Hitting middle age never felt so good: introduction to the American Sociological Association Communication and Information Technologies section 2013 special issue

References

• Ackland, R. (2009). Social network services as data sources and platforms for e-researching social networks. Social Science Computer Review, 27(4), 481–492. doi:10.1177/0894439309332291 doi: 10.1177/0894439309332291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bail, C. A. (2012). The fringe effect: Civil society organizations and the evolution of media discourse about Islam since the September 11th attacks. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 855–879. doi:10.1177/0003122412465743 doi: 10.1177/0003122412465743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, J. L. (2011). Youth and the generation of political consciousness online (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). The social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307–336. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307 doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J. (2006). Pursuing social change online: The use of four protest tactics on the Internet. Social Science Computer Review, 24(3), 362–377. doi: 10.1177/0894439305284627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J. (2013). Studying online activism: The effects of sampling design on findings. Mobilization, 18(4), 389–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the Internet age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J., Kimport, K., Prieto, G., Rush, C., & Reynoso, K. (2010). Changing the world one webpage at a time: Conceptualizing and explaining internet activism. Mobilization, 15(4), 425–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J., & Schussman, A. (2003). The new site of activism: On-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision-making. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change, 24, 155–187. doi:10.1016/S0163-786X(03)80024-1 doi: 10.1016/S0163-786X(03)80024-1
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., Metzger, M. J., Hartsell, E., Markov, A., Medders, R., Pure, R., & Choi, E. (2010). Kids and credibility: An empirical examination of youth, digital media use, and information credibility. Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Garrido, M., & Halavais, A. (2003). Mapping networks of support for the Zapatista movement: Applying social-networks analysis to study contemporary social movements. In M. McCaughey & M. D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp. 165–184). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, K. (2003). Grieving for a lost network: Collective action in a wired suburbspecial issue: ICTs and community networking. The Information Society, 19(5), 417–428. doi:10.1080/714044688 doi: 10.1080/714044688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, K. N., Sessions, L. F., & Her, E. J. (2009). Social isolation and new technology: How the Internet and mobile phones impact Americans’ social networks. In P. I. A. L. Project (Ed.). Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2009/PIP_Tech_and_Social_Isolation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2009). An update on survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, 27(1), 130–137. doi:10.1177/0894439308318213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y.-l. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of differentiated practices on social network sites. Information, Communication & Society, 13(4), 515–536. doi:10.1080/13691181003639866 doi: 10.1080/13691181003639866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. E., Rice, R. E., & Aspden, P. (2001). The Internet, 1995–2000: Access, civic involvement, and social interaction. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 404–419. doi:10.1177/0002764201045003004 doi: 10.1177/00027640121957268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• della Porta, D., & Mosca, L. (2005). Global-net for global movements? A network of networks for a movement of movements. Journal of Public Policy, 25, 165–190. doi:10.1017/S0143814X05000255 doi: 10.1017/S0143814X05000255
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., & Katz, J. E. (2004). The Internet and political involvement in 1996 and 2000. In P.N. Howard & S. Jones (Eds.), Society online: The internet in context (pp. 103–120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schussman, A., & Earl, J. (2004). From barricades to firewalls? Strategic voting and social movement leadership in the Internet age. Sociological Inquiry, 74(4), 439–463. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2004.00100.x doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2004.00100.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, L. (2009). Social movement web use in theory and practice: A content analysis of us movement websites. New Media and Society, 11(5), 749–771. doi:10.1177/1461444809105350 doi: 10.1177/1461444809105350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M. A. (2004). Link analysis: An information science approach. San Diego, CA: Emerald Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. (2006). On and off the net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 593–628. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00029.x doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. E., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59, 40–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar