Analysing HRD research in the UK research excellence framework

References

• Broadbent, J. 2010. “The UK Research Assessment Exercise: Performance Management and Resource Allocation.” Australian Accounting Review 20 (1): 14–23. doi:10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00076.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, L., and I. McAllister. 2009. “Metrics or Peer Review? Evaluating the 2001 UK: Research Assessment Exercise in Political Science.” Political Studies Review 7 (1): 3–17. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9299.2008.00167.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavarro, D., and I. Rafols 2018. “Research assessments based on journal rankings systematically marginalise knowledge from certain regions and subjects.” Accessed 25 December 2018. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/10/30/research-assessments-based-on-journal-rankings-systematically-marginalise-knowledge-from-certain-regions-and-subjects/?fbclid=IwAR3Jcsjeum-yBOqoKxI23OBngyPm5oMfbJxj92caS5we699Svrl1Z0edI84
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., and A. Zachmeier. 2015. “HRD Educators’ Views on Teaching and Learning: An International Perspective [Special Issue].” Advances in Developing Human Resources 17 (2): 145–161. doi:10.1177/1523422315572618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, R., and J. Stewart. 2011. “What Is HRD? A Definitional Review and Synthesis of the HRD Domain.” Journal of European Industrial Training 35 (3): 199–220. doi:10.1108/03090591111120377.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. 2012. “Performance-Based University Research Funding Systems.” Research Policy 41 (2): 251–498. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, S. 2015. “Journal List Fetishism and the ‘Sign of 4ʹ in the ABS Guide: A Question of Trust?” Organization 22 (1): 119–138. doi:10.1177/1350508413506763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, F. S. 2007. “The Research Assessment Exercise, the State and the Dominance of Mainstream Economics in British Universities.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 31 (2): 309–325. doi:10.1093/cje/bel021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. 2001. “A Refusal to Define HRD.” Human Resource Development International 4 (3): 327–341. doi:10.1080/13678860110059348.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, S., K. Trehan, and J. Stewart. 2014. “Academics in Pursuit of the Part-Time Doctorate: Pressures and Support Issues Associated with the Career Development of Business and Management Academics.” Human Resource Development International 17 (4): 438–458. doi:10.1080/13678868.2014.928136.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. “Performance-Based Funding for Public Research in Tertiary Education Institutions: Workshop Proceedings.” OECD Publishing. Accessed 07 February 2016. doi:10.1787/9789264094611-en.
   Google Scholar
• Ozbilgin, M. F. 2009. “From Journal Rankings to Making Sense of the World.” Academy of Management Learning and Education 8 (1): 113–121. doi:10.5465/amle.2009.37012185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidd, M., and J. Broadbent. 2015. “Business and Management Studies in the 2014 Research Excellence Framework.” British Journal of Management 26: 569–581. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafols, I., L. Leydesdorff, A. O’Hare, P. Nightingale, and A. Stirling. 2012. “How Journal Rankings Can Suppress Interdisciplinary Research: A Comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management.” Research Policy 41 (7): 1262–1282. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REF. 2014a. “Results & submissions, unit of analysis 19 - business & management studies.” Accessed 18 October 2015. http://results.ref.ac.uk/Results/ByUoa/19
   Google Scholar
• REF. 2014b. “Overview report by main panel c and sub-panels 16–26.” Accessed 18 October 2015. http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/expanel/member/Main%20Panel%20C%2 0overvie w%20report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• REF. 2014c. “Sub-panel 19 collated minutes.” Accessed 21 February 2016. http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/expanel/minutes/Sub- panel%2019%20- %20collated%20minutes.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Rigg, C., J. Stewart, and K. Trehan. 2006. “Introduction: A Critical Take on A Critical Turnin HRD.” In Critical Human Resource Development: Beyond Orthodoxy, edited by C. Rigg, J. Stewart, and K. Trehan, 1–16. Harlow: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. 2002. Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner Researchers. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sambrook, S., and J. Stewart. 2010. “Teaching, Learning and Assessing HRD [Special Issue].” Journal of European Industrial Training 34: 710–734. doi:10.1108/03090591011080931.
   Google Scholar
• Sambrook, S., and H. Willmott. 2014. “The Rigor of Management Education and the Relevance of Human Resource Development - Natural Partners or Uneasy Bedfellows in Management Practice?” Management Learning 45 (1): 39–56. doi:10.1177/1350507612468422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. 2000. “Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description?” Research in Nursing and Health 23 (4): 334–340. doi:10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangster, A. 2015. “You Cannot Judge a Book by Its Cover: The Problems with Journal Rankings.” Accounting Education 24 (3): 175–186. doi:10.1080/09639284.2015.1055929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. 2006. “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data.” American Journal of Evaluation 2 (2): 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748.
   Google Scholar
• Tourish, D., and H. Willmott. 2015. “In Defiance of Folly: Journal Rankings, Mindless Measures and the ABS Guide.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 26: 37–46. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2014.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufford, L., and P. Newman. 2010. “Bracketing in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Social Work 11 (1): 80–96. doi:10.1177/1473325010368316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, J. 2003. “How Shall a Thing Be Called? an Argumentation on the Efficacy of the Term HRD.” Human Resource Development Review 2 (3): 310–326. doi:10.1177/1534484303256222.
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, H. 2011. “Journal List Fetishism and the Perversion of Scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS List.” Organization 18 (4): 429–442. doi:10.1177/1350508411403532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar