholar
• Roiha, A. S. 2014. “Teachers’ Views on Differentiation in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Perceptions, Practices and Challenges.” Language and Education 28 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlan, M. 2011. “How School Leaders Can Accent Inclusion for Bilingual Students, Families, and Communities.” Multicultural Education, Winter 2011: 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, T. 2017. “Content and Language Integrated Learning and the Inclusion of Immigrant Minority Language Students: A Research Review.” International Review of Education 63: 495–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers, T. 2018. “Multilingualism for Europeans, Monolingualism for Immigrants? Towards Policy-Based Inclusion of Immigrant Minority Language Students in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” European Journal of Language Policy 10 (2): 203–228.
   Google Scholar