Noise classification and automatic restoration system using non-local regularization frameworks

References

• Liu C, Freeman WT, Szeliski R, et al. Noise estimation from a single image. In: 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06); 2006 June 17–22; New York, NY. p. 901–908. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2006.207
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Tanaka M, Okutomi M. Single-image noise level estimation for blind denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2013;22(12):1260–1270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Tanaka M, Okutomi M. Practical signal-dependent noise parameter. Estimation from a single noisy image. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2014;23(10):4361–4371. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2014.2347204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chehdi K, Sabri M. A new approach to identify the nature of the noise affecting an image. In: Proceedings of the IEEE ICASSP 92; 1992 March 23–26; San Francisco, CA. p. 285–288.
   Google Scholar
• Beaurepaire L, Chehdi K, Vozel B. Identification of the nature of noise and estimation of its statistical parameters by analysis of local histograms. In: Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing; 1997 April 21–24; Munich. p. 2805–2808.
   Google Scholar
• Vozel B, Chehdi K, Klaine L, et al. Noise identification and estimation of its statistical parameters by using unsupervised variational classification. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing; 2006 May 14–19; Toulouse. p. 841–844.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Das M. An automated technique for image noise identification using a simple pattern classification approach. In: Proceedings of the 50th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS); 2007 Aug. 5–8; Montreal. p. 819–822.
   Google Scholar
• Jidesh P. A convex regularization model for image restoration. Comput Electr Eng. 2014;40(8):66–78. doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2014.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubert G, Aujol J-F. A variational approach to removing multiplicative noise. SIAM J Appl Math. 2008;68(4):925–946. doi: 10.1137/060671814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa G, Osher S. Nonlocal operators with applications to image processing. Multiscale Model Simul. 2008;7(3):1005–1028. doi: 10.1137/070698592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buades A, Coll B, Morel JM. A non-local algorithm for image denoising. In: 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05); 2005 June 20–25; San Diego, CA. p. 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Lu X, Wang Y, Yuan Y. Graph-regularized low-rank representation for destriping of hyperspectral images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2013;51(7):4009–4018. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2226730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu X, Yuan Y, Yan P. Alternatively constrained dictionary learning for image superresolution. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2014;44(3):366–377. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2013.2256347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le T, Chartrand R, Asaki TJ. A variational approach to reconstructing images corrupted by Poisson noise. J Math Imaging Vision. 2007;27(3):257–263. doi: 10.1007/s10851-007-0652-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Huang L. A new nonlocal total variation regularization algorithm for image denoising. Math Comput Simul. 2014;97:224–233. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jidesh P, Banothu B. Image despeckling with non-local total bounded variation regularization. Comput Electr Eng. 2017:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Zhang Z, Xiao L, et al. Poisson noise removal based on nonlocal total variation with Euler's elastica pre-processing. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Sci). 2017;22(5):609–614. doi: 10.1007/s12204-017-1878-5
   Google Scholar
• López-Rubio E. Restoration of images corrupted by Gaussian and uniform impulsive noise. Pattern Recognit. 2010;43(5):1835–1846. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2009.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, He C. A fast and effective algorithm for a Poisson denoising model with total variation. IEEE Signal Process Lett. 2017;24(3):269–273. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2017.2654480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertero M, Boccacci P, Desiderá G, et al. Image deblurring with Poisson data: from cells to galaxies. Inverse Probl. 2009;25(12):123006. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/25/12/123006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuthill TA, Sperry RH, Parker KJ. Deviation from Rayleigh statistics in ultrasonic speckle. Ultrason Imaging. 1988;10(2):81–89. doi: 10.1177/016173468801000201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shui P-L, Zhang Z-J. Fast SAR image segmentation via merging cost with relative common boundary length penalty. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2014;52(10):6434–6448. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2296561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menéndez ML, Pardo JA, Pardo L, et al. The Jensen-Shannon divergence. J Franklin Inst. 1997;334(2):307–318. doi: 10.1016/S0016-0032(96)00063-4
   Google Scholar
• Kullback S, Leibler RA. On information and sufficiency. Ann Math Stat. 1952;22(1):79–86. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729694
   Google Scholar
• Lin J. Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 1991;37(1):145–151. doi: 10.1109/18.61115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jidesh P, Febin IP. Estimation of noise using non-local regularization frameworks for image denoising and analysis. Arab J Sci Eng. 2018. doi:10.1007/s13369-018-3542-2
   Google Scholar
• Fuglede B, Topsoe F. Jensen-Shannon divergence and Hilbert space embedding. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT); 2004 June 27–July 2; Chicago, IL. p. 31.
   Google Scholar
• Doric D, Nikotic-Doric E, Jevremovic V, et al. On measuring Skewness and Kurtosis. Qual Quant. 2009;43(3):481–493. doi: 10.1007/s11135-007-9128-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzam MM, Awad AM. Entropy measures and some distribution approximations. Microelectron Reliab. 1996;36(10):1569–1580. doi: 10.1016/0026-2714(96)00006-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan K-B, Sathiya Keerthi S. Which is the best multiclass SVM method? An empirical study. In: Oza NC, Polikar R, Kittler J, et al., editors. Multiple classifier systems. Berlin: Springer; 2005 (MCS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; vol. 3541).
   Google Scholar
• Rudin LI, Osher S, Fatemi E. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Phys D. 1992;60(1):259–268. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolova M, Lapalme G. A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks. Inf Process Manage. 2009;45(4):427–437. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar