Analysing the impact of value added services at intermodal inland terminals

References

• Bernaerd, A. 2013. “Gate Automation & OCR, Intermodal Terminals.” Accessed 17 July 2018. http://www.intermodal-terminals.eu/content/e2/e543/inhalte550/6OCRWorkshopCAMCOPresentationBernaerd_eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, R. L., C. Soosay, and J. Kandampully. 2002. “Innovation in Logistic Services and the New Business Model: A Conceptual Framework.” Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 12 (6): 358–371. doi: 10.1108/09604520210451849
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. K., R. M. Tahar, and C. L. Ang. 2010. “Understanding the Complexity of Container Terminal Operation through the Development of System Dynamics Model.” International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 2 (4): 429–443. doi: 10.1504/IJSTL.2010.035503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, R. K., J. H. Tong, and B. Slack. 2003. “The Transition From Freight Consolidation to Logistics: The Case of Hong Kong.” Journal of Transport Geography 11 (4): 245–253. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(03)00020-6
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Crainic, T. G., and K. H. Kim. 2007. “Intermodal Transportation.” In Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Transportation, Chapter 8, edited by C. Barnhart and G. Laporte, Volume 4, 467–537. North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• de Langen, P. W. 2005. “Trends and Opportunities for the Long-term Development of Rotterdam's Port Complex.” Coastal Management 33 (2): 215–224. doi: 10.1080/08920750590919691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Langen, P. W., and A. Chouly. 2009. “Strategies of Terminal Operating Companies in Changing Environments.” International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 12 (6): 423–434. doi: 10.1080/13675560902775725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza Nascimento, P. T., and J. Petraglia. 2016. “Technological Innovation in the Logistics of Ethanol and a New Systemic Model of Innovation in Logistics.” International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management 24 (2): 137. doi: 10.1504/IJLSM.2016.076469
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. “Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union Guidelines for the Development of the Trans-European Transport Network and Repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU Text with EEA Relevance.” Official Journal of the European Union 348: 1–128.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, M. 2011. Port and Economy Relationship Analysis by System Dynamics, 162–167. Chengdu, China. Third International Conference on Transportation Engineering (ICTE).
   Google Scholar
• Gronalt, M., H. Haeuselmayer, M. Posset, and S. Royas-Navas. 2011. “Simcont - Theory and Practice in Simulation of Binnenland Container Terminals.” International Conference on Harbour, Maritime and Multimodal Logistics Modelling and Simulation 1: 155–160.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, E., and B. Urli. 2006. “Port Selection and Multicriteria Analysis: An Application to the Montreal-New York Alternative.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 8 (2): 169–186. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100152
   Google Scholar
• Haezendonck, E. 2007. Transport Project Evaluation: Extending the Social Cost-benefit Approach. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hales, D. N., Y. Chang, J. S. L. Lam, O. Desplebin, N. Dholakia, and A. Al-Wugayan. 2017. “An Empirical Test of the Balanced Theory of Port Competitiveness.” The International Journal of Logistics Management 28 (2): 363–378. doi: 10.1108/IJLM-06-2015-0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, K. H., M. W. Ho, and C. M. E. Hui. 2008. “Structural Dynamics in the Policy Planning of Large Infrastructure Investment Under the Competitive Environment: Context of Port Throughput and Capacity.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 134 (1): 9–20. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2008)134:1(9)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, W. K. K. 2013. “Improving the Service Operations of Container Terminals.” The International Journal of Logistics Management 24 (1): 101–116. doi: 10.1108/IJLM-05-2013-0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, J. S., K. S. Hwang, and H. J. Yeo. 2009. “Are Shippers Satisfied with the Diversified Provision of Logistics Service by Shipping Companies?: A Study Between the UK and South Korea.” The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 25 (2): 237–251. doi: 10.1016/S2092-5212(09)80004-7
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. W., J. Lam, C. W. Lin, K. C. Hu, and I. Cheong. 2018. “Developing the Fifth Generation Port Concept Model: An Empirical Test.” The International Journal of Logistics Management 29 (3): 1098–1120. doi: 10.1108/IJLM-10-2016-0239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lineas Intermodal. 2018. “Fast Lane Service.” Interview with Patrick Deschuytter.
   Google Scholar
• Lun, Y. H. V., and P. Cariou. 2009. “An Analytical Framework for Managing Container Terminals.” International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 1 (4): 419–436. doi: 10.1504/IJSTL.2009.027683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Z. 2010. Service Science and Logistics Informatics. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. P., and J. G. Covin. 2000. “Environmental Marketing: A Source of Reputational, Competitive, and Financial Advantage.” Journal of Business Ethics 23 (3): 299–311. doi: 10.1023/A:1006214509281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morecroft, J. D. W. 2015. Strategic Modelling and Business Dynamics. A Feedback Systems Approach. 2nd ed. Chichester , UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. 2009. “The Relationship between Seaports and the Inter-Modal Hinterland in Light of Global Supply Chains.” In Port Competition and Hinterland Connections. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OLAS. 1974. International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), as Amended. London, UK: International Maritime Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Oztanriseven, F., L. P. Lespier, S. Long, and H. L. Nachtmann. 2014. “A Review of System Dynamics in Maritime Transportation.” In Proceedings of the IIE Annual Conference and Expo (2014, Montreal, Canada), 2447–2456. Institute of Industrial Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Panayides, P. M., and D. W. Song. 2009. “Port Integration in Global Supply Chains: Measures and Implications for Maritime Logistics.” International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 12 (2): 133–145. doi: 10.1080/13675560902749407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Port of Rotterdam. 2018. “The Dutch Love the Port of Rotterdam.” Accessed 17 July 2018. https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/the-dutch-love-the-port-of-rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Posset, M., D. Gierlinger, M. Gronalt, H. Peherstorfer, H. Pripfl, and F. Starkl. 2014. Intermodaler Verkehr Europa. Steyr, Austria: FH OÖ Forschungs & Entwicklungs GmbH - Logistikum Steyr.
   Google Scholar
• Protic, S. M., H. Geerlings, and R. van Duin. 2018. “Environmental Sustainability of Freight Transportation Terminals.” In Sustainable Transportation and Smart Logistics, Chapter 9, edited by J. Faulin, S. Grasman, A. Juan and P. Hirsch. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Randers, J., and U. Göluke. 2007. “Forecasting Turning Points in Shipping Freight Rates: Lessons From 30 Years of Practical Effort.” System Dynamics Review 23 (2-3): 253–284. doi: 10.1002/sdr.376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J. P., and T. Notteboom. 2010. “Comparative North American and European Gateway Logistics: The Regionalism of Freight Distribution.” Journal of Transport Geography 18 (4): 497–507. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. 2010. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, NY, USA: Crown Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. 2014. “A Review of System Dynamics Models Applied in Transportation.” Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics 2 (2): 83–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, V., A. Coelho, A. Novaes, and O. F. Lima, Jr. 2011. “Remarks on Collaborative Maritime Transportation's Problem using System Dynamics and Agent Based Modeling and Simulation Approaches.” Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Slack, N., S. Chambers, and R. Johnston. 2010. Operations Management. Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall, Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Song, D. W., and P. M. Panayides. 2008. “Global Supply Chain and Port/terminal: Integration and Competitiveness.” Maritime Policy & Management 35 (1): 73–87. doi: 10.1080/03088830701848953
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D. 2000. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. HD30. 2 S7835 2000.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 1993. Strategic Planning for Port Authorities, Report by the UNCTAD Secretariat. Geneva: Trade and Development Board, Standing Committee on Developing Services Sector, Intergovernmental Group of Port Experts.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 1994. Port Marketing and the Challenge of the Third Generation Port, Report by the UNCTAD Secretariat. Geneva: Trade and Development Board, Standing Committee on Developing Services Sector, Intergovernmental Group of Port Experts.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2001. “Economic Commission for Europe. Terminology on Combined Transport.” Accessed 21 January 2019. http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/wp24/documents/term.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegmans, B. W., A. V. D. Hoest, and T. E. Notteboom. 2008. “Port and Terminal Selection by Deep-sea Container Operators.” Maritime Policy & Management 35 (6): 517–534. doi: 10.1080/03088830802469329
   Google Scholar
• Wiegmans, B. W., E. Masurel, and P. Nijkamp. 1999. “Intermodal Freight Terminals: An Analysis of the Terminal Market.” Transportation Planning and Technology 23 (2): 105–128. doi: 10.1080/03081069908717643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WienCont Container Terminal GmbH. 2018. “OCR Gate.” Personal interview with Waltraud Pamminger and Robert Spiessmaier.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2007. “Port Reform Toolkit Module 3: Alternative Port Management Structures and Ownership Models.” Accessed 19 June 2018. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPRAL/Resources/338897-1117197012403/mod3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. C. 2012. “Assessing the Moderating Effect of Innovation Capability on the Relationship Between Logistics Service Capability and Firm Performance for Ocean Freight Forwarders.” International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 15 (1): 53–69. doi: 10.1080/13675567.2012.669469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, G. T., J. Y. Pak, and Z. Yang. 2013. “Analysis of Dynamic Effects on Seaports Adopting Port Security Policy.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 49: 285–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, W., and A. V. Goodchild. 2010. “The Impact of Truck Arrival Information on Container Terminal Rehandling.” Transportation Research Part E 46 (3): 327–343. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2009.11.007
   Google Scholar