484
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Current Issues in Method and Practice

Critical factors for implementing a programme for international MICE professionals: a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP

, , &
Pages 1527-1550 | Received 06 Feb 2015, Accepted 18 May 2015, Published online: 22 Jun 2015

References

  • Abdel Ghany, S. Y., & Abdel Latif, M. M. (2012). English language preparation of tourism and hospitality undergraduates in Egypt: Does it meet their future workplace requirements? Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 11(2), 93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlste.2012.05.001
  • Adams, W. J. L., & Saaty, D. L. (2013). U.S. Patent No. 8,423,500. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  • Anthony, L. W. L. (2008). Teacher concerns about curriculum reform: The case of project learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17, 75–97.
  • Baker, J., Lovell, K., & Harris, N. (2006). How expert are the experts? An exploration of the concept of expert within Delphi panel techniques. Nurse Researcher, 14(1), 59–70. doi: 10.7748/nr2006.10.14.1.59.c6010
  • Castillo, E., Hadi, A. S., Conejo, A., & Fernández-Canteli, A. (2004). A general method for local sensitivity analysis with application to regression models and other optimization problems. Technometrics, 46(4), 430–444. doi: 10.1198/004017004000000509
  • Chang, M. (2011). Factors affecting the implementation of communicative language teaching in Taiwanese college English classes. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 3–12.
  • Chen, C. A. (2012). Discussion on increasing college teachers’ willingness to adopt web-based learning in teaching. Business and Management Research, 1(3), 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.007
  • Chen, C. H., & Tzeng, G. H. (2011). Creating the aspired intelligent assessment systems for teaching materials. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12168–12179. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.050
  • Chen, J. K., & Chen, I. S. (2010). Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(3), 1981–1990. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.079
  • Cheng, C. -C., Tsai, M. -C., & Lin, C. -L. (2013). Quality education service: Put your feet in their shoes. Current Issues in Tourism, 1–16. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2013.839633
  • Cheung, D., Ng, D., & Hattie, J. (2000). The simplex structure of teachers’ stages of concern about implementing a new curriculum. Canadian and International Education, 29(1), 87–103.
  • Christou, C., Eliophotou-Menon, M., & Philippou, G. (2004). Teachers’ concern regarding the adoption of a new mathematics curriculum: An application of CBAM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(2), 157–176. doi: 10.1023/B:EDUC.0000049271.01649.dd
  • De Lano, L., Riley, L., & Crookes, G. (1994). The meaning of innovation for ESL teachers. System, 22(4), 487–496. doi: 10.1016/0346-251X(94)90005-1
  • De Segovia, L. P., & Hardison, D. M. (2009). Implementing education reform: EFL teachers’ perspectives. ELT Journal, 63(2), 154–162. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccn024
  • Dou, Y., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2014). Integrating strategic carbon management into formal evaluation of environmental supplier development programs. Business Strategy and the Environment. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1002/bse.1851
  • DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Karhanek, G. (2004). Whatever it takes: How professional learning communities respond when kids don't learn. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
  • Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
  • Durlak, J. A., Mahoney, J. L., Bohnert, A. M., & Parente, M. E. (2010). Developing and improving after school programs to enhance youth's personal growth and adjustment: A special issue of AJCP. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 285–293. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9298-9
  • Ferrara, D. (2000). Planning for implementing, and supporting shared decision making. Educational Planning, 12(3), 3–20.
  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231). Retrieved December 11, 2012, from http://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/sites/nirn.fpg.unc.edu/files/resources/NIRN-MonographFull-01-2005.pdf
  • Fu, P. P., Peng, T. K. Kennedy, J., & Yukl, G. (2004). Examining the preferences of influence tactics in Chinese societies: A comparison of Chinese managers in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China. Organizational Dynamics, 33(1), 32–46. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2003.11.003
  • Fullan, M. (1991). Curriculum implementation. In A. Lewy (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of curriculum (pp. 378–384). New York: Pergamon Press.
  • Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47, 335–397. doi: 10.3102/00346543047002335
  • Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. (1973). Perceptions of the world problematique: Communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective Responsibility (DEMATEL). Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Center.
  • Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
  • Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
  • Harker, P. T. (1987). Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modelling, 9(11), 837–848. doi: 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90503-3
  • Henrichsen, L. (1989). The diffusion of innovations in English language teaching: The ELEC efforts in Japan, 1956–1968. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
  • Huang, C. N., Liou, J. J., & Chuang, Y. C. (2014). A method for exploring the interdependencies and importance of critical infrastructures. Knowledge-Based Systems, 55, 66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.10.010
  • Kuan, M., & Chen, Y. (2014). A hybrid MCDM framework combined with DEMATEL-based ANP to evaluate enterprise technological innovation capabilities assessment. Decision Science Letters, 3(4), 491–502. doi: 10.5267/j.dsl.2014.6.003
  • Lamie, J. M. (2004). Presenting a model of change. Language Teaching Research, 8(2), 115–142. doi: 10.1191/1362168804lr137oa
  • Lee, H. S., Tzeng, G. H., Yeih, W., Wang, Y. J., & Yang, S. C. (2013). Revised DEMATEL: Resolving the infeasibility of DEMATEL. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(10), 6746–6757. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.016
  • Leong, J. L. T. (2006). Perceived effectiveness of influence strategies in the United States and three Chinese societies. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6(1), 101–120. doi: 10.1177/1470595806064985
  • Li, C. W., & Tzeng, G. H. (2009). Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor Intellectual Property Mall. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), 9891–9898. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.073
  • Lyster, R., & Ballinger, S. (2011). Content-based language teaching: Convergent concerns across divergent contexts. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 279–288. doi: 10.1177/1362168811401149
  • Maggi, R., & Padurean, L. (2009). Higher tourism education in English – Where and why? Tourism Review, 64(1), 48–58. doi: 10.1108/16605370910948858
  • Markee, N. (1992). The diffusion of innovation in language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 229–243. doi: 10.1017/S0267190500002488
  • Novakowski, N., & Wellar, B. (2008). Using the Delphi technique in normative planning research: Methodological design considerations. Environmental and Planning, A, 40, 1485–1500.
  • Payton, J., Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., Schellinger, K. B., & Pachan, M. (2008). The positive impact of social and emotional learning for kindergarten to eighth-grade students: Findings from three scientific reviews. Chicago: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
  • Peranginangin, E., Shieh, M. D., & Chen, K. (2013). Design strategies for mobile language learning effectiveness using hybrid MCDM approach. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(25), 24–34.
  • Phillips, R. (2000). New applications for the Delphi technique. Annual-San Diego-Pfeiffer and Company, 2, 191–196.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Ruhanen, L., Breakey, N., & Robinson, R. (2012). Knowledge exchange and networks: A new destination for tourism internships? Current Issues in Tourism, 15(3), 183–196. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2011.577890
  • Ruzek, J. I., & Rosen, R. C. (2009). Disseminating evidence-based treatments for PTSD in organizational settings: A high priority focus area. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(11), 980–989. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.008
  • Seyed-Hosseini, S. M., Safaei, N., & Asgharpour, M. J. (2006). Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(8), 872–881. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.09.005
  • Shen, J. L. & Liu, Y. M. (2011). Integrated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method combined with decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and analytic network process (ANP) in food supplier selection. African Journal of Business Management, 6(12), 4595–4602.
  • Shoulders, C. W. & Myers, B. E. (2011). An analysis of National Agriscience teacher ambassadors’ stages of concern regarding inquiry-based instruction. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(2), 58–70. doi: 10.5032/jae.2011.02058
  • Taiwan External Trade Development Council. (2013). Annual report 32: Marketing Taiwan's MICE industry. Retrieved July 12, 2014, from http://www.taitra.org.tw/download/report2013_e_p32-34.pdf
  • Tang, H. W. (2014). Constructing a competence model for international professionals in the MICE industry: An analytic hierarchy process approach. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 15, 34–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlste.2014.04.001
  • Tornatzky, L. G. & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions of Engineering and Management, EM-29, 28–45. doi: 10.1109/TEM.1982.6447463
  • Tsai, W. H., & Chou, W. C. (2009). Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1444–1458. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.058
  • Tsai, W. H., & Hsu, W. (2010). A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL and ANP for selecting cost of quality model development. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(4), 439–456. doi: 10.1080/14783361003606852
  • Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., & Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x
  • Wang, W. F. (2014). Teachers’ stages of concern and levels of use of a curriculum innovation in China: A case study. International Journal of Language Teaching, 1(1), 11–21.
  • Warford, M. K. (2005). Testing a diffusion of innovations in education model (DIEM). The Innovation Journal, 10(3), 4–5.
  • Waters, A. (2009). Managing innovation in English language education. Language Teaching, 42(4), 421–458. doi: 10.1017/S026144480999005X
  • White, R. V. (1993). Innovation in curriculum planning and program development. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 244–25. doi: 10.1017/S026719050000249X
  • Williams, P. L., & Webb, C. (1994). The Delphi technique: A methodological discussion. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(1), 180–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01066.x
  • Wu, H. Y., Lin, Y. K., & Chang, C. H. (2011). Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), 37–50. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.06.001
  • Wu, W. W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828–835. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.07.025
  • Yamada, N., Kim, S. K., & Heo, J. (2013). Predicting the intentions of tourism major students in a Korean University to acquire foreign language skills. Current Issues in Tourism, 16(5), 507–511. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2012.709833
  • Yang, S. C., & Huang, Y. F. (2008). A study of high school English teachers’ behavior, concerns and beliefs in integrating information technology into English instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1085–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.009
  • Yang, Y. P. Q., Shieh, H. M., Leu, J. D., & Tzeng, G. H. (2008). A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International Journal of Operations Research, 5(3), 1–9.
  • Ye, J. (2007). Adapting communicative language teaching approach to China's context. Sino-US English Teaching, 4(10), 29–33.
  • Yu, L. (2001). Communicative language teaching in China: Progress and resistance. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 194–179. doi: 10.2307/3587868
  • Yu, R., & Tzeng, G. H. (2006). A soft computing method for multi-criteria decision making with dependence and feedback. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 180(1), 63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.163

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.