References
- Barlett, A., and G. Mercer, Eds. 2001. Postgraduate Research Supervision: Transforming (R)Elations. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
- Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Bryman, A. 2006. “Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How Is It Done?” Qualitative Research 6 (1): 97–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877.
- Connor, M., and J. Pokora. 2012. Coaching and Mentoring at Work: Developing Effective Practice. 2nd ed. New York: Open University Press.
- Cook, J. 2011. “The effect of coaching on the transfer and sustainability of learning: coaching for leaders, a collaborative action research study.” DCM Thesis, Oxford Brookes University.
- Cox, E. 2013. Coaching Understood: A Pragmatic Enquiry into the Coaching Process. London: Sage.
- Dolorient, C., S. Sambrook, and J. Stewart. 2012. “Power and Emotion in Doctoral Supervision: Implications for HRD.” European Journal of Training and Development 36 (7): 732–750. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211255566.
- Franke, A., and B. Arvidsson. 2011. “Research Supervisors’ Different Ways of Experiencing Supervision of Doctoral Students.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (1): 7–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903402151.
- Godskersen, M., and S. Kobayashi. 2016. “Coaching Doctoral Students – A Means to Enhance Progress and Support Self-Organisation in Doctoral Education.” Studies in Continuing Education 38 (2): 145–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2015.1055464.
- Green, S., and T. Bauer. 1995. “Supervisory Mentoring by Advisers: Relationships with Doctoral Student Potential, Productivity and Commitment.” Personnel Psychology 48 (3): 537–562. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01769.x.
- Guerin, C., H. Kerr, and I. Green. 2015. “Supervision Pedagogies: Narratives from the Field.” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (1): 107–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.957271.
- Gyllensten, K., and S. Palmer. 2007. “The Coaching Relationship: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.” International Coaching Psychology Review 2 (2): 168–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2015.1055464.
- Hamlin, R., A. Ellinger, and R. Beattie. 2008. “The Emergent ‘Coaching Industry’: A Wake-Up Call for HRD Professionals.” Human Resource Development International 11 (3): 287–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860802102534.
- Hui, R., C. Sue-Chan, and R. Wood. 2013. “The Contrasting Effects of Coaching Style on Task Performance: The Mediating Roles of Subjective Task Complexity and Self-Set Goal.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 24 (4): 429–458. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21170.
- Ives, Y. 2008. “What Is ‘Coaching’? an Exploration of Conflicting Paradigms.” International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring 6 (2): 100–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.24384/IJEBCM/6/2.
- Joseph, S., and R. Bryant-Jefferies. 2007. “Person Centred Coaching Psychology.” In Handbook of Coaching Psychology, edited by S. Palmer. and A. Whybrow, 211–228. East Sussex: Routledge.
- Kearns, H., M. Gardiner, and K. Marshall. 2008. “Innovation in PhD Completion: The Hardy Shall Succeed (And Be Happy!).” Higher Education Research and Development 27 (1): 77–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658781.
- Law, H., S. Ireland, and K. Hussain. 2007. The Psychology of Coaching, Mentoring and Learning. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons .
- Lee, A. 2008. ““How are Doctoral Students Supervised?” Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 267–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202.
- Lee, A. 2018. “How Can We Develop Supervisors for the Modern Doctorate?” Studies in Higher Education 43 (5): 878–890. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438116.
- Leonard, D. 2001. A Woman’s Guide to Doctoral Studies. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Maguire, K., M. Prodi, and P. Gibbs. 2018. “Minding the Gap in Doctoral Supervision for a Contemporary World: A Case from Italy.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (5): 867–877. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438114.
- McCarthy, G. 2012. “The Case for Coaching as an Approach to Addressing Challenges in Doctoral Supervision.” International Journal of Organisational Behaviour 17 (1): 15–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2015.1055464.
- Natale, S. M., and T. Diamante. 2005. “The Five Stages of Executive Coaching: Better Process Makes Better Practice.” Journal of Business Ethics 59 (4): 361–374. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0382-2.
- Olivero, G., K. D. Bane, and R. E. Kopelman. 1997. “Executive Coaching as a Transfer of Training Tool: Effects on Productivity in a Public Agency.” Public Personnel Management 26 (4): 461–470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0382-2.
- Paglis, L., S. Green, and T. Bauer. 2006. “Does Adviser Mentoring Add Value? A Longitudinal Study of Mentoring and Doctoral Student Outcomes.” Research in Higher Education 47 (4): 451–476. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9003-2.
- Pearson, M., and C. Kayrooz. 2004. “Enabling Critical Reflection on Research Supervisory Practice.” International Journal of Academic Development 9: 99–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144042000296107.
- Schön, D. 1991. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
- Vilkinas, T. 2007. “An Exploratory Study of the Supervision of PhD/Research Students’ Theses.” Innovative Higher Education 32: 297–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-007-9057-5.
- The Vitae Researcher Development Framework. 2018. Accessed 15 August 2018. https://www.vitae.ac.uk/researchers-professional-development/about-the-vitae-researcher-development-framework/developing-the-vitae-researcher-development-framework.
- Wisker, G. 2015. “Developing Doctoral Authors: Engaging with Theoretical Perspectives through the Literature Review.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (1): 64–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981841.
- Zeegars, M., and D. Barron. 2012. “Pedagogical Concerns in Doctoral Supervision: A Challenge for Pedagogy.” Quality Assurance in Higher Education 20 (1): 20–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/0968488121119821.