The impact of CLIL on the L2 French and L1 Dutch proficiency of Flemish secondary school pupils

References

• Admiraal, W., G. Westhoff, and C. de Bot. 2006. “Evaluation of Bilingual Secondary Education in The Netherlands: Students’ Language Proficiency in English.” Educational Research and Evaluation 12 (1): 75–93.
   Google Scholar
• Artieda, G., H. Roquet, and F. Nicolás-Conesa. 2020. “The Impact of Age and Exposure on EFL Achievement in Two Learning Contexts: Formal Instruction and Formal Instruction + Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23 (4): 449–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baten, K., S. Van Hiel, and L. De Cuypere. 2020. “Vocabulary Development in a CLIL Context: A Comparison Between French and English L2.” Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 10 (2): 307–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergroth, M. 2006. “Immersion Students in the Matriculation Examination Three Years After Immersion.” In Exploring Dual-Focussed Education. Integrating Language and Content for Individual and Societal Needs, edited by S. Björklund, K. Mård-Miettinen, M. Bergström, and M. Södergård. http://www.uwasa.fi/materiaali/pdf/isbn_952-476-149-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2011. “Is CLIL so Beneficial, or Just Selective? Re-evaluating Some of the Research.” System 39: 523–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulté, B., L. Martens, and J. Surmont. 2020. CLIL in Vlaanderen. UCLL. https://www.ucll.be/sites/default/files/documents/lerarenopleiding/_eindrapport_pwo_clil.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Castellano-Risco, I., R. Alejo-González, and A. M. Piquer-Píriz. 2020. “The Development of Receptive Vocabulary in CLIL vs EFL: Is the Learning Context the Main Variable?” System 91: 102263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., F. Genesee, and D. Gorter. 2014. “Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” Applied Linguistics 35 (3): 243–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., P. Hood, and D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dallinger, S., K. Jonkmann, J. Hollm, and C. Fiege. 2016. “The Effect of Content and Language Integrated Learning on Students’ English and History Competences–Killing Two Birds with One Stone?” Learning and Instruction 41: 23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2011. “Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles?” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 182–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., T. Nikula, and U. Smit. 2010. Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• De Bot, K. 2014. “TTO: het werkt!.” In Passie voor tweetalig onderwijs: een geschiedenis van 25 jaar succesvol onderwijs vernieuwen, edited by A. Koster, and L. van Putten, 72–83. Haarlem, Nederland: Europees Platform.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., and T. Taguchi. 2010. Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203864739
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. First European Survey on Language Competences: Final Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2766/34160 https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/42ea89dc-373a-4d4f-aa27-9903852cd2e4/language-en/format-PDF/source-116835286.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. 2006. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice European Unit. http://www.indire.it/lucabas/lkmw_file/eurydice/CLIL_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Feddermann, M., J. Möller, and J. Baumert. 2021. “Effects of CLIL on Second Language Learning: Disentangling Selection, Preparation, and CLIL-Effects.” Learning and Instruction 74: 101459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Sanjurjo, J., A. Fernández-Costales, and J. M. Arias Blanco. 2019. “Analysing Students’ Content-Learning in Science in CLIL vs. Non-CLIL Programmes: Empirical Evidence from Spain.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22 (6): 661–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemish government. 2013. Brochure Peiling Frans luisteren en spreken in de derde graad ASO, KSO en TSO van het secundair onderwijs. Brussels: Vlaams Ministerie van Onderwijs en Vorming. Accessed 17 June 2019. https://www.vlaanderen.be/publicaties/peiling-frans-in-de-derde-graad-aso-kso-en-tso.
   Google Scholar
• Flemish government. 2014. Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering tot bepaling van de kwaliteitsstandaard voor Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in het gewoon secundair onderwijs en de leertijd en aanwijzing van de bevoegde dienst voor de goedkeuring van de CLIL-plannen (februari 2014). Accessed 18 October 2019. http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/edulex/database/document/document.asp?docid = 14721.
   Google Scholar
• Flemish government. 2018. Brochure Peiling Frans in het basisonderwijs. Brussel: Vlaams Ministerie van Onderwijs en Vorming.
   Google Scholar
• Flemish Inspectorate of Education (2017). Twee jaar CLIL in het Vlaams secundair onderwijs: een evaluatie. Accessed 24 November 2019. http://www.onderwijsinspectie.be/sites/default/files/atoms/files/CLIL-RAPPORT%20met%20bijlagen%20-%2020170112.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gallardo del Puerto, F., and E. Gómez Lacabex. 2017. “Oral Production Outcomes in CLIL: An Attempt to Manage Amount of Exposure.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics 5 (1): 31–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goris, J., E. Denessen, and L. Verhoeven. 2013. “Effects of the Content and Language Integrated Learning Approach to EFL Teaching: A Comparative Study.” Written Language & Literacy 16 (2): 186–207.
   Google Scholar
• Goris, J., E. Denessen, and L. Verhoeven. 2019. “Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in Europe A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Experimental Studies.” European Educational Research Journal 18 (6): 675–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacquebord, H., B. Stellingwerf, R. Linthorst, and S. Andringa. 2005. Diataal. Verantwoording en Normering. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Accessed 6 June 2019. https://www.diatoetsen.nl/media/filer_public/3a/69/3a69b391-b0eb-4ebf-a0f7-18d5cde19403/diataal_-_Verantwoording_en_normering_2005_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Keskin, H. 2013. “Impacts of Reading Metacognitive Strategies and Reading Attitudes on School Success.” International Journal of Academic Research 5: 312–317.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, E., and C. Muñoz. 2013. “The Influence of Exposure, Parents, and Linguistic Distance on Young European Learners’ Foreign Language Comprehension.” International Journal of Multilingualism 10 (1): 105–129.
   Google Scholar
• Marian, V., H. K. Blumenfeld, and M. Kaushanskaya. 2007. “The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing Language Profiles in Bilinguals and Multilinguals.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50 (August): 940–967.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martens, L., and E. Voets. 2011. Eindrapport ‘stERK in Frans. School of Education, KU Leuven. Accessed 6 June 2019. https://associatie.kuleuven.be/schoolofeducation/projecten/sterk-in-frans.
   Google Scholar
• Merisuo-Storm, T. 2007. “Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Foreign-Language Learning and the Development of Literacy Skills in Bilingual Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 23 (2): 226–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettewie, L., and L. Van Mensel. 2020. “Understanding Foreign Language Education and Bilingual Education in Belgium: A (Surreal) Piece of Cake.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. doi:10.1080/13670050.2020.1768211.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerhöffer, N., and D. C. Dreesmann. 2019. “The Exclusive Language of Science? Comparing Knowledge Gains and Motivation in English-Bilingual Biology Lessons Between Non-Selected and Preselected Classes.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (1): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michavila, F. 2009. “Preface.” In English Language Teaching in the European Credit Transfer System: Facing the Challenge, edited by M. L. Pérez Cañado, 9–16. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro-Pablo, M., and Y. López Gándara. 2020. “The Effects of CLIL on L1 Competence Development in Monolingual Contexts.” The Language Learning Journal 48 (1): 18–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paran, A. 2013. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: Panacea or Policy Borrowing Myth?” Applied Linguistics Review 4 (2): 317–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, E., A. S. Noreillie, K. Heylen, B. Bulté, and P. Desmet. 2019. “The Impact of Instruction and Out-of-school Exposure to Foreign Language Input on Learners' Vocabulary Knowledge in Two Languages.” Language Learning 69 (3): 747–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Vidal, C., and H. Roquet. 2015. “The Linguistic Impact of a CLIL Science Programme: An Analysis Measuring Relative Gains.” System 54: 80–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. 2012. “CLIL Research in Europe: Past, Present, and Future.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15: 1–27. doi:10.1080/13670050.2011.630064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. 2018a. “CLIL and Educational Level: A Longitudinal Study on the Impact of CLIL on Language Outcomes.” Porta Linguarum 29: 51–70.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. 2018b. “The Effects of CLIL on L1 and Content Learning: Updated Empirical Evidence from Monolingual Contexts.” Learning and Instruction 57: 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piesche, N., K. Jonkmann, C. Fiege, and J. U. Keßler. 2016. “CLIL for All? A Randomised Controlled Field Experiment with Sixth-Grade Students on the Effects of Content and Language Integrated Science Learning.” Learning and Instruction 44: 108–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pladevall-Ballester, E., and A. Vallbona. 2016. “CLIL in Minimal Input Contexts: A Longitudinal Study of Primary School Learners’ Receptive Skills.” System 58: 37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. 2011. “Which Language Competencies Benefit from CLIL? An Insight into Applied Linguistics Research.” In Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning: Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. M. Sierra, and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 129–153. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Rumlich, D. 2017. “CLIL Theory and Empirical Reality–Two Sides of the Same Coin?: A Quantitative-Longitudinal Evaluation of General EFL Proficiency and Affective-Motivational Dispositions in CLIL Students at German Secondary Schools.” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 5 (1): 110–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumlich, D. 2020. “Bilingual Education in Monolingual Contexts: A Comparative Perspective.” The Language Learning Journal 48 (1): 115–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and J. P. Connell. 1989. “Perceived Locus of Causality and Internalization: Examining Reasons for Acting in Two Domains.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57: 749–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Isidro, X., and D. Lasagabaster. 2018. “The Impact of CLIL on Pluriliteracy Development and Content Learning in a Rural Multilingual Setting: A Longitudinal Study.” Language Teaching Research 23 (5): 584–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobbe, L., and L. Sercu. 2011. Wetenschappelijke begeleiding en evaluatie van de CLIL-proeftuinprojecten in het secundair onderwijs in Vlaanderen. Samenvatting van de onderzoeksresultaten en de aanbevelingen. Accessed 18 October 2014. www.ond.vlaanderen.be/obpwo/rapporten/clil/ER.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Surmont, J., E. Struys, and T. Somers. 2015. “Creating a Framework for a Large-Scale Implementation of Content and Language Integrated Learning.” European Journal of Language Policy 7 (1): 29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, T., M. Magid, and M. Papi. 2009. “The L2 Motivational Self System among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian Learners of English: A Comparative Study.” In Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self, edited by Z. Dörnyei, and E. Ushioda, 66–97. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, H.-L., C.-C. Chin, and S.-H. Shieh. 2005. “The Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Students’ Motivation Towards Science Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (6): 639–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, G., and G. Molenberghs. 2000. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Verspoor, M., K. de Bot, and X. Xu. 2015. “The Effects of English Bilingual Education in the Netherlands.” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 3 (1): 4–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waninge, F., Z. Dörnyei, and K. De Bot. 2014. “Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning: Change, Stability, and Context.” Modern Language Journal 98 (3): 704–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woumans, E., J. Surmont, E. Struys, and W. Duyck. 2016. “The Longitudinal Effect of Bilingual Immersion Schooling on Cognitive Control and Intelligence.” Language Learning 66 (S2): 76–91.
   Google Scholar