1,717
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Online political participation, civic talk, and media multiplexity: how Taiwanese citizens express political opinions on the Web

&
Pages 26-44 | Received 16 Aug 2012, Accepted 05 Aug 2013, Published online: 05 Sep 2013

References

  • Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: Divided they blog. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery, Chicago, IL.
  • Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 573–590. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922
  • Best, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2006). Online interactions and social capital: Distinguishing between new and existing ties. Social Science Computer Review, 24(4), 395–410. doi: 10.1177/0894439306286855
  • Bimber, B. A. (2001). Information and political engagement in America: The search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 53–67. doi: 10.1177/106591290105400103
  • Bimber, B. A. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of politcial power. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Boase, J. (2008). Personal networks and the personal comunication system: Using multiple media to connect. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4), 490–508. doi: 10.1080/13691180801999001
  • Boase, J., Horrigan, J., Wellman, B., & Rainie, L. (2006). The strength of internet ties. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
  • Boulianne, S. (2009). Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-Analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211. doi: 10.1080/10584600902854363
  • Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. The American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294. doi: 10.2307/2082425
  • Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (2001). The private roots of public action: Gender, equality, and political participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Central Election Commission Taiwan. (2012). Database of presidential elections. available from central election commission database of elections Retrieved January 25, 2013, from central election commission Taiwan. Retrieved from http://db.cec.gov.tw/
  • Chen, Y.-N. K., & Lo, V.-H. (2006). Media use and political capital. Mass Communication Research (Xinwenxue Yanjiu in Chinese), 88, 83–134.
  • van Cleemput, K. (2010). ‘I'll see you on IM, text, or call you’: A social network approach of adolescents’ use of communication media. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(2), 75–85. doi: 10.1177/0270467610363143
  • Di Gennaro, C., & Dutton, W. (2006). The internet and the public: Online and offline oolitical participation in the United Kingdom. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(2), 299–313. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsl004
  • Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook ‘Friends’: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892. doi: 10.1177/1461444810385389
  • Finkel, S. E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 891–913. doi: 10.2307/2111186
  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1982). Charting the mainstream: Television's contributions to political orientations. Journal of Communication, 32(2), 100–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1982.tb00500.x
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38(3), 397–421. doi: 10.1177/0093650210384984
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & Shah, D. (2010). Digital democracy: Reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(1), 36–51. doi: 10.1080/19331680903316742
  • Hampton, K. N. (2011). Comparing bonding and bridging ties for democratic engagement – everyday use of communication technologies within social networks for civic and civil behaviors. Information, Communication & Society, 14(4), 510–528. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.562219
  • Hampton, K. N., Sessions, L. F., & Her, E. J. (2011). Core networks, social isolation, and new media: Internet and mobile phone use, network size, and diversity. Information, Communication and Society, 14(1), 130–155. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2010.513417
  • Hampton, K. N., & Wellman, B. (2003). Neighboring in netville: How the internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City and Community, 2(4), 277–311. doi: 10.1046/j.1535-6841.2003.00057.x
  • Hargittai, E. (2008). The digital reproduction of inequality. In D. B. Grusky, M. C. Ku, & S. Szelényi (Eds.), Social stratification: Class, race, and gender in sociological perspective (pp. 936–944). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the ‘Net Generation’. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
  • Hargittai, E., Gallo, J., & Kane, M. (2008). Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers. Public Choice, 134(1), 67–86.
  • Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of differentiated practices on social network sites. Information, Communication and Society, 13(4), 515–536. doi: 10.1080/13691181003639866
  • Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125–147. doi: 10.1080/13691180500146185
  • Haythornthwaite, C., & Rice, R. E. (2006). Perspectives on Internet Use: Access, Involvement and Interaction. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of new media: Social shaping and social consequences of ICTs (Updated Student ed., pp. 92–113). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hogan, B. (2008). Networking in everyday life (Doctoral dissertation), University of Toronto, Toronto. Retrieved from http://individual.utoronto.ca/berniehogan/Hogan_NIEL_10--29--2008_FINAL.pdf
  • Hsieh, Y. P. (2012). Online social networking skills: The social affordances approach to digital inequality. First Monday, 17(4). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3893/3192
  • Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1987). Networks in context: The social flow of political information. The American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1197–1216. doi: 10.2307/1962585
  • Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1991). Discussant effects on vote choice: Intimacy, structure, and interdependence. The Journal of Politics, 53(1), 122–158. doi: 10.2307/2131724
  • Ikeda, K. I., & Boase, J. (2011). Multiple discussion networks and their consequence for political participation. Communication Research, 38(5), 660–683. doi: 10.1177/0093650210395063
  • Jennings, M. K., & Zeitner, V. (2003). Internet use and civic engagement: A longitudinal analysis. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(3), 311–334. doi: 10.1086/376947
  • Katz, J. E., & Rice, R. E. (2002). Syntopia: Access, civic involvement and social interaction on the internet. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 114–138). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Kavanaugh, A., Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Zin, T. T., & Reese, D. D. (2005). Community networks: Where offline communities meet online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), 0–0. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00266.x
  • Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 50(2), 173–192. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1
  • Kim, H., Kim, G. J., Park, H. W., & Rice, R. E. (2007). Configurations of relationships in different media: FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1183–1207. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00369.x
  • Kim, Y., Hsu, S.-H., Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Communication, 63, 498–516. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12034
  • Klofstad, C. A. (2011). Civic talk: Peers, politics, and the future of democracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Klofstad, C. A., McClurg, S. D., & Rolfe, M. (2009). Measurement of political discussion networks: A comparison of two ‘Name Generator’ procedures. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(3), 462–483. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfp032
  • Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, K. I., & Miyata, K. (2006). Social capital online: Collective use of the internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Information, Communication & Society, 9(5), 582–611. doi: 10.1080/13691180600965575
  • Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Tridas, M., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?. American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017
  • Lake, R. L. D., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19(3), 567–584. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00118
  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1968). The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Ledbetter, A. M. (2008). Media use and relational closeness in long-term friendships: Interpreting patterns of multimodality. New Media & Society, 10(4), 547–564. doi: 10.1177/1461444808091224
  • Ledbetter, A. M. (2009). Patterns of media use and multiplexity: Associations with sex, geographic distance and friendship interdependence. New Media & Society, 11(7), 1187–1208. doi: 10.1177/1461444809342057
  • Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475
  • Li, M.-H., & Feeney, M. K. (2012). Adoption of electronic technologies in local U.S. governments: Distinguishing between E-Services and communication technologies. The American Review of Public Administration. doi: 10.1177/0275074012460910
  • Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., Moy, P., Horowitz, E. M., Holbert, R. L., Zhang, W., … Zubric, J. (1999). Understanding deliberation: The effects of discussion networks on participation in a public forum. Communication Research, 26(6), 743–774. doi: 10.1177/009365099026006005
  • Mesch, G. S. (2009). Social context and communication channels choice among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 244–251. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.09.007
  • Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Mutz, D. C. (2002). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96(01), 111–126. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402004264
  • Nie, N., Hillygus, S., & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet use, interpersonal relations and sociability: A time diary study. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 244–262). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2004). Political talks as a catalyst for online citizenship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(4), 877–896. doi: 10.1177/107769900408100410
  • Norris, P. (2004). The bridging and bonding role of online communities. In P. N. Howard & S. G. Jones (Eds.), Society online: The interaction in context (pp. 31–42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • O'brien, R. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. doi: 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
  • O'Neill, B. (2010). The media's role in shaping canadian civic and political engagement. Policy and Society, 29(1), 37–51. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.11.004
  • Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  • Robinson, J. P., Barth, K., & Kohut, A. (1997). Social impact research: Personal computers, mass media, and use of time. Social Science Computer Review, 15(1), 65–82. doi: 10.1177/089443939701500107
  • Rojas, H., Shah, D. V., & Friedland, L. A. (2011). A communicative approach to social capital. Journal of Communication, 61(4), 689–712. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01571.x
  • Scheufele, D. A., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I. S., & Nisbet, E. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 728–753. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00317.x
  • Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P. J. R., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531–565. doi: 10.1177/0093650205279209
  • Shklovski, I., Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. E. (2006). The internet and social interaction: A meta-Analysis and critique of studies, 1995–2003. In R. E. Kraut, M. Brynin, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Computers, phones, and the internet: Domesticating information technology (pp. 251–264). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stern, M. J., & Adams, A. E. (2010). Do rural residents really use the internet to build social capital? An empirical investigation. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(9), 1389–1422. doi: 10.1177/0002764210361692
  • Tian, Y. (2011). Communication behaviors as mediators: Examining links between political orientation, political communication, and political participation. Communication Quarterly, 59(3), 380–394. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2011.583503
  • Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2003). Unraveling the effects of the internet on political participation? Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 175–185.
  • Uslaner, E. M. (1998). Social capital, television, and the ‘mean world’: Trust, optimism, and civic participation. Political Psychology, 19(3), 441–467. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00113
  • Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2012). Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 163–184. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edr037
  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wang, S.-I. (2007). Political use of the internet, political attitudes and political participation. [Article]. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(4), 381–395. doi: 10.1080/01292980701636993
  • Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W.-H., Hampton, K., Díaz, I., & Miyata, K. (2003). The social affordances of the internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x
  • Xenos, M., & Moy, P. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 704–718. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00364.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.