2,693
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Steps toward cosmopolitanism in the study of media technologies

&
Pages 560-571 | Received 28 Sep 2012, Accepted 14 Feb 2013, Published online: 14 Jun 2013

References

  • Abbate, J. (2000). Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Bardini, T. (2000). Bootstrapping: Douglas Engelbart, coevolution, and the origins of personal computing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Beck, U. (2000). The cosmopolitan perspective: Sociology of the second age of modernity. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 79–105. doi: 10.1080/000713100358444
  • Beck, U. (2002). The cosmopolitan society and its enemies. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(1–2), 17–44. doi: 10.1177/026327640201900101
  • Beck, U. (2004). Cosmopolitical realism: On the distinction between cosmopolitanism in philosophy and the social sciences. Global Networks, 4(2), 131–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2004.00084.x
  • Beck, U. (2006). Cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Beck, U., & Sznaider, N. (2006). Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: A research agenda. British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x
  • Bijker, W. E. (2010). How is technology made? – That is the question! Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 63–76. doi: 10.1093/cje/bep068
  • Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (Eds.) (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Bird, S. E. (2003). The audience in everyday life: Living in a media world. London: Routledge.
  • Boczkowski, P. J. (2010). News at work: Imitation in an age of information abundance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Boczkowski, P. J., & Lievrouw, L. A. (2007). Bridging STS and communication studies: Scholarship on media and information technologies. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed., pp. 949–977). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Callon, M. (2004). The role of hybrid communities and socio-technical arrangements in the participatory design. Journal of the Center for Information Studies, 5(3), 3–10.
  • Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
  • Douglas, S. J. (1987). Inventing American broadcasting, 1899–1922. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Du Gay, P., Hall, S., Jones, L., Mackay, H., & Negus, K. (1997). Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Fine, R. (2007). Cosmopolitanism. New York: Routledge.
  • Fischer, C. S. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Fiske, J. (1992). Audiencing: A cultural studies approach to watching television. Poetics, 21, 345–359. doi: 10.1016/0304-422X(92)90013-S
  • Gamson, J. (1994). Claims to fame: Celebrity in contemporary America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what's news: A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Gitlin, T. (2000). Inside prime time. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Grindstaff, L. (2002). The money shot: Trash, class, and the making of TV talk shows. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hayles, N. K. (2002). Writing machines. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Hayles, N. K. (2005). My mother was a computer: Digital subjects and literary texts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hess, D. J. (2001). Ethnography and the development of science and technology studies. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, L. Lofland, & J. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 234–245). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hyysalo, S. (2010). Health technology development and use: From practice bound imagination to evolving impacts. London: Routledge.
  • Jensen, K. B. (1990). Television futures: A social action methodology for studying interpretive communities. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7(2), 129–146. doi: 10.1080/15295039009360169
  • Jensen, K. B. (2010). Media convergence: The three degrees of network, mass and interpersonal communication. New York: Routledge.
  • Jin, H. (2011). British cultural studies, active audiences and the status of cultural theory: An interview with David Morley. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(4), 124–144. doi: 10.1177/0263276411398268
  • Katz, J. E., & Rice, R. E. (2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Law, J. (2010). The materials of STS. In D. Hicks & M. C. Beaudry (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of material culture studies (pp. 173–188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1993). The export of meaning: Cross-cultural readings of Dallas. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Ling, R. S. (2008). New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Livingstone, S. (2004). The challenge of changing audiences. Or, what is the audience researcher to do in the age of the Internet? European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 75–86. doi: 10.1177/0267323104040695
  • Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about electric communication in the late nineteenth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • McLuhan, M. (1968). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Morley, D. (1980). The ‘nationwide’ audience. Structure and decoding. London: British Film Institute.
  • Morley, D. (2011). Decoding diaspora and disjuncture – Arjun Appadurai in dialogue with David Morley. New Formations, 73, 39–51.
  • Mosco, V. (1982). Pushbutton fantasies: Critical perspectives on videotex and information technology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Mosco, V., & McKercher, C. (2008). The laboring of communication: Will knowledge workers of the world unite? Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
  • Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (Eds.) (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 17–50). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Pinch, T., & Trocco, F. (2002). Analog days: The invention and impact of the moog synthesizer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Radway, J. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Rice, R. E., & Rogers, E. M. (1980). Re-invention in the innovation process. Knowledge, 1, 449–514.
  • Rip, A., & Schot, J. (2002). Identifying loci for influencing the dynamics of technological development. In R. Williams & K. Sorensen (Eds.), Shaping technology, guiding policy (pp. 155–172). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
  • Schot, J., & de la Bruhèze, A. A. (2003). The mediated design of products, consumption and consumers in the twentieth century. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology (pp. 229–245). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Scolari, C. A. (2012). Media ecology: Exploring the metaphor to expand the theory. Communication Theory, 22(2), 204–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01404.x
  • Siles, I. (2011). From online filter to Web format: Articulating materiality and meaning in the early history of blogs. Social Studies of Science, 41(5), 737–758. doi: 10.1177/0306312711420190
  • Siles, I. (2012). The rise of blogging: Articulation as a dynamic of technological stabilization. New Media & Society, 14(5), 781–797. doi: 10.1177/1461444811425222
  • Siles, I., & Boczkowski, P. J. (2012). At the intersection of content and materiality: A texto-material perspective on agency in the use of media technologies. Communication Theory, 22(3), 227–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01408.x
  • Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. London: Routledge.
  • Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Sterne, J. (2003). The audible past: Cultural origins of sound reproduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Sterne, J. (2006). The mp3 as cultural artifact. New Media & Society, 8(5), 825–842. doi: 10.1177/1461444806067737
  • Strate, L. (2006). Echoes and reflections: On media ecology as a field of study. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Thompson, E. A. (2002). The soundscape of modernity: Architectural acoustics and the culture of listening in America, 1900–1933. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Valente, T. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1995). The origins and development of the diffusion of innovations paradigm as an example of scientific growth. Science Communication, 16(3), 242–273. doi: 10.1177/1075547095016003002
  • Wajcman, J., & Jones, P. K. (2012). Border communication: Media sociology and STS. Media, Culture & Society, 34(6), 673–690. doi: 10.1177/0163443712449496
  • Wasko, J. (1982). Movies and money: Financing the American film industry. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Williams, R. (1975). Television: Technology and cultural form. New York: Schocken Books.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.