Probabilistic static foreground elimination for background subtraction

References

• Lee D, Park Y. Vision-based remote control system by motion detection and open finger counting. IEEE Trans Consum Electron. 2009;55(4):2308–2313. doi: 10.1109/TCE.2009.5373803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panwar M, Mehra PS. Hand gesture recognition for human computer interaction. International Conference on Image Information Processing; 2011. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Erden F, Cetin AE. Hand gesture based remote control system using infrared sensors and a camera. IEEE Trans Consum Electron. 2014;60(4):675–680. doi: 10.1109/TCE.2014.7027342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Sim JY, Yang S. Vision-based cleaning area control for cleaning robots. IEEE Trans Consum Electron. 2012;58(2):685–690. doi: 10.1109/TCE.2012.6227477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng B, Wang G, Lin X. A hand gesture based interactive presentation system utilizing heterogeneous cameras. Tsinghua Sci Technol. 2012;17(3):329–336. doi: 10.1109/TST.2012.6216765
   Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Liu Z, Lian X, et al. Study on moving-objects detection technique in video surveillance system. Chinese Control and Decision Conference; 2010. p. 2375–2380.
   Google Scholar
• Premaratne P, Ajaz S, Premaratne M. Hand gesture tracking and recognition system using Lucas-Kanade algorithms for control of consumer electronics. Neurocomputing. 2013;116:242–249. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2011.11.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha H, Ko K. A method for image-based shadow interaction with virtual objects. J Comput Des Eng. 2015;2(1):26–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo PK, Kanungo P, Parvathi K. Three frame based adaptive background subtraction. International Conference on High Performance Computing and Applications (ICHPCA); 2014. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hong H, Zhu X. A new human hand-image tracking method. International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing; 2009. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Juang CF, Chang CM, Wu JR, et al. Computer vision-based human body segmentation and posture estimation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum. 2009;39(1):119–133. doi: 10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2008397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer C, Grimson W. Adaptive background mixture models for real-time tracking. Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, CVPR; 1999. p. 246–252.
   Google Scholar
• Benezeth Y, Jodoin PM, Emile B, et al. Comparative study of background subtraction algorithms. J Electron Imaging. 2010;19(3):033003. doi: 10.1117/1.3456695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgammal A, Harwood D, Davis L. Non-parametric model for background subtraction. European Conference on Computer Vision; 2000. p. 751–767.
   Google Scholar
• Kim K, Chalidabhongse TH, Harwood D, et al. Real-time foreground–background segmentation using codebook model. Real-time Imaging. 2005;11(3):172–185. doi: 10.1016/j.rti.2004.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Haritaoglu I, Harwood D, Davis LS. W4: real-time surveillance of people and their activities. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2000;22(8):809–830. doi: 10.1109/34.868683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanpour H, Sedighi M, Manashty AR. Video frame’s background modeling: Reviewing the techniques. J Signal Inf Process. 2011;02:72–78.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman FYA, Hussain A, Zaki WMDW, et al. Enhancement of background subtraction techniques using a second derivative in gradient direction filter. J Electr Comput Eng. 2013;21.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Dong J, Zhang B, et al. Background modeling methods in video analysis: a review and comparative evaluation. CAAI Trans Intell Technol. 2016;1:43–60. doi: 10.1016/j.trit.2016.03.005
   Google Scholar
• Zivkovic Z. Improved adaptive Gaussian mixture model for background subtraction. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, 2004, ICPR; 2004. p. 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Zivkovic Z, van der Heijden F. Efficient adaptive density estimation per image pixel for the task of background subtraction. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2006;27(7):773–780. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddalena L, Petrosino A. A self-organizing approach to background subtraction for visual surveillance applications. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2008;17(7):1168–1177. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2008.924285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnich O, Van Droogenbroeck M. Vibe: a powerful random technique to estimate the background in video sequences. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP; 2009. p. 945–948.
   Google Scholar
• Barnich O, Van Droogenbroeck M. Vibe: A universal background subtraction algorithm for video sequences. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2011;20(6):1709–1724. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2010.2101613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann M, Tiefenbacher P, Rigoll G. Background segmentation with feedback: the pixel-based adaptive segmenter. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW); 2012. p. 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kushwaha AKS, Sharma CM, Khare M, et al. Adaptive real-time motion segmentation technique based on statistical background model. Imaging Sci J. 2014;62(5):285–302. doi: 10.1179/1743131X13Y.0000000056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong Z, Zhang B, Lu G, et al. An adaptive background modeling method for foreground segmentation. IEEE Trans Intell Transport S. 2017;18(5):1109–1121. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2016.2597441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu Z, Huang XL. The foreground detection algorithm combined the temporal–spatial information and adaptive visual background extraction. Imaging Sci J. 2017;65(1):49–61. doi: 10.1080/13682199.2016.1258509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Yuan Z, Tong Q, et al. A novel framework for background subtraction and foreground detection. Pattern Recognit. 2018;84:28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2018.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava G, Srivastava R. Salient object detection using background subtraction, Gabor filters, objectness and minimum directional backgroundness. J Vis Commun Image Represent. 2019;62:330–339. doi: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2019.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque M, Murshed M, Paul M. On stable dynamic background generation technique using Gaussian mixture models for robust object detection. IEEE 5th International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal based Surveillance; 2008. p. 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng FC, Huang SC, Ruan SJ. Advanced background subtraction approach using Laplacian distribution model. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo; 2010. p. 754–759.
   Google Scholar
• Ng KK, Delp EJ. Background subtraction using a pixel-wise adaptive learning rate for object tracking initialization. Proceedings of SPIE 7882; Visual Information Processing and Communication II; 2011. p. 78820I.
   Google Scholar
• Xu G, Zhao D, Zhou Q, et al. Moving target tracking based on adaptive background subtraction and improved camshift algorithm. International Conference on Audio, Language and Image Processing; 2012. p. 919–924.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Gong W, Grzeda V, et al. An adaptive learning rate method for improving adaptability of background models. IEEE Signal Process Lett. 2013;20(12):1266–1269. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2013.2288579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman MA, Ahmed B, Hossian MA, et al. An adaptive background modeling based on modified running Gaussian average method. International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE); 2017. p. 524–527.
   Google Scholar
• Su ST, Chen YY. Moving object segmentation using improved running Gaussian average background model. Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications; 2008. p. 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Wang SK, Qin B, Fang ZH, et al. Fast shadow detection according to the moving region. International Conference Machine Learning and Cybernetics; 2007. p. 1590–1595.
   Google Scholar
• Ng KK, Delp EJ. Object tracking initialization using automatic moving object detection. Proceedings of SPIE 7543, Visual Information Processing and Communication; 2010. p. 75430M.
   Google Scholar
• Toyama K, Krumm J, Brumitt B, et al. Wallflower: principles and practice of background maintenance. Proceedings of 7th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision; 1999. p. 255–261.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwmans T. Subspace learning for background modeling: a survey. Recent Pat Comput Sci. 2009;2(3):223–234. doi: 10.2174/2213275910902030223
   Google Scholar
• Wren CR, Azarbayejani A, Darrell T, et al. Pfinder: real-time tracking of the human body. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1997;19:780–785. doi: 10.1109/34.598236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver NM, Rosario B, Pentland AP. A Bayesian computer vision system for modelling human interactions. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2000;22:831–843. doi: 10.1109/34.868684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai DM, Lai SC. Independent component analysis-based background subtraction for indoor surveillance. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2009;18:158–167. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2008.2007558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucak SS, Gunsel B, Gursoy O. Incremental non-negative matrix factorization for dynamic background Modelling. PRIS2007; 2007. p. 107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Hu W, Zhang Z, et al. Robust foreground segmentation based on two effective background models. Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval; ACM2008; 2008. p. 223–228.
   Google Scholar
• Isik S, Ozkan K, Dogan M, et al. A note on background subtraction by utilizing a new tensor approach. Int J Intell Syst Appl Eng. 2016;4:87–91. doi: 10.18201/ijisae.267154
   Google Scholar