University venture capital in big data, regional and historical perspective: where and why has it arisen?

References

• Abreu, M., and V. Grinevich. 2013. “The Nature of Academic Entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the Focus on Entrepreneurial Activities.” Research Policy 42 (2): 408–422. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albats, E., I. Fiegenbaum, and J. A. Cunningham. 2018. “A Micro Level Study of University Industry Collaborative Lifecycle Key Performance Indicators.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 43 (2): 389–431. doi:10.1007/s10961-017-9555-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, A. T., and D. P. Martin. 2013. “Intermediaries for Open Innovation: A Competence-Based Comparison of Knowledge Transfer Offices Practices.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80 (1): 38–49. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ante, S. E. 2008. Creative Capital: Georges Doriot and the Birth of Venture Capital. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beauhurst. 2022. “Free Report: High-Growth in London 2022.” Accessed January 26 2023. https://www.beauhurst.com/research/high-growth-london/
   Google Scholar
• Berle, A., and G. Means. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, S. R., C. S. Hayter, and A. N. Link. 2013. “Proof of Concept Centers in the United States: An Exploratory Look.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 38 (4): 349–381. doi:10.1007/s10961-013-9309-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breznitz, S.M., and H. Etzkowitz, eds. 2017. University Technology Transfer: The Globalization of Academic Innovation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. N., and C. H. Wu. 2020. “Complementary-In Use Appropriability in Innovative Service Firms: An Empirical Study in Taiwan.” Research Policy 49 (7): 104014. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. R. 1998. “Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation.” Issues in Higher Education. Elsevier Science Regional Sales, 665 Avenue of the Americas, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., R. R. Nelson, and J. Walsh. 2000. “Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (Or Not).” Working paper no. 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Croce, A., L. Grilli, and S. Murtinu. 2014. “Venture Capital Enters Academia: An Analysis of University-Managed Funds.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 39 (5): 688–715. doi:10.1007/s10961-013-9317-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Castro, L., and L. Sanz-Menéndez. 2016. “The Effects of the Economic Crisis on Public Research: Spanish Budgetary Policies and Research Organizations.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 113: 157–167. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper, W. H., III. 2011. The Startup Game: Inside the Partnership Between Venture Capitalists and Entrepreneurs. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duryea, E. D., and D. T. Williams. 2013. The Academic Corporation: A History of College and University Governing Boards. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Earls, A. R. 2004. Digital Equipment Corporation. Mount Pleasant, South Carolina: Arcadia Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Eberhardt, F. 2022. “Causal Models at Multiple Levels of Granularity.” SCLI workshop on logic, rationality & intelligent interaction. Stanford. May 22.
   Google Scholar
• Engwall, L. 2008. “The University: A Multinational Corporation.” The University in the Market 84: 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. 1983. “Entrepreneurial Scientists and Entrepreneurial Universities in American Academic Science.” Minerva 21 (2–3): 198–233. doi:10.1007/BF01097964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. 1993. “Enterprises from Science: The Origins of Science-Based Regional Economic Development.” Minerva 31 (3): 326–360. doi:10.1007/BF01098626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. 2002. MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. 2005. “Making Science Cities: The Triple Helix of Regional Growth and Renewal.” In Science Cities National Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. 2006. “The Renewal of Venture Capital: Toward a Counter-Cyclical Model.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 17 (1): 73–87. doi:10.1080/09537320500044578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. 2013. “StartX and the ‘Paradox of Success’: Filling the Gap in Stanford’s Entrepreneurial Culture.” Social Science Information 52 (4): 605–627. doi:10.1177/0539018413498833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and J. Beddows. 2020. “From Smart Specialization to Insightful Diversification.” Helice 9 (4). December.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., M. Gulbrandsen, and J. Levitt. 2000. Public Venture Capital. New York: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., F. Solé, and J. M. Piqué. 2007. “The Creation of Born Global Companies Within the Science Cities: An Approach from Triple Helix.” Engevista 9 (2): 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and C. Zhou. 2017. The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrary, M., and M. Granovetter. 2009. “The Role of Venture Capital Firms in Silicon Valley’s Complex Innovation Network.” Economy and Society 38 (2): 326–359. doi:10.1080/03085140902786827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, J., E. Hazelkorn, and P. Vallance, eds. 2016. The Civic University: The Policy and Leadership Challenges. Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gompers, P., and J. Lerner. 2001. “The Venture Capital Revolution.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (2): 145–168. doi:10.1257/jep.15.2.145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, M., M. Knockaert, B. Soppe, and M. Wright. 2019. “The Technology Transfer Ecosystem in Academia. An Organizational Design Perspective.” Technovation 82: 35–50. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. T., and C. M. Mason. 2000. “The Role of the Public Sector in the Development of a Regional Venture Capital Industry.” Venture Capital 2 (4): 243–253. doi:10.1080/13691060050176988.
