Dominating direction based an efficient copy–move image tampering detection technique

References

• Singh D, Shivani S, Agarwal S. Quantization based fragile watermarking using block wise authentication and pixel wise recovery scheme for tampered image. Int. J. Image Graph. 2013;13(2):1340002-1–1340002-11.
   Google Scholar
• Shivani S, Singh D, Agarwal S. DCT based approach for tampered image detection and recovery using block wise fragile watermarking scheme. Proceedings of International Conference on 6th Iberian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, Portugal, 2013, 640–647, Springer LNCS.
   Google Scholar
• Shivani S, Patel A, Kamble S, et al. An efficient pixel wise fragile watermarking scheme based on ARA bits. Proceedings of International Conference on Communication, Computing and Security (ICCCS), Rourkela, 12–14 February 2011, 221–226.
   Google Scholar
• Amerini I, Ballan L, Caldelli R, et al. Copy-move forgery detection and localization by means of robust clustering with J-linkage. Signal Process. Image Commun. 2013;28:659–669. doi: 10.1016/j.image.2013.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashmia FM, Anand, V, Keskar, GA, Copy-move image forgery detection using an efficient and robust method combining un-decimated wavelet transform and scale invariant feature transform. Proceedings of the 2014 AASRI Conference on Circuit and Signal Processing (CSP 2014), 2014, 84–91.
   Google Scholar
• Ardizzone E, Bruno A, Mazzola G. Copy–move forgery detection by matching triangles of keypoints. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2016;10:2084–2094. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2015.2445742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing L, Shao C. Image copy-move forgery detecting based on local invariant feature. J. Multimed. 2012;7:90–97. doi: 10.4304/jmm.7.1.90-97
   Google Scholar
• Fridrich J, Soukal D, Lukas J. Detection of copy-move forgery in digital images. Digital Forensics Research Workshop. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Lu W, Sun W, et al. Improved DCT-based detection of copy-move forgery in images. Forensic. Sci. Int. 2011;206:178–184. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Guo J. Passive forensics for copy-move image forgery using a method based on DCT and SVD. Forensic. Sci. Int. 2013;233:158–166. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik R, Bajaj KR, Mathew J. On image forgery detection using two-dimensional discrete cosine transform and statistical moments. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Eco-friendly Computing and Communication Systems, Procedia Computer Science. 2015;70:130–136.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu A, Farid H. Exposing digital forgeries by detecting duplicated image regions, Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College. Technical Report. 2004; TR2004-515:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kang X and Wei MS, Identifying tampered regions using singular value decomposition in digital image forensics. Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bashar KM, Noda K, Ohnishi N, et al. Exploring duplicated regions in natural images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010;1:1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdian B, Saic S. Detection of copy-move forgery using a method based on blur moment invariants. Forensic. Sci. Int. 2007;171:180–189. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, Wang J, Lian S, et al. A passive image authentication scheme for detecting region-duplication forgery with rotation. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2011;34:1557–1565. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JH, Wang WC, Kao TY. Fast copy-move forgery detection. WSEAS Trans. Signal Process. 2009;5:188–197.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch G, Shih YF, Liao H. An efficient expanding block algorithm for image copy-move forgery detection. Inf. Sci. (N.Y.). 2013;239:253–265. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.03.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CJ, Chang PC, Chen KW. Detection of copy–move image forgery using histogram of orientated gradients. Inf. Sci. (N.Y.). 2015;321:250–262. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warbhe DA, Dharaskar VR, Thakare MV. A scaling robust copy-paste tampering detection for digital image forensics. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communication, Computing and Virtualization, 2016, Procedia Computer Science; 2016;79:458–465.
   Google Scholar
• Do NM, Vetterli M. The contourlet transform: an efficient directional multiresolution image representation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2005;14:2091–2106. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2005.859376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klema CV. The singular value decomposition: its computation and some applications. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 1980;25:164–176. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1980.1102314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng TT, Hsu J, Chang FS. Columbia image splicing detection evaluation dataset. Available from: http://www.ee.columbia.edu/ln/dvmm/downloads/AuthSplicedDataSet/AuthSplicedDataSet.htm/
   Google Scholar
• Amerini I, Ballan L, Caldelli R, et al. A SIFT-based forensic method for copy-move attack detection and transformation recovery. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensic. Secur. 2011;6:1099–1110. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2011.2129512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar