Twitter and elections: are tweets, predictive, reactive, or a form of buzz?

References

• ABC News. (2011). @Jon2012Girls Talk Twitter, Politics & Dad. ABC News.
   Google Scholar
• Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013). National politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 291–314. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benamara, F., Cesarano, C., Picariello, A., Recupero, D. R., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2007). Sentiment analysis: Adjectives and adverbs are better than adjectives alone. Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, J., & Laschever, E. (2011). The tea party movement, framing, and the US media. Social Movement Studies, 10(4), 341–366. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2011.614104
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2009). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caldarelli, G., & Chessa, A., Pammolli, F., Pompa, G., Puliga, M., Riccaboni, M., & Riotta, G. (2014). A multi-level geographical study of Italian political elections from Twitter data. PloS one, 9(5), e95809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, J. E., & Mustafaraj, E. (2011). Can collective sentiment expressed on Twitter predict political elections? 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Cillizza, C. (2012). South Carolina Republican Debate: Winners and losers. The Washington Post.
   Google Scholar
• Cogburn, D. L., & Espinoza-Vasquez, F. K. (2011). From networked nominee to networked nation: Examining the impact of Web 2.0 and social media on political participation and civic engagement in the 2008 Obama campaign. Journal of Political Marketing, 10(1–2), 189–213. doi: 10.1080/15377857.2011.540224
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, T. (2012). Santorum suspends campaign, clearing Romney's path. CNN. Retrieved May 8, 2012, from http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/10/politics/campaign-wrap/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. Proceedings of the ICWSM: Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Daku, M., Soroka, S., & Young, L. (2011). Lexicoder. Montréal: McGill University. Retrieved from: http://www.lexicoder.com
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., & Brenner, J. (2013). The demographics of social media users, 2012. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the Internet age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fahrni, A., & Klenner, M. (2008). Old wine or warm beer: Target-specific sentiment analysis of adjectives.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, B., & Chapman, S. (2008). Gone viral? Heard the buzz? A guide for public health practitioners and researchers on how Web 2.0 can subvert advertising restrictions and spread health information. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62(9), 778–782. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.073759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayo-Avello, D. (2012a). I wanted to predict elections with Twitter and all I got was this Lousy Paper – a Balanced Survey on election prediction using Twitter data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.6441.
   Google Scholar
• Gayo-Avello, D. (2012b). No, You cannot predict elections with Twitter. Internet Computing, IEEE, 16(6), 91–94. doi: 10.1109/MIC.2012.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Ibáñez, R., & Muresan, S., & Wacholder, N. (2011). Identifying sarcasm in Twitter: A closer look. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Short papers (Vol. 2). Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, OR, pp. 581–586.
   Google Scholar
• Hermida, A. (2010). From TV to Twitter: How ambient news became ambient journalism. M/C Journal, 13(2). Retrieved from: http://www.journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/viewArticle/220%26gt
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S., & Nadler, D. (2011). Does the early bird move the polls?: The use of the social media tool ‘Twitter’ by U.S. politicians and its impact on public opinion. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times. College Park, Maryland, ACM, pp. 182–186.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S., & Nadler, D. (2012). Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign?: The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 455–461. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C.-l., & Park, H. W. (2011). Sociology of hyperlink networks of web 1.0, Web 2.0, and Twitter: A Case Study of South Korea. Social Science Computer Review, 29(3), 354–368. doi: 10.1177/0894439310382517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., Jürgens, P., & Schoen, H. (2012). Why the pirate party won the German election of 2009 or the trouble with predictions: A response to Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sander, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. “Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 229–234. doi: 10.1177/0894439311404119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., & Park, H. (2012). Measuring Twitter-based political participation and deliberation in the South Korean context by using social network and Triple Helix indicators. Scientometrics, 90(1), 121–140. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0508-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, J. (2010). Twitter election predictions are more accurate than YouGov. The Guardian. London.
   Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. S., & Brown, A. R. (2011). Twitter: The electoral connection? Social Science Computer Review, 29, 419–436. doi: 10.1177/0894439310382749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C., & He, Y. (2009). Joint sentiment/topic model for sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management. Hong Kong, China, ACM: 375–384.
   Google Scholar
• Livne, A., Simmons, M. P., Adar, E., & Adamic, L. A. (2011). The party is over here: Structure and content in the 2010 election. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Mackowiak, M. (2011). Can we please stop talking about Huntsman? New York, National Review.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. (2003). Understanding me: Lectures and interviews. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metaxas, P. T., Mustafaraj, E., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2011). How (Not) to predict elections. Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE Third Inernational Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Murthy, D. (2013). Twitter: Social communication in the Twitter age. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Orsini, L. R. (2011). @Jon2012girls: Huntsman's daughters outpoll GOP candidate father. The Daily Dot, Daily Dot LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Postman, N. (2000). The humanism of media ecology. Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association (Vol. 1), Fordham University, New York, NY, pp. 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Qualman, E. (2011). Socialnomics: How social media transforms the way we live and do business. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ratkiewicz, J., Conover, M. D., Meiss, M., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, A., Menczer, F. (2011). Detecting and tracking political abuse in social media. Proceedings of the ICWSM: Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Sakaria, A. K. H., Singer, M. D., & Uhrmacher, D. T. (2012). #140ToWinIt. Pitt Political Review, 8(2), 1–8. doi: 10.5195/ppr.2012.19
   Google Scholar
• Skoric, M., Poor, N., Achananuparp, P., Lim, E.-P., & Jiang, J. (2012). Tweets and votes: A study of the 2011 Singapore general election. 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), Maui, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Sonmez, F., Blake, A., Weiner, R., Jennings, N., & Zamora, A. (2012, January 21). Newt Gingrich wins South Carolina Republican primary. The Washington Post. Washington, DC. Retrieved from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/post/republican-candidates-compete-in-michigan-and-arizona-live-primary-updates/2012/01/31/gIQAI9ofgR_blog.html
   Google Scholar
• The Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2012). Social media users focus on Ron Paul. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpel, I. M. (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Proceedings of the ICWSM: Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Tumasjan, A., & Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2011). Election forecasts With Twitter: How 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 402–418. doi: 10.1177/0894439310386557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnelis, K. (2008). Networked publics. Cambridge: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M., & Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2013). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 19(3), 477–501. doi: 10.1177/1354068811407580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitelaw, C., Navendu, G., & Shlomo, A. (2005). Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Bremen, Germany, pp. 625–631.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. B., & Gulati, G. J. (2008, March). The political impact of Facebook: Evidence from the 2006 midterm elections and 2008 nomination contest. Politics & Technology Review, 1, 11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (2011). Playing with politics: Political fans and Twitter faking in post-broadcast democracy. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 17(4), 445–461.
   Google Scholar
• Young, L., & Soroka, S. (2012). Affective news: The automated coding of sentiment in political texts. Political Communication, 29(2), 205–231. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.671234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, B., Kaufmann, S., & Diermeier, D. (2008). Exploring the characteristics of opinion expressions for political opinion classification. Proceedings of the 2008 International conference on Digital government research. Montreal, Canada, Digital Government Society of North America: 82–91.
   Google Scholar
• Zarrella, D. (2009). The social media marketing book. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Zeleny, J., & Parker, A. (2012). After ‘Oops’ in debate, Perry Says He'll stay in race. New York Times.
   Google Scholar