Family dynamics and Internet use in Britain: What role do children play in adults' engagement with the Internet?

References

• Aarsand, P. (2007). Computer and video games in family life: The digital divide as a resource in intergenerational interactions. Childhood, 14, 235–256. doi:10.1177/0907568207078330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
   Google Scholar
• Chesley, N. (2006). Families in a high-tech age. Technology usage patterns, work and family correlates, and gender. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 587–608. doi:10.1177/0192513X05285187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, C. (2011). Digitally strategic: How young people respond to parental views about the use of technology for learning in the home. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 324–335. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00427.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durndell, A., & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 521–536. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00006-7
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, W. H., & Blank, G. (2011). Next generation users: The Internet in Britain. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Eynon, R., & Malmberg, L. E. (2012). Understanding the online information-seeking behaviours of young people: The role of networks of support. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 514–529. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00460.x
   Google Scholar
• Haddon, L. (2004). Information and communication technologies in everyday life: A concise introduction and research guide. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Haddon, L. (2005, May). Personal information culture: The contribution of research on ICTs in everyday life. Paper presented at the UNESCO conference between Two Phases of the World Summit on the Information Society?, St. Petersburg, Russia.
   Google Scholar
• Haddon, L. (2006). The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Information Society, 22(4), 195–203. doi:10.1080/01972240600791325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2003). Informed web surfing: The social context of user sophistication. In P. Howard & S. Jones (Eds.), Society online (pp. 257–274). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J. (2010). Gendered internet use across generations and life stages. Communication Research, 37, 352–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital inclusion. Communication Theory, 22, 403–426. doi:10.1177/0093650209356439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36, 503–520. doi:10.1080/01411920902989227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingworth, S., Mansaray, A., Allen, K., & Rose, A. (2011). Parents’ perspectives on technology and children's learning in the home: Social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 347–360. doi:10.1111/j.1365–2729.2011.00431.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, S. L., & Valentine, G. (2003). Cyberkids. Children in the information age. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, R., & Hans, J. D. (2001). Computers, the internet, and families – a review of the role new technology plays in family life. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 776–790. doi:10.1177/019251301022006006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., & Parashar, U. (2011). Technology and learning at home: Findings from the evaluation of the home access programme pilot. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 303–313. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00434.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, T., Smith, A., Wells, A. T., & Wellman, B. (2008). Networked families. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, N., & Facer, K. (2004). Different worlds? A comparison of young people's home and school ICT use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 440–455. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00102.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., Zdaniuk, B., Lundmark, V., & Kraut, R. (2000). Troubles with the internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human Computer Interaction, 15, 323–351. doi:10.1207/S15327051HCI1504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korupp, S. E., & Szydlik, M. (2005). Causes and trends of the digital divide. European Sociological Review, 21, 409–422. doi:10.1093/esr/jci030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lally, E. (2002). At home with computers. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• LaRose, R., Mastro, D., & Eastin, M. S. (2001). Understanding Internet usage a social-cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review, 19(4), 395–413. doi:10.1177/089443930101900401
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Technical report and user guide: The 2010 EU kids online survey. London: London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Macgill, A R. (2007). Parent and teenager internet use: Data memo. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/
   Google Scholar
• Murdock, G., Hartmann, P., & Grey, P. (1992). Contextualising home computing: Resources and practices. In R. Silverstone & E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming technologies. Media and information in domestic spaces (chapter 9, pp. 146–160). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Passey, D. (2011). Evaluation of Aston Pride ICT Development Project. Lancaster: University of Lancaster.
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schermerhon, A. C., & Cummings, E. M. (2008). Transactional family dynamics: A new framework for conceptualising family influence processes. Advances in Child Behaviour, 36, 187–250. doi:10.1016/S0065-2407(08)00005-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield Clark, L. (2009). Digital media and the generation gap. Information, Communication & Society, 12, 388–407. doi:10.1080/13691180902823845
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2004a). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media and Society, 6, 341–362. doi:10.1177/1461444804042519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2004b). Exploring the role of children in adults’ adoption and use of computers. Information Technology and People, 17, 53–70. doi:10.1108/09593840410522170
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2005). The social processes of learning to use computers. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 122–135. doi:10.1177/0894439304271553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, O. (2011). From public policy to family practices: Researching the everyday realities of families’ technology use at home. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 336–346. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00430.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp, L. M. (2010). The computer is not for you to be looking around, it is for schoolwork: Challenges for digital inclusion as Latino immigrant families negotiate children's access to the internet. New Media and Society, 13, 552–567. doi:10.1177/1461444810375293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valckea, M., Bontea, S., De Wevera, B., & Rotsa, I. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the impact on internet use of primary school children. Computers & Education, 55, 454–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbroeck, M., Verschelden, G., & Boonaert, T. (2008). E-learning in a low-status female profession: The role of motivation, anxiety and social support in the learning divide. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 181–190. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00252.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4–5), 221–235. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Van Rompaey, V., Roe, K., & Struys, K. (2002). Children's influence on internet access at home: Adoption and use in the family context. Information Communication and Society, 5, 189–206. doi:10.1080/13691180210130770
   Google Scholar
• Watt, D., & White, J. M. (1999). Computers and family life: A family developmental perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P., & Selwyn, N. (2013). Moving on-line? An analysis of patterns of adult internet use in the UK 2002–2010. Information, Communication and Society, 16, 1–27. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.611816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. (2009). Parental education and children's online health information seeking: Beyond the digital divide debate. Social Science and Medicine, 69, 1501–1505. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar