The post-80s generation: exploring the attitudes toward family and housing

References

• Aassve, A., E. Cottini, and A. Vitali. 2013. “Youth Prospects in a Time of Economic Recession.” Demographic Research 29: 949–962. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alston, M., and J. Kent. 2009. “Generation X-Pendable: The Social Exclusion of Rural and Remote Young People.” Journal of Sociology 45: 89–107. doi: 10.1177/1440783308099988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arundel, R., and R. Ronald. 2016. “Parental Co-residence, Shared Living and Emerging Adulthood in Europe: Semi-Dependent Housing across Welfare Regime and Housing System Contexts.” Journal of Youth Studies 19 (7): 885–905. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2015.1112884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attias-Donfut, C., and S. Arber. 2000. “Equity and Solidarity across the Generations.” In The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and State in Ageing Societies, Vol. 2, edited by S. Arber, and C. Attias-Donfut, 1. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, A., D. Faulkner, and C. Paris. 2011. Housing Transitions through the Life Course: Aspirations, Needs and Policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Shahar, D., and J. Warszawski. 2016. “Inequality in Housing Affordability: Measurement and Estimation.” Urban Studies 53: 1178–1202. doi: 10.1177/0042098015572529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billari, F. C., and A. C. Liefbroer. 2007. “Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Impact of Age Norms on Leaving Home.” Demography 44: 181–198. doi: 10.1353/dem.2007.0000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnin, M. 2006. “The ‘Lost Generation’: Its Definition and Its Role in Today’s Chinese Elite Politics.” Social Research 73 (1): 245–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebulla, A. 2009. “Risk Through the Years - A Statistical Portrait of Young People’s Risk Perceptions and Experiences Relative to Those of Older Generations.” Journal of Youth Studies 12: 39–56. doi: 10.1080/13676260802392932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, H., and R. P. Lee. 1995. “Hong Kong Families: At the Crossroads of Modernism and Traditionalism.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 26: 83–99. doi: 10.3138/jcfs.26.1.83
   Google Scholar
• Chow, N. W. 2002. “Ageing in Hong Kong.” In Ageing in the Asia-Pacific Region, 176–191. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, N., and T. Lum. 2008. Trends in Family Attitudes and Values in Hong Kong: Final Report Submitted to Central Policy Unit, Hong Kong SAR Government. Accessed January 19, 2019. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/37979967.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, D. F. 2005. The Meaning of Housing: A Pathways Approach. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb-Clark, D. A. 2008. “Leaving Home: What Economics Has to Say About the Living Arrangements of Young Australians.” Australian Economic Review 41: 160–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8462.2008.00488.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, L., A. Powell, and J. E. Brown. 2015. “Co-resident Parents and Young People Aged 15–34: Who Does What Housework?” Social Indicators Research 121: 569–588. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0643-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempographia. 2019. 15th Annual Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey. Christchurch, New Zealand: Performance Urban Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Census and Statistics. 2012. 2011 Population Census- Main Report: Volume I. Accessed March 2, 2018. https://www.census2011.gov.hk/pdf/main-report-volume-I.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, F. M. 2006. “Filial Piety, Patrilineality, and China’s One-Child Policy.” Journal of Family Issues 27 (3): 366–389. doi: 10.1177/0192513X05283097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermisch, J. 1999. “Prices, Parents, and Young People’s Household Formation.” Journal of Urban Economics 45: 47–71. doi: 10.1006/juec.1998.2083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2009. Youth in Europe: A Statistical Portrait. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J., J. Rugg, and R. Burrows. 2002. “Conceptualising the Contemporary Role of Housing in the Transition to Adult Life in England.” Urban Studies 39: 2455–2467. doi: 10.1080/0042098022000027059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, R. 2018. “Housing and Asset Based Stratification in the Enrichment Economy.” Critical Housing Analysis 5 (2): 4–13. doi: 10.13060/23362839.2018.5.2.438
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, R., and Y. Hirayama. 2009. “The Uneven Impact of Neoliberalism on Housing Opportunities.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33 (4): 998–1013. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00903.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, R., and Y. Hirayama. 2018. “Late Home Ownership and Social Re-stratification.” Economy and Society 47 (2): 257–279. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2018.1459368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, R., and S. Xian. 2018. “Accommodating Discontent: Youth, Conflict and the Housing Question in Hong Kong.” Housing Studies 33 (2): 1–17. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2017.1342775
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, R., and N. M. Yip, eds. 2013. Young People and Housing: Transitions, Trajectories and Generational Fractures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• France, A., and S. Roberts. 2015. “The Problem of Social Generations: A Critique of the New Emerging Orthodoxy in Youth Studies.” Journal of Youth Studies 18 (2): 215–230. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2014.944122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuster, N., R. Arundel, and J. Susino. 2019. “From a Culture of Homeownership to Generation Rent: Housing Discourses of Young Adults in Spain.” Journal of Youth Studies 22 (5): 585–603. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2018.1523540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Z., and L. Meng. 2007. “‘80 Hou’ xianxiang de guiyin ji duice fenxi (The Attribution of ‘Post-Eighties’ Phenomenon and Strategic Analysis).” China Youth Study 10: 76–79.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, J. M., K. Siu, and W. Y. Ho. 2014. “The ‘Post-80s Generation’, ‘Young Night Drifters’, and the Construction of a Generic Youth Subject in Hong Kong.” Journal of Youth Studies 17: 829–846. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2013.878795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haurin, D. R., P. H. Hendershott, and S. M. Wachter. 1997. “Borrowing Constraints and the Tenure Choice of Young Households.” Journal of Housing Research 8: 137–154.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstenbach, C., and W. R. Boterman. 2015. “Navigating the Field of Housing: Housing Pathways of Young People in Amsterdam.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 30: 257–274. doi: 10.1007/s10901-014-9405-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holroyd, E. 2001. “Hong Kong Chinese Daughters’ Intergenerational Caregiving Obligations: A Cultural Model Approach.” Social Science & Medicine 53 (9): 1125–1134. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00406-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, F. Z., and K. L. Chou. 2016. “Understanding the Transition to Independent Living among Urban Youth: A Decomposition Analysis for Hong Kong.” Habitat International 51: 141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. 1995. Leaving Home. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kain, J. F., and J. M. Quigley. 1972. “Housing Market Discrimination, Home-Ownership, and Savings Behavior.” The American Economic Review 62: 263–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K. 2000. “Hong Kong’s Family Trends and their Policy Implications.” In Keynote Speech Presented at the HKSAR Central Policy Unit Seminar on Hong Kong’s Families in Transition: Trends and Policy Implications, Hong Kong, China.
   Google Scholar
• Legal and General. 2018. The Bank of Mum and Dad. Last Accessed February 12, 2019. https://www.legalandgeneral.com/retirement/retirement-news/2018/bank-of-mum-and-dad-report-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lennartz, C., R. Arundel, and R. Ronald. 2016. “Younger Adults and Homeownership in Europe through the Global Financial Crisis.” Population, Space and Place 22 (8): 823–835. doi: 10.1002/psp.1961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, T. 2012. “The Legacy of Leaving Home: Long-Term Effects of Coresidence on Parent–Child Relationships.” Journal of Marriage and Family 74: 399–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00964.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J. 2014. “‘I Am Not Leaving Home’: Post-80s’ Housing Attitudes and Aspirations in Hong Kong.” Urban Research Group-Cityuoncities Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Lian, H. 2014. “The Post-1980s Generation in China: Exploring Its Theoretical Underpinning.” Journal of Youth Studies 17: 965–981. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2013.878786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., F. Bian, and Y. Bian. 1998. “Tradition and Change in the Urban Chinese Family: The Case of Living Arrangements.” Social Forces 76: 851–882. doi: 10.2307/3005696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. 1952. “The Problem of Generations.” In Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, edited by P. Kecskemeti, 276–322. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, K. 2012. “Young People, Homeownership and Future Welfare.” Housing Studies 27: 853–862. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2012.714463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natalier, K., and G. Johnson. 2012. “Housing Pathways of Young People Who Have Left Out-of-Home State Care.” Housing, Theory and Society 29: 75–91. doi: 10.1080/14036096.2011.592215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, R., and W. C. Wheaton. 1994. “Effects of Restrictive Land Supply on Housing in Hong Kong: an Econometric Analysis.” Journal of Housing Research 5: 263.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, Z. S. 1947. Fortress Besieged. Translated by Jeanne Kelly and Nathan K. Mao. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J., P. Noden, A. West, and J. Lewis. 2016. “Living with the Parents: The Purpose of Young Graduates’ Return to the Parental Home in England.” Journal of Youth Studies 19 (3): 319–337. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2015.1072618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, N. B. 1965. “The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social Change.” American Sociological Review 30 (6): 843–861. doi: 10.2307/2090964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabet, D. 2011. “Confucian or Communist, Post-Mao or Postmodern? Exploring the Narrative Identity Resources of Shanghai’s Post-80s Generation.” Symbolic Interaction 34 (4): 536–551. doi: 10.1525/si.2011.34.4.536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H. 1963. “Some Recent Developments in Socialization Theory and Research.” Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science 349 (1): 163–181. doi: 10.1177/000271626334900115
   Google Scholar
• Sheahan, P. 2005. Generation Y: Thriving and Surviving with Generation Y at Work. Prahran: Hardy Grant.
   Google Scholar
• Stanat, M. 2006. China’s Generation Y: Understanding the Future Leaders of the World’s Next Superpower. Paramus, NJ: Homa & Sekey Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, J., A. Berrington, and J. Falkingham. 2014. “Gender, Turning Points, and Boomerangs: Returning Home in Young Adulthood in Great Britain.” Demography 51 (1): 257–276. doi: 10.1007/s13524-013-0247-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulgan, B., and C. A. Martin. 2001. Managing Generation Y: Global Citizens Born in the Late Seventies and Early Eighties. Amherst: Human Resource Development.
   Google Scholar
• Varley, A. 1993. “Gender and Housing: The Provision of Accommodation for Young Adults in Three Mexican Cities.” Habitat International 17: 13–30. doi: 10.1016/0197-3975(93)90026-9
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, D., and J. Wyn. 2015a. Youth and Generation: Rethinking Change and Inequality in the Lives of Young People. Los Angeles; London; Delhi; Singapore; Washington, DC: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, D., and J. Wyn. 2015b. “Class, Gender and Generation Matter: Using the Concept of Social Generation to Study Inequality and Social Change.” Journal of Youth Studies 18 (10): 1402–1410. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2015.1048206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyn, J., and D. Woodman. 2006. “Generation, Youth and Social Change in Australia.” Journal of Youth Studies 9 (5): 495–514. doi: 10.1080/13676260600805713
   Google Scholar
• Yip, N. M. 2013. “Homeownership, Cohort Trajectories and Hong Kong’s Post-Eighties Generation.” In Young People and Housing: Transitions, Trajectories and Generational Fractures, edited by R. Forrest, and N. M. Yip, 122–140. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yip, N. M., and R. Forrest. 2014. “Choice or Constraint? Exploring Solo–Living for Young Households in Hong Kong.” Urban Research Group–Cityuoncities Working Paper Series, WP No. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Yip, N. M., R. Forrest, and A. La Grange. 2007. “Cohort Trajectories in Hong Kong’s Housing System: 1981–2001.” Housing Studies 22: 121–136. doi: 10.1080/02673030601024655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar