Ado/apting established methods: a critique of McWha, Frost, & Laing (2018)

References

• Baker, C., Wuest, J., & Stern, P. (1992). Method slurring: The grounded theory/phenomenology example. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17(11), 1355–1360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01859.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggerstaff, D., & Thompson, A. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A qualitative methodology of choice in healthcare research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(3), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880802314304
   Google Scholar
• Brocki, J., & Wearden, A. (2006). A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 21(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320500230185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callary, B., Rathwell, S., & Young, B. (2015). Insights on the process of using interpretive phenomenological analysis in a sport coaching research project. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, S., & Little, M. (2007). Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1316–1328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307306927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cutcliffe, J. (2005). Adapt or adopt: Developing and transgressing the methodological boundaries of grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51(4), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03514.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutcliffe, J., & Harder, H. (2012). Methodological precision in qualitative research: Slavish adherence or “following the yellow brick road?” The Qualitative Report, 17(41), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1720
   Google Scholar
• Dimache, A. (2019). Identity construction of Les Milieux de Mémoire Sombre: An interpretivist approach [unpublished Ph.D. dissertation]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
   Google Scholar
• Greckhamer, T., & Koro-Ljunberg, M. (2005). The erosion of method: Examples from grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(6), 729–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500298204
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, E. (2007). The active reader: Strategies for academic Reading and writing. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, I., & Todres, L. (2003). The status of method: Flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794103033004
   Google Scholar
• Kacprzak, K. (2017). From bad through good to excellent interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) studies–presenting set of criteria to evaluate IPA papers and to provide high-quality future research. The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society, 8(2), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20172.53.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korb, K. (2012). Conducting educational research. Adopting or adapting an instrument. Retrieved from Educational psychology: Adopting or adapting instruments (korbedpsych.com)
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, M., Watts, S., & Clifton, E. (2006). Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp062oa
   Google Scholar
• Lê, J., & Schmid, T. (2022). The practice of innovating research methods. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 308–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120935498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoBiondi-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Integrating research, evidence-based practice, and quality improvement processes. In G. LoBiondi-Wood & J. Haber (Eds.), Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice (pp. 5–22). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Luckhardt, C., & Bechtel, W. (1994). How to do things with logic. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McWha, M., Frost, W., & Laing, J. (2018). Travel writers and the nature of self: Essentialism, transformation and (online) construction. Annals of Tourism Research, 70, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2018.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nizza, I. E., Farr, J., & Smith, J. A. (2021). Achieving excellence in interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): four markers of high quality. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1854404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, J. A. (2014). A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Psychological Journal, 20(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7
   Google Scholar
• Rydzik, A., Pritchard, A., Morgan, N., & Sedgley, D. (2017). Humanising migrant women’s work. Annals of Tourism Research, 64, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. (2011). The future's bright: Celebrating its achievements and preparing for the challenges ahead in IPA research. Health Psychology Review, 5(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.524808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinebourne, P. (2011). The theoretical underpinninings of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Existential Analysis, 11(1), 16–31.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 11(2), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449608400256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088704qp004oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2008). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2011a). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.510659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2011b). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A reply to the commentaries and further development of criteria. Health Psychology Review, 5(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.541743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2017). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Getting at lived experience. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 303–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Eatough, V. (2021). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 162–180). SAGE Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2021). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (2nd ed). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (1995). Rethinking methods in psychology. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Jarman, M., & Osborn, M. (1999). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In M. Murray & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology (pp. 218–240). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Osborn, M. (2008a). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In G. Breakwell (Ed.), Doing social psychology research (pp. 229–254). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Osborn, M. (2008b). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed., pp. 53–80). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Osborn, M. (2015). Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain. British Journal of Pain, 9(1), 41–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2049463714541642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkins, L., & Eatough, V. (2010). Reflecting on the use of IPA with focus groups: Pitfalls and potentials. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7(3), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880903121491
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, M., & Poulson, L. (2004). Critical Reading for self-critical writing. In L. Poulson & M. Wallace (Eds.), Learning to read critically in teaching and learning (pp. 3–36). SAGE.
   Google Scholar