Development of the Grammar and Phonology Screening (GAPS) test to assess key markers of specific language and literacy difficulties in young children

References

• Bishop D. V. M. Uncommon Understanding: Comprehension in Specific Language Impairment. Psychology Press, Hove 1997
   Google Scholar
• Bishop D. V., Adams C. V., Norbury C. F. Using nonword repetition to distinguish genetic and environmental influences on early literacy development: a study of 6‐year‐old twins. American Journal of Medical Genetics 2004; 129B: 94–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop D. V. M., Adams C. V., Norbury C. F. Distinct genetic influences on grammar and phonological short‐term memory deficits: evidence from 6‐year‐old twins. Genes, Brain and Behavior 2005, (in press)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop D., Bright P., James C., Bishop S., Van der Lely H. Grammatical SLI: a distinct subtype of developmental language disorder?. Applied Psycholinguistics 2000; 21: 159–181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop D. V. M., North T., Donlan C. Nonword repetition as a behavioural marker for inherited language impairment: evidence from a twin study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 1996; 37: 391–403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown R. Linguistic determinism and the part of speech. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1957; 55: 1–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiat S. Mapping theories of developmental language impairment: premises predictions and evidence. Language and Cognitive Processes 2001; 16: 113–142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky N. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. Praeger, New York, NY 1986
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N. The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge MA 1995
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N., Halle M. The sound pattern of English. MIT Press, New York 1968
   Google Scholar
• Clahsen H., Almazan M. Syntax and morphology in Williams Syndrome. Cognition 1998; 68: 167–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen H., Bartke S., Goellner S. Formal features in impaired grammars: a comparison of English and German SLI children. Journal of Neurolinguistics 1997; 10: 151–171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti‐Ramsden G. Processing and linguistic markers in young children with specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Speech–Language Hearing Research 2003; 46: 1029–1037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti‐Ramsden G., Hesketh A. Risk markers for SLI: a study of young language‐learning children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2003; 38: 251–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti‐Ramsden G., Botting N., Faragher B. Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2001; 42: 741–748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti‐Ramsden G., Crutchley A., Botting N. The extent to which psychometric tests differentiate subgroups of children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1997; 40: 765–777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain S., Thornton R. Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Dale P. S., Price T. S., Bishop D. V., Plomin R. Outcomes of early language delay: I. Predicting persistent and transient language difficulties at 3 and 4 years. Journal of Speech–Language Hearing Research 2003; 46: 544–560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills. The National Literacy Strategy 2001, Available online at http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/literacy/publications/research/63541/
   Google Scholar
• Dockrell J., Messer D., George R. Patterns of naming objects and actions in children with word finding difficulties. Language and Cognitive Processes 2001; 16: 261–286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn L., Dunn L., Whetton C., Burley J. The British Picture Vocabulary Scale, 2nd edn. 1997, Unpublished manuscript (Windsor)
   Google Scholar
• Ebbels S. Argument structure in specific language impairment: from theory to therapy. 2005, Unpublished PhD, University College London
   Google Scholar
• Ebbels S., van der Lely H. K. J. Meta‐syntactic therapy for children with severe persistent SLI using visual coding. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2001; 36: 345–350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards S., Fletcher P., Garman M., Hughes A., Letts C., Sinka I. The Reynell Developmental Language Scales III. NFER‐Nelson, Windsor 1997
   Google Scholar
• Fey M. E., Cleave P. L., Long S. H. Two models of grammar facilitation in children with language impairments: phase. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 1997; 2: 5–19
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann N., Novogrodsky R. The acquisition of Relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: a study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language 2004; 31: 661–681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallon N., Harris J., van der Lely, H. K. J. An investigation into phonological complexity using non‐word repitition tasks in children with G‐SLI (submitted). 2005
   Google Scholar
• Gathercole S., Adams A. Phonological working memory in very young children. Developmental Psychology 1993; 29: 770–778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole S., Baddeley A. Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: is there a causal connection?. Journal of Memory and Language 1990; 29: 336–360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole S., Baddeley A. The Children's Test of Non‐Word Repetition. Psychological Corporation, London 1996
   Google Scholar
• Hamann C., Penner Z., Lindner K. German impaired grammar: the clause structure revisited. Language Acquisition 1998; 7: 193–245
   Google Scholar
• Harris J. English Sound Structure. Blackwell, Oxford 1994
   Google Scholar
• Hauser M. D., Chomsky N., Fitch W. T. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?. Science 2002; 298: 1569–1579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes C., Naidoo S. Children with Specific Speech and Language Impairment. MacKeith, Oxford 1991
   Google Scholar
• Heath S., Hogben J. H. Cost‐effective prediction of reading difficulties. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 2004; 47: 751–765
   Google Scholar
• Joanisse M. F., Seidenberg M. S. Phonology and syntax in specific language impairment: evidence from a connectionist model. Brain and Language 2003; 86: 40–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing G., Law J., Levin A., Logan S. Evaluation of a structured test and a parent led method for screening for speech and language problems: prospective population based study. British Medical Journal 2002; 325: 1152–1155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law J., Garrett Z., Nye N. Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and language delay or disorder. Cochrane review 2003, no. 1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laws G., Bishop D. V. A comparison of language abilities in adolescents with Down's syndrome and children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech–Language Hearing Research 2003; 46: 1324–1339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard L. Children with Specific Language Impairment. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Lust B., Flynn S., Foley C. What children know about what they say: elicited imitation as a research method for assessing children's syntax. Methods for Assessing Children's Syntax, D McDaniel, C McKlee, H Smith Cairns. MIT Press, Cambridge, M 1996; 55–76
   Google Scholar
• Marshall C. R., Ebbels S., Harris J., van der Lely, H. K. J. Investigating the impact of prosodic complexity on the speech of children with Specific Language Impairment. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2002, In: Vermeulen R, Neeleman A, eds. Vol. 14, pp. 43–68
   Google Scholar
• Marshall C., Harris J., van der Lely, H. K. The nature of phonological representations in children with Grammatical‐Specific Language Impairment (G‐SLI). The University of Cambridge First Postgraduate Conference in Language Research, D Hall, T Markopoulos, A Salamoura, S Skoufaki. Cambridge Institute of Language Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge 2003; 511–517
   Google Scholar
• Marshall C., van der Lely, H. A challenge to current models of past tense inflection: the impact of phonotactics. Cognition, in press
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel D., McKee C., Smith Cairns H. Methods for Assessing Children's Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1996
   Google Scholar
• Morgan J. L., Demuth K. Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 1996
   Google Scholar
• Nation K., Clarke P., Marshall C. M., Durand M. Hidden language impairments in children: parallels between poor reading comprehension and specific languagement impairment?. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2004; 47: 199–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Literacy. Put Reading First: The Research Building Blocks for Teaching Children to Read 2001, NIFL, National Institute of child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and US Department of Education (available at http://www.nifl.gov/partnershipforreading/publications/reading_first1.html)
   Google Scholar
• Näätänen R., Lehtokoski A., Lennes M., Cheour M., Huotilainen M., Iivonen A., Vainio M., Alku P., Ilmoniemi R. J., Luuk A., Allik J., Sinkkonen J., Alho K. Language‐specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature 1997; 385: 432–434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson K. E., Camarata S. M., Welsh J., Butkovsky L., Camarata M. Effects of imitative and conversational recasting treatment on the acquisition of grammar in children with specific language impairment and younger language‐normal children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1996; 39: 850–859
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newman S. Working on both sides of the fence: the effect of dual qualification on collaborative working practice. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 1996; 2: 39–47
   Google Scholar
• Norbury C., Bishop D. Inferential processing and story recall in children with communication problems: a comparison of specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment and high‐functioning autism. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2002; 37: 227–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norbury C., Bishop D., Briscoe J. Production of English finite verb morphology: a comparison of SLI and mild‐to‐moderate hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2001; 44: 165–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norbury C., Bishop D., Briscoe J. Does impaired grammatical comprehension provide evidence for an innate grammar module?. Applied Psycholinguistics 2002; 23: 247–268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hara M., Johnston J. Syntactic bootstrapping in children with specific language impairment. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 1997; 2: 189–205
   Google Scholar
• Office of National Statistics. 2000a. Standard Occupational Classification. Vol. 1: Structure and Descriptions of Unit Groups (available at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/methods_quality/ns_sec/downloads/SOC2000_Vol1_V5.pdf )
   Google Scholar
• Office of National Statistics. 2000b. Standard Occupational Classification. Vol. 2: The Coding Index (available at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/methods_quality/ns_sec/downloads/SOC2000_Vol2_V6.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Office of National Statistics. 2005. National Statistics. (available at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001/)
   Google Scholar
• Pickstone C., Hannon P., Fox L. Surveying and screening preschool language development in community focussed intervention programmes: a review of instruments. Child Care, Health and Development 2002; 28: 251–264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker S. The Language Instinct. W. Morrow, New York, NY 1994
