Mind the skills gap: the role of Internet know-how and gender in differentiated contributions to Wikipedia

References

• Alderson, A. S., Junisbai, A., & Heacock, A. (2007). Social status and cultural consumption in the United States. Poetics, 35, 191–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antin, J., Yee, R., Cheshire, C., & Nov, O. (2011). Gender differences in Wikipedia editing. ACM WikiSym, Mountain View, California, 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. D. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase's penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. The Yale Law Journal, 112, 369–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, W. D., DeMeritt, J. H. R., & Esarey, J. (2010). Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: Is a product term essential? American Journal of Political Science, 54, 248–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, W. D., Rubin, J. H., & Esarey, J. (in press). Bias and overconfidence in parametric models of interactive processes. American Journal of Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, G. (2013). Who creates content? Stratification and content creation on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 16, 590–612. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2013.777758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braumoeller, B. F. (2004). Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction terms. International Organization, 58, 807–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Ren, Y., & Riedl, J. (2010). The effects of diversity on group productivity and member withdrawal in online volunteer groups. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, NY, 821–830.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N. (2011). Define gender gap? Look up Wikipedia's contributor list. The New York Times, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, B., & Bear, J. (2012). Conflict, criticism, or confidence: An empirical examination of the gender gap in Wikipedia contributions. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, 383–392.
   Google Scholar
• ComScore. (2013). comScore Media Metrix Ranks Top 50 US Web Properties for May 2013. Reston, VA: ComScore.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, T. (2010). The participation divide among ‘Online Experts': Experience, skills and psychological factors as predictors of college students’ web content creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 71–92. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.2010.01532.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 23(4), 525–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2010). Measuring internet skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(10), 891–916.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media Culture and Society, 31, 41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2005). The deepening divide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355–400). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Ostrower, F. (1990). Participation in the arts by Black and White Americans. Social Forces, 68, 753–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Useem, M. (1978). Social class and arts consumption: The origins and consequences of class differences in exposure to the arts in America. Theory and Society, 5, 141–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, W. H., & Blank, G. (2011). Next generation users: The Internet in Britain. Oxford Internet Survey 2011. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1960655
   Google Scholar
• Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.2000.tb00110.x
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, S., & Steiner, L. (2013). (Re)triggering backlash: Responses to news about Wikipedia's gender gap. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 37, 284–303. doi:10.1177/0196859913505618
   Google Scholar
• Filipacchi, A. (2013). Wikipedia's sexism. The New York Times, p. SR3.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, R. J. (1982). In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 797–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleick, J. (2013, April 29). Wikipedia's women problem. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2013/apr/29/wikipedia-women-problem/
   Google Scholar
• Glott, R., Ghosh, R., & Schmidt, P. (2010). Wikipedia survey. Maastricht: UNU-MERIT.
   Google Scholar
• Halfaker, A., Geiger, R. S., Morgan, J. T., & Riedl, J. (2012). The rise and decline of an open collaboration system: How Wikipedia's reaction to popularity is causing its decline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 664–688. doi:10.1177/0002764212469365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfaker, A., Kittur, A., & Riedl, J. (2011). Don't bite the newbies: how reverts affect the quantity and quality of Wikipedia work. Paper presented at the ACM WikiSym Mountain View, California.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2000). Open portals or closed gates? Channeling content on the world wide web. Poetics, 27(4), 233–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35, 602–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2012). Succinct survey measures of Web-use skills. Social Science Computer Review, 30(1), 95–107.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2013). Digital inequality. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), Oxford handbook for Internet research (pp. 129–150). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Litt, E. (2011). The tweet smell of celebrity success: Explaining variation in Twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults. New Media & Society, 13(5), 824–842. doi:10.1177/1461444811405805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly 87(2), 432–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication and Society, 11, 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Hassani, S. N. (2006). Locating digital divides at home, work, and everywhere else. Poetics, 34, 250–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, B. M., & Shaw, A. (2013). The Wikipedia gender gap revisited: Characterizing survey response bias in peer production communities. PLOS ONE, 8(6), e65782. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065782
   Google Scholar
• Holland, P. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the Internet: The impact of a diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 383–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Greene, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, T., Wellman, B., & Klement, D. (2003). Gendering the digital divide. IT & Society, 1.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 341–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut, R. E., & Resnick, P. (2011). Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriplean, T., Beschastnikh, I., & McDonald, D. W. (2008). Articulations of Wikiwork: Uncovering valued work in Wikipedia through barnstars. ACM CSCW ’08, 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, S. K., Uduwage, A., Dong, Z., Sen, S., Musicant, D. R., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. (2011). WP:Clubhouse?: An Exploration of Wikipedia's Gender Imbalance. ACM WikiSym ’11, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. W., Javanmardi, S., & Zachry, M. (2011). Finding patterns in behavioral observations by automatically labeling forms of wikiwork in Barnstars. ACM WikiSym '11, 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. T., Bouterse, S., Walls, H., & Stierch, S. (2013). Tea and sympathy: Crafting positive new user experiences on Wikipedia. ACM Computer Supported Cooperative Work, San Antonio, Texas, 839–848.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Opinion Research Center. (2000). General social survey information society module. Chicago, IL: NORC.
   Google Scholar
• Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y. J. (2013). Digital literacy and privacy behavior online. Communication Research, 40, 215–236. doi:10.1177/0093650211418338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, A., & Vaisey, S. (2008). Parallel public spheres: Distance and discourse in letters to the editor. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 781–810. doi:10.1086/590647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schradie, J. (2011). The digital production gap: The digital divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetics, 39, 145–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US News & World Report. (2009). America's Best College 2010. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, I. M., & Richmond-Abbott, M. (2005). Gender and the Internet: Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 252–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welser, H. T., Cosley, D., Kossinets, G., Lin, A., Dokshin, F., Gay, G., & Smith, M. (2011). Finding social roles in Wikipedia. iConference Fort Worth, Texas, 122–129.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Huang, W., & Wang, Q. (2010). Internet inequality: The relationship between high school students’ Internet use in different locations and their Internet self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 55, 1405–1423. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zickuhr, K., & Smith, A. (2012). Digital differences, Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Zillien, N., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: Status-specific Internet uses. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar