A total variation and group sparsity-based algorithm for nuclear radiation-contaminated video restoration

References

• Kryshev II, Ryazantsev EP. Risk assessment for radioactive contamination of the environment during operation of a nuclear power plant. At Energy. 1998;85(2):583–588. doi:10.1007/BF02359938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugimoto A, Gilmour S, Tsubokura M, et al. Assessment of the risk of medium-term internal contamination in Minamisoma City, Fukushima, Japan, after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(6):587–593. doi:10.1289/ehp.1306848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller A, Machrafi R, Mohany A. Development of a semi-autonomous directional and spectroscopic radiation detection mobile platform. Radiat Meas. 2014;72:53–59. doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsitsimpelis I, Taylor C J, Lennox B, et al. A review of ground-based robotic systems for the characterization of nuclear environments. Prog Nucl Energy. 2019;111:109–124. doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.10.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen L, Li YD, Guo Q, et al. Analysis of ionizing and department damage mechanism in proton-irradiation-induced scientific charge-coupled device. Acta Phys Sin. 2015;64(2):257–263. doi:10.7498/aps.64.024220.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Huang S, Liu M, et al. Displacement damage effects on CMOS APS image sensors induced by neutron irradiation from a nuclear reactor. AIP Adv. 2014;4(7):077108. doi:10.1063/1.4889878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong D, Chan T. Edge-preserving and scale-dependent properties of total variation regularization. Inverse Probl. 2003;19(6):S165–S187. doi:10.1088/0266-5611/19/6/059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan TF, Shen J. Variational image inpainting. Commun Pure Appl Math. 2010;58(5):579–619. doi:10.1002/cpa.20075.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Burger M, Bresson X, et al. Bregmanized nonlocal regularization for deconvolution and sparse reconstruction. SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2010;3(3):253–276. doi:10.1137/090746379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu L, Jin W, Wang X. Non-local means image denoising with a soft threshold. IEEE Signal Process Lett. 2015;22(7):833–837. doi:10.1109/LSP.2014.2371332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairal J, Bach F, Ponce J, et al. Non-local sparse models for image restoration. IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2009, Kyoto, Japan, September 27-October 4, 2009. IEEE, 2009. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459452.
   Google Scholar
• Dong W, Shi G, Li X. Nonlocal image restoration with bilateral variance estimation: a low-rank approach. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2013;22(2):700–711. doi:10.1109/TIP.2012.2221729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Z, Ling Q, Li H, et al. Video restoration based on a novel second order nonlocal total variation model. Signal Processing. 2017,133(4): 79-96. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielyan A, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K. BM3D frames and variational image deblurring. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2012;21(4):1715–1728. doi:10.1109/TIP.2011.2176954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasner D, Bagon S, Irani M. Super-resolution from a single image. 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE Computer Society, 2009, September, pp. 349–356. doi: 10.1109/iccv.2009.5459271.
   Google Scholar
• Luo E, Chan S H, Nguyen T Q. Adaptive image denoising by targeted databases. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2015;24(7):2167–2181. doi:10.1109/TIP.2015.2414873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue H, Sun X, Yang J, et al. Image denoising by exploring external and internal correlations. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2015;24(6):1967–1982. doi:10.1109/TIP.2015.2412373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaerts J, Dierickx B, Mertens R. Random telegraph signals in a radiation-hardened CMOS active pixel sensor. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2002;49(1):249–257. doi:10.1109/TNS.2002.998649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congzheng W, Song H, Chunming G, et al. Nuclear radiation degradation study on HD camera based on CMOS image sensor at different dose rates. Sensors. 2018;18(2):514–523. doi:10.3390/s18020514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Zhao LH, Deng Q. A novel anti-nuclear radiation image restoration algorithm based on inpainting technology. J Univ South China (Sci Technol). 2016;30(4):56–61. doi:10.19431/j.cnki.1673-0062.2016.04.011.
   Google Scholar
• Hindasyah A, Sudiana D, Gunawan D. A novel technique for removal of high density white spot noise from digital neutron radiographic images. Atom Indones. 2018;44(3):165–171. doi:10.17146/aij.2018.846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger M, He L, Nlieb C B. Cahn-Hilliard inpainting and a generalization for gray value images. SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2009;2(4):1129–1167. doi:10.1137/080728548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan M. Restoration of images corrupted by impulse noise and mixed Gaussian impulse noise using blind inpainting. SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2013;6(3):1227–1245. doi:10.1137/12087178X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa G. A spectral approach to total variation. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2013;7893:36–47. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38267-3.
   Google Scholar
• Horesh D, Gilboa G. Separation surfaces in the spectral TV domain for texture decomposition. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2015;25(9):4260–4270. doi:10.1109/TIP.2016.2587121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai L, Sun X, Wu F, et al. Large scale image retrieval with visual groups. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. IEEE, 2014. 2582-2586. doi: 10.1109/ICIP.2013.6738532.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel C R, Fast OME. Robust total variation-based reconstruction of noisy, blurred images. IEEE Trans Image Process. 1998;7(6):813–824. doi:10.1109/83.679423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck A, Teboulle M. Fast gradient-based algorithms for constrained total variation image denoising and deblurring problems. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2009;18(11):2419–2434. doi:10.1109/TIP.2009.2028250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger M, Gilboa G, Moeller M, et al. Spectral decompositions using one-homogeneous functionals. SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2016;9(3):1374–1408. doi:10.1137/15M1054687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hait E, Gilboa G. Spectral total-variation local scale signatures for image manipulation and fusion. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2019;28(2):880–895. doi:10.1109/TIP.2018.2872630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao L, Chen S, Tan X. Sparsity preserving projections with applications to face recognition. Pattern Recognit. 2010;43(1):331–341. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2009.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran V, Sanghavi S, Parrilo P A, et al. Rank-sparsity incoherence for matrix decomposition. SIAM J Optim. 2011;21(2):572–596. doi:10.1137/090761793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairal J, Bach F, Ponce J, et al. Non-local sparse models for image restoration. IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2009, Kyoto, Japan, September 27 - October 4, 2009. IEEE, 2009. doi:10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459452.
   Google Scholar
• Han Y, Wu F, Tian Q, et al. Image annotation by input–output structural grouping sparsity. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2012;21(6):3066–3079. doi:10.1109/TIP.2012.2183880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du D, Zhang L, Lu H, et al. Discriminative hash tracking with group sparsity. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2015;46(8):1914–1925. doi:10.1109/TCYB.2015.2457618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao S. Image inpainting method based on total variation regularization. Recent Advances in Electrical & Electronic Engineering. 2017;10(3):242–247. doi:10.2174/2352096510666170601090909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz J, Bogdanova I, Paquier B, et al. Scale invariant feature transform on the sphere: theory and applications. Int J Comput Vis. 2012;98(2):217–241. doi:10.1007/s11263-011-0505-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philbin J, Chum O, Isard M, et al. Object retrieval with large vocabularies and fast spatial matching. 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society, 2007. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383172.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Ke Q, Isard M, et al. Bundling features for large scale partial-duplicate web image search. 2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2009), 20-25 June 2009, Miami, Florida, USA. IEEE, 2009. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206566.
   Google Scholar
• Saini I, Singh D, Khosla A. QRS detection using k-nearest neighbor algorithm (KNN) and evaluation on standard ECG databases. J Adv Res. 2013;4(4):331–344. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2012.05.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghael E P, Sayeed AM, Baraniuk RG. Improved wavelet denoising via empirical Wiener filtering. Proc SPIE – Int Soc Opt Eng. 1998;3169:389–399. doi:10.1117/12.292799.
   Google Scholar
• Dong W, Zhang L, Shi G, et al. Nonlocally centralized sparse representation for image restoration. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2013;22(4):1620–1630. doi:10.1109/TIP.2012.2235847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui AT, Im JK, Apley DW, et al. Projection-free kernel principal component analysis for denoising. Neurocomputing. 2019;357:163–176. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.04.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar