Cognitive approach to assessing pragmatic language comprehension in children with specific language impairment

References

• Adams C., Lloyd J. Elicited and spontaneous communicative functions and stability of conversational measures with children who have pragmatic language impairments. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2005; 40: 333–347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bara B. G., Bosco F. M., Bucciarelli M. Developmental pragmatics in normal and abnormal children. Brain and Language 1999; 68: 507–528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop D. V. M. Test for Reception of Grammar 2. Psychological Corporation, London 2003a
   Google Scholar
• Bishop D. V. M. The Children's Communication Checklist Version 2. Psychological Corporation, London 2003b
   Google Scholar
• Botting N., Adams C. Semantic and inferencing abilities in children with communication disorders. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2005; 40: 49–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli M., Colle L., Bara B. G. How children comprehend speech acts and communicative gestures. Journal of Pragmatics 2003; 35: 207–241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carston R. Informativeness, relevance and scalar Implicature. Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications, R Carston, S Uchida. John Benjamins, Amsterdam 1998; 179–236
   Google Scholar
• Cooper G. Cognitive load theory as an aid for instructional design. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 1990; 6: 108–113
   Google Scholar
• Edwards J., Lahey M. Auditory lexical decisions of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1996; 39: 1263–1273
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foster‐Cohen S. Exploring the boundary between syntax and pragmatics: relevance and the binding of pronouns. Journal of Child Language 1994; 21: 237–255
   Google Scholar
• Gathercole S., Baddeley A. Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: is there a causal connection?. Journal of Memory and Language 1990; 29: 336–360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk S. A., McCarthy J. J., Kirk W. D. Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. University of Illinois, Urbana Illinois 1968
   Google Scholar
• Leinonen E., Ryder N., Ellis M., Hammond C. The use of context in pragmatic comprehension by specifically language impaired and control children. Linguistics 2002; 41: 407–423
   Google Scholar
• Loukusa S., Ryder N., Leinonen E. 2005, Comprehension of contextual meaning in Finnish speaking children. Poster presented at the CRASSH Conference, ‘Experimental Pragmatics Exploring the Basis of Conversation’, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
   Google Scholar
• Mainela‐Arnold E., Evans J. Beyond capacity limitations: determinants of word recall performance on verbal working memory span tasks in children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2005; 48: 897–909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTear M., Conti‐Ramsden G. Pragmatic Disability in Children. Whurr, London 1992
   Google Scholar
• Milosky L. M. Children listening: the role of world knowledge in comprehension. Processes in Language Acquisition and Disorders, R Chapman. Mosby, St Louis, MO 1992
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery J. Relation of working memory to off‐line and real‐time sentence processing in children with specific language impairment. Applied Linguistics 2000; 21: 117–148
   Google Scholar
• Norbury C. F., Bishop D. V. M. Inferential processing and story recall in children with communication problems: a comparison of specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment and high‐functioning autism. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2002; 37: 227–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noveck I. A., Chierchia G., Chevaux F., Guelminger R., Sylvestre E. Linguistic‐pragmatic factors in interpreting disjunctions. Thinking and Reasoning 2002; 8: 297–326
   Google Scholar
• Ottem E., Jakobsen U. Using the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Ability with bilingual and monolingual language‐impaired children. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 2004; 48: 159–167
   Google Scholar
• Renfrew C. E. The Renfrew Action Picture Test. Winslow, Bicester 1988
   Google Scholar
• Ryder N., Leinonen E. The use of context in question answering by three, four and five year old children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2003; 32: 397–414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith B. R., Leinonen E. Clinical Pragmatics. Chapman‐Hall, London 1992
   Google Scholar
• Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford 1995, 2nd edn
   Google Scholar
• Vance M., Wells B. The wrong end of the stick: language‐impaired children's understanding of non‐literal language. Child Language, Teaching and Therapy 1994; 10: 23–46
   Google Scholar
• Wiig E., Secord W. Test of Word Knowledge. Psychological Corporation, London 1992
   Google Scholar
• Wilson D. Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. Metarepresentations, D Sperber. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2000; 411–448
   Google Scholar