   Google Scholar
• Pinker S. Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London 1999
   Google Scholar
• Precious A., Conti‐Ramsden G. Language‐impaired children's comprehension of active versus passive sentences. British Journal of Disorders in Communication 1988; 23: 229–243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quality Curriculum Authority. 2003, The speaking and listening curriculum (available at http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/literacy/publications/framework/818497/)
   Google Scholar
• Ramus F. Outstanding questions about phonological processing in dyslexia. Dyslexia 2001; 7: 197–216
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramus F. Developmental dyslexia: specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction?. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2003; 13: 212–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice M. Language growth of children with SLI and unaffected children: timing mechanisms and linguistic distinctions. Proceeding of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 2004; vol. 1: 28–49, In: Brugos A, Micciulla L, Smith C, eds. Somerville, MA. Cascadilla
   Google Scholar
• Rice M., Wexler K. Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English‐speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1996; 39: 1239–1257
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ring M., Clahsen H. Distinct patterns of language impairment in Down Syndrome, Williams Syndrome, and SLI: the case of syntactic chains. 2003, Unpublished manuscript, University of Essex, Colchester
   Google Scholar
• Roy P., Chiat S. A prosodically controlled word and nonword repetition task for 2‐ to 4‐year‐olds: evidence from typically developing children. Journal of Speech–Language Hearing Research 2004; 47: 223–234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg L. D., Tomblin J. B., McSweeny J. L. Prevalence of speech delay in 6‐year‐old children and comorbidity with language impairment. Journal of Speech–Language Hearing Research 1999; 42: 1461–1481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowling M. Dyslexia 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford 2000
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakaki S. Comprehension of reversible relative clauses in specifically language impaired and normally developing Greek children. Brain and Language 2001; 77: 419–431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrakaki S. A‐bar movement constructions in Greek children with SLI: evidence for deficits in the syntactic component of language. Clinical Linguistics: Theory and Applications in Speech Pathology and Therapy. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, E Fava. John Benjamins, Amsterdam 2002; 131–153
   Google Scholar
• Tallal P., Piercy M. Developmental aphasia: impaired rate of non‐verbal processing as a function of sensory modality. Neuropsychologia 1973; 11: 389–398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton R. Referentiality and Wh‐movement in child English: Juvenile D‐Linkuency. Language Acquisition 1995; 4: 139–175
   Google Scholar
• Tomblin J. B., Records N. L., Buckwalter P., Zhang X., Smith E., O'Brien M. Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. Journal of Speech–Language Hearing Research 1997; 40: 1245–1260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J. Specifically language impaired and normally developing children: verbal passive versus adjectival passive sentence interpretation. Lingua 1996a; 98: 243–272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J. The Test of Active and Passive Sentences (TAPS). 1996b, (available from author: Centre for Developmental Language Disorders and Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London)
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J. Advanced‐Syntactic test of Pronominal reference (A‐STOP). 1997, (available from author: Centre for Developmental Language Disorders and Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK)
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J. SLI in children: movement, economy and deficits in the computational syntactic system. Language Acquisition 1998; 72: 161–192
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J. Verb Agreement and Tense Test (VATT )London. 1999, (available from author: Centre for Developmental Language Disorders and Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK)
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J. Evidence for and implications of a domain‐specific grammatical deficit. The Genetics of Language, L Jenkins. Elsevier, Oxford 2004; 117–144
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J. Domain‐specific cognitive systems: insight from grammatical‐specific language impairment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005; 9: 53–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J., Battell J. Wh‐movement in children with grammatical SLI: a test of the RDDR hypothesis. Language 2003; 79: 153–181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J., Harris J. The Test of Phonological Structure (TOPhS). available from author: Centre for Developmental Language Disorders & Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London 1999
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J., Rosen S., Adlard A. Grammatical language impairment and the specificity of cognitive domains: relations between auditory and language abilities. Cognition 2004; 94: 167–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J., Rosen S., McClelland A. Evidence for a grammar‐specific deficit in children. Current Biology 1998; 8: 1253–1258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J., Stollwerk L. Binding theory and grammatical specific language impairment in children. Cognition 1997; 62: 245–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiig E. H., Secord W., Semel E. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals — Preschool. Psychological Corporation, London 2000
   Google Scholar