Evaluating 3D local descriptors for future LIDAR missiles with automatic target recognition capabilities

References

• Kechagias-Stamatis O, Aouf N. Histogram of distances for local surface description. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Stockholm: IEEE; 2016. p. 2487–2493.
   Google Scholar
• Salti S, Tombari F, Di Stefano L. SHOT: unique signatures of histograms for surface and texture description. Comput Vis Image Underst. 2014;125:251–264. doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2014.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson AE, Hebert M. Using spin images for efficient object recognition in cluttered 3D scenes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1999;21:433–449. doi: 10.1109/34.765655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Sohel F, Bennamoun M, et al. Rotational projection statistics for 3D local surface description and object recognition. Int J Comput Vis. 2013;105:63–86. doi: 10.1007/s11263-013-0627-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Sohel F, Bennamoun M, et al. A novel local surface feature for 3D object recognition under clutter and occlusion. Inform Sci. 2015;293:196–213. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusu RB, Blodow N, Beetz M. Fast point feature histograms (FPFH) for 3D registration. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Kobe: IEEE; 2009. p. 3212–3217.
   Google Scholar
• Frome A, Huber D, Kolluri R, et al. Recognizing objects in range data using regional point descriptors. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Prague; 2004. p. 224–237.
   Google Scholar
• Tombari F, Salti S, Di Stefano L. Unique shape context for 3d data description. 3DOR '10 Proceedings of the ACM workshop on 3D object retrieval. New York, (NY), USA: ACM Press; 2010. p. 57.
   Google Scholar
• Aldoma A, Marton Z-C, Tombari F, et al. Tutorial: point cloud library: three-dimensional object recognition and 6 DOF pose estimation. IEEE Robot Autom Mag. 2012;19:80–91. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2012.2206675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Bennamoun M, Sohel F, et al. 3D object recognition in cluttered scenes with local surface features: a survey. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2014;36:2270–2287. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2316828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bariya P, Novatnack J, Schwartz G, et al. 3D geometric scale variability in range images: features and descriptors. Int J Comput Vis. 2012;99:232–255. doi: 10.1007/s11263-012-0526-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taati B, Greenspan M. Local shape descriptor selection for object recognition in range data. Comput Vis Image Underst. 2011;115:681–694. doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2010.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandre L. 3D descriptors for object and category recognition: a comparative evaluation. Work. Color. Camera Fusion Robot. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vilamoura Algarve; 2012. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Bennamoun M, Sohel F, et al. A comprehensive performance evaluation of 3D local feature descriptors. Int J Comput Vis. 2016;116:66–89. doi: 10.1007/s11263-015-0824-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasile A, Marino R. Pose-independent automatic target detection and recognition using 3D laser radar imagery. Lincoln Lab J. 2005;15:61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Grönwall C. Ground object recognition using laser radar data: geometric fitting, performance analysis, and applications [ Thesis]. Linköping: Linköping University; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Xiaofeng Li XL, Jun Xu JX, Jijun Luo JL, et al. Ground target recognition based on imaging LADAR point cloud data. Chin Opt Lett. 2012;10:S11002–311005. doi: 10.3788/COL201210.S11002
   Google Scholar
• Roy S, Maheux J. Baseline processing pipeline for fast automatic target detection and recognition in airborne 3D ladar imagery. Proc. SPIE 8049, Automatic Target Recognition XXI, Orlando; 2011. p. 80490S1-11.
   Google Scholar
• Tombari F, Salti S, Di Stefano L. Performance evaluation of 3D keypoint detectors. Int J Comput Vis. 2013;102:198–220. doi: 10.1007/s11263-012-0545-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz S, Tal A, Basri R. Direct visibility of point sets. ACM Trans Graph. 2007;26:24. doi: 10.1145/1276377.1276407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Sohel F, Bennamoun M, et al. TriSI : a distinctive local surface descriptor for 3D modeling and object recognition. 8th International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Applications, Barcelona; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Muja M, Lowe DG. Fast approximate nearest neighbors with automatic algorithm configuration. Lisboa: VISAPP International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications; 2009. p. 331–340.
   Google Scholar
• Gronwall C. Ground target recognition using rectangle estimation. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2006;15:3400–3408. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2006.881965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldoma A, Tombari F, Di Stefano L, et al. A global hypotheses verification method for 3D object recognition. Comput. Vision--ECCV 2012. Firenze: Springer; 2012. p. 511–524.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H, Bhanu B. 3D free-form object recognition in range images using local surface patches. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2007;28:1252–1262. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2007.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presagis. OpenFlight visual simulation [Internet]. [cited 2016 Aug 1]. Available from: http://www.presagis.com/products_services/standards/openflight/.
   Google Scholar
• Dios F, Rodrigues A, Comeron A. Scintillation and beam-wander analysis in an optical ground station-satellite uplink. Appl Opt. 2004;43:3866–3873. doi: 10.1364/AO.43.003866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar