Publishing quantitative research: exploring the peer-review process and manuscript acceptance rates

References

• Alexander, P. A. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: The art and science of quality systematic reviews. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319854352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beretvas, S. N. (2018). Meta-analysis. In G. R. Hancock, L. M. Stapleton, & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 260–268). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Björk, B. (2019). Acceptance rates of scholarly peer-reviewed journals: A literature survey. El profesional de la información, 28(4), e280407. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk, B. (2021). Publishing speed and acceptance rates of open access megajournals. Online Information Review, 45(2), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2018-0151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, A., Henriques, I. B., Husted, W., & Matten, D. (2017). Twelve tips for getting published in business & society. Business & Society, 56(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316682560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, D. R., Marschall, E. A., & Stein, R. A. (2009). Exploring the peer review process: What is it, does it work, and can it be improved? Fisheries, 34(6), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446-34.6.270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Cheung, C. M. K., Conboy, K., Duan, Y., Dubey, R., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Sigala, M., & Viglia, G. (2022). Editorial: How to develop a quality research article and avoid a journal desk rejection. International Journal of Information Management, 62(1), 102426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102426
   Google Scholar
• Franco, A., Malhotra, N., and Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, R., & Reio, T. G. (2013). Career benefits associated with mentoring for mentors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, T. X., Dai, X., & Yang, Y. (2023). Benchmarking ChatGPT for prototyping theories: Experimental studies using the technology acceptance model. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(4), 100153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2024.100153
   Google Scholar
• Horbach, S. P. J. M., & Halffman, W. (2018). The changing forms and expectations of peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 3(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0051-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacob, R. T., Doolittle, F., Kemple, J., & Somers, M. (2019). A framework for learning from null results. Educational Researcher, 48(9), 580–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, L. V., & Steinbach, T. A. (2008). Selecting an appropriate publication outlet: A comprehensive model of journal selection criteria for researchers in a broad range of academic disciplines. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 3(2), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.28945/51
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, C. R., & Adams, C. A. (2012). Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer‐reviewed journals in 212. Equine Veterinary Journal, 47(6), 736–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12376
   Google Scholar
• Lerback, J. C., Hanson, B., & Wooden, P. (2020). Association between author diversity and acceptance rates and citations in peer‐reviewed earth science manuscripts. Earth & Space Science, 7(5), e2019EA000946. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munafò, M., & Neill, J. (2016). Null is Beautiful: On the importance of publishing null results. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 30(7), 585–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reio, T. G., Jr. (2021). The ten research questions: An analytic tool for critiquing empirical studies and teaching research rigor. Human Resource Development Review, 20(3), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843211025182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reio, T. G. (2023). An editor’s learning journey: Lessons for moving the field forward. Human Resource Development Review, 22(3), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843231165618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, D. B., & Shamoo, A. E. (2017). Reproducibility and research integrity. Accountability in Research, 24(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1257387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roldan-Valadez, E., Salazar-Ruiz, S. Y., Ibarra-Contreras, R., & Rios, C. (2019). Current concepts on bibliometrics: A brief review about impact factor, eigenfactor score, citescore, scimago journal rank, source-normalised impact per paper, H-index, and alternative metrics. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 188(3), 939–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1936-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, J., Sbaffi, L., Sugden, M., & Gilbert, A. (2022). Factors influencing researchers’ journal selection decisions. Journal of Information Science, 48(3), 321–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2024). Dancing with the devil: The use and perceptions of academic journal ranking lists in the management field. Journal of Documentation. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2023-0217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skopec, M., Issa, H., Reed, J., & Harris, M. (2020). The role of geographic bias in knowledge diffusion: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0088-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tadajewski, M. (2016). Academic labour, journal ranking lists and the politics of knowledge production in marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(102), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1120508
   Google Scholar
• Weller, A. C. (2001). Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses. Information Today. ISBN 1-57387-000-1.
   Google Scholar