   Google Scholar
• Hayter, C. S. 2016. “A Social Responsibility View of the Patent-Centric Linear Model of University Technology Transfer.” Duq L Rev 54: 7.
   Google Scholar
• Heughebaert, A., and S. Manigart. 2012. “Firm Valuation in Venture Capital Financing Rounds: The Role of Investor Bargaining Power.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 39 (3–4): 500–530. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.2012.02284.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, M., P. Crane, P. Nightingale, and C. Baden-Fuller. 2013. “‘Buying Big into Biotech: Scale, Financing and the Industrial Dynamics of UK Biotech, 1980-2009.” Industrial and Corporate Change 22 (4): 1–50. doi:10.1093/icc/dtt022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, P. F., C. S. Lee, and J. C. Ho. 2012. “Strategy and Process of Value Creation and Appropriation in Service Clusters.” Technovation 32 (7–8): 430–439. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, D. H. 2007. “Experienced Entrepreneurial Founders, Organizational Capital, and Venture Capital Funding.” Research Policy 36 (5): 722–741. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., and J. Yang. 2022. “Distinguishing Between Appropriability and Appropriation: A Systematic Review and a Renewed Conceptual Framing.” Research Policy 51 (1): 104417. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D., A. Iacopini, A. Micozzi, and S. Orsini. 2011. “Fostering Entrepreneurship in Academic Spin-Offs.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business 12 (4): 513–533. doi:10.1504/IJESB.2011.039689.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, D. M. 2008. “The (Not So) Puzzling Behavior of Angel Investors.” Vanderbilt Law Review 61: 1405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H. Y. 2020. “Patents as Assets: Intellectual Property Rights as Market Subjects and Objects.” In Assetization. Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism, edited by K. Birch and F. Muniesa, 50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keeble, D., C. Lawson, B. Moore, and F. Wilkinson. 1999. “Collective Learning Processes, Networking and ‘Institutional thickness’ in the Cambridge Region.” Regional Studies 33 (4): 319–332. doi:10.1080/713693557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, D. A. 2006. “Creating Entrepreneurial Universities in the UK: Applying Entrepreneurship Theory to Practice.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 31 (5): 599–603. doi:10.1007/s10961-006-9061-4.
   Google Scholar
• Kremer, M., A. K. Achleitner, and R. Braun. 2022. “University Venture Capital–The Promise and Pitfalls of University Direct Investments.” Available at SSRN 4016443. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4016443.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, L. 2003. “Leadership Redefined: An Evocative Context for Teacher Leadership.” School Leadership & Management 23 (4): 421–430. doi:10.1080/1363243032000150953.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton Smith, H., and J. Glasson. 2005. Public Research High-Tech Spin-Offs: Measuring Performance and Growth in Oxfordshire. Oxford: Oxfordshire Economic Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton Smith, H., and K W. Ho. 2006. “Measuring the Performance of Oxfordshire’s Spin-Off Companies.” Research Policy 35: 1554–1568. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton-Smith, H., S. Romeo, and R. Waters. 2013. “Entrepreneurship, Innovation and the Triple Helix Model: Evidence from Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire.” Working Paper. Birkbeck College,University of London, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Lockett, A., and M. Wright. 2005. “Resources, Capabilities, Risk Capital and the Creation of University Spin-Out Companies.” Research Policy 34 (7): 1043–1057. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockett, A., M. Wright, and S. Franklin. 2003. “Technology Transfer and Universities’ Spin-Out Strategies.” Small Business Economics 20 (2): 185–200. doi:10.1023/A:1022220216972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia, C., and J. Claro. 2013. “The Role of a Proof of Concept Center in a University Ecosystem: An Exploratory Study.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 38 (5): 641–650. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9246-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, G. D., P. H. Phan, D. B. Balkin, and P. T. Gianiodis. 2005. “Entrepreneurship and University-Based Technology Transfer.” Journal of Business Venturing 20 (2): 241–263. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mian, S. A. 2021. “Whither Modern Business Incubation? Definitions, Evolution, Theory, and Evaluation.” In Handbook of research on business and technology incubation and acceleration: A global perspective, edited by S.A. Mian, M. Klofsten, and W. Lamine. Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Minola, T., D. Donina, and M. Meoli. 2016. “Students Climbing the Entrepreneurial Ladder: Does University Internationalization Pay Off?” Small Business Economics 47 (3): 565–587. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9758-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, J. G., M. A. Serra, and M. J. Vieira. 2018. “Social Engagement in Latin American Universities.” Higher Education Policy 31 (4): 513–534. doi:10.1057/s41307-017-0069-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musselin, C. 2013. “Redefinition of the Relationships Between Academics and Their University.” Higher Education 65 (1): 25–37. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9579-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, T. 2016. 13. “The Origins of High-Tech Venture Investing in America.” Financial market history, 227. CFA Institute Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, G., and M. Hopkins. 2016. Science, the State and the City. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Pary, N., and O. Witmeur. 2019. “Financing for New Technology-Based Firms in Brussels.” Brussels Studies: La revue scientifique pour les recherches sur Bruxelles/Het wetenschappelijk tijdschrift voor onderzoek over Brussel/The Journal of Research on Brussels. doi:10.4000/brussels.2227.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., M. McKelvey, and N. Phillips. 2019. “Protecting Scientists from Gordon Gekko: How Organizations Use Hybrid Spaces to Engage with Multiple Institutional Logics.” Organization Science 30 (2): 298–318. doi:10.1287/orsc.2018.1228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittaway, L., P. Benedict, Z. Bedő, K. Erdős, and E. Flournoy. 2022. “Exploring Venture Funding in the Entrepreneurial University.” In Strategies for the Creation and Maintenance of Entrepreneurial Universities, edited by C. Henry, B.F.C.C. Gabriel, K. Sailer, E. Bernadó-Mansilla, and K. Lahikainen, 194–221. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast, P. J., and M. Hennessy. 2016. Global Research Questions and Institutional Research Strategies. edited by, L. Weber and J.J. Duderstadt, 143–154. University priorities and constraints Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Quince, S. 1985. The Cambridge Phenomenon: The Growth of High Technology Industry in a University Town. Cambridge, UK: Segal Quince and Partners.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, E. 2008. “Government Instruments to Support the Commercialization of University Research: Lessons from Canada.” Technovation 28 (8): 506–517. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, E. B. 1991. Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond. Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sako, M., and M. Qian. 2021. “A Taxonomy for Technology Venture Ecosystems.” Available at SSRN 3822606.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, N. S. 1986. “Universities and Technological Entrepreneurship in Britain: Some Implications of the Cambridge Phenomenon.” Technovation 4 (3): 189–204. doi:10.1016/0166-4972(86)90012-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapira, P., and T. Rephann. 1996. “The Adoption of New Technology in West Virginia: Implications for Manufacturing Modernization Policies.” Environment and Planning: C, Government & Policy 14 (4): 431–450. doi:10.1068/c140431.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. S., and M. Wright. 2015. “University Technology Transfer Offices, Licensing, and Start-Ups.” Chicago Handbook of University Technology Transfer and Academic Entrepreneurship 1 (40): 84–103.
   Google Scholar
• Simmie, J., and R. Martin. 2010. “The Economic Resilience of Regions: Towards an Evolutionary Approach.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3 (1): 27–43. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsp029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. L., S. Bagchi-Sen, and L. Edmunds. 2019. “Universities, the bioscience sector and local economic development in Oxfordshire: challenges and opportunities.” In Handbook of universities and regional development, edited by A. Varga and K. Erdős, 230–250. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. J. 2004. “The Enactment of Bayh–Dole.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 29 (1): 93–99. doi:10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011183.40867.52.
   Google Scholar
• Suard, G., and R. Baldegger. 2018. “Open Innovation Dynamics in an Entrepreneurship Ecosystem.” In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Interdisciplinary Conference on Entrepreneurship, Innovation and SMEs (No. CONFERENCE), Stuttgart, German, October 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Su, M., Y. Y. Tan, Q. M. Liu, Y. J. Ren, I. Kawachi, L. M. Li, and J. Lv. 2014. “Association Between Perceived Urban Built Environment Attributes and Leisure-Time Physical Activity Among Adults in Hangzhou, China.” Preventive Medicine 66: 60–64. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., and Y. Zhai. 2018. “Mapping the Knowledge Domain and the Theme Evolution of Appropriability Research Between 1986 and 2016: A Scientometric Review.” Scientometrics 116 (1): 203–230. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2748-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 1986. “Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy.” Research Policy 15 (6): 285–305. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, M., A. Lockett, B. Clarysse, and M. Binks. 2006. “University Spin-Out Companies and Venture Capital.” Research Policy 35 (4): 481–501. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., E. Albats, and H. Etzkowitz. 2021. “Interdisciplinary Organization as a Basic Academic Unit?” Industry and Higher Education 35 (3): 173–187. doi:10.1177/0950422220956951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, C. 2014. “Four Dimensions to Observe a Triple Helix: Invention of ‘Cored Model’and Differentiation of Institutional and Functional Spheres.” Triple Helix 1 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1186/s40604-014-0011-0.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, C. 2017. “China’s University Technology Transfer System: Political Mobilization and Academy for Economic Growth.” In University technology transfer: the globalization of academic innovation, edited by S.M. Breznitz and H. Etzkowitz, 381–410. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., and X. M. Peng. 2008. “The Entrepreneurial University in China: Nonlinear Paths.” Science & Public Policy 35 (9): 637–646. doi:10.3152/030234208X363187.
   Google Scholar