References
- Alwin, D. F., & Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Aging, cohorts, and the stability of sociopolitical orientations over the life span. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 169–195. doi: 10.1086/229744
- Angus, L., Snyder, L., & Sutherland-Smith, W. (2004). ICT and educational (dis)advantage: Families, computers and contemporary social educational inequalities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 3–18. doi: 10.1080/0142569032000155908
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
- Buckingham, D. (2006). Is there a digital generation? In D. Buckingham, & R. Willett (Eds.), Digital generations: Children, young people and new media (pp. 1–13). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120. doi: 10.1086/228943
- Dane, S. K., Mason, C. M., & O'Brien-McInally, B. A. (2013). Household internet use in Australia: A study in regional communities. CSIRO Report: EP1310907.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008
- Facer, K., Furlong, J., Furlong, R., & Sutherland, R. (2001). Constructing the child computer user: From public policy to private practices. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22, 91–108. doi: 10.1080/01425690123324
- Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2012). Digital inequality. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of internet studies (pp. 129–150). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hasebrink, U., Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., & Olafsson, K. (2009). EU kids online: Comparing children's online opportunities and risks across Europe: Cross-national comparisons for EU kids online. London: EU Kids Online.
- Helsper, E., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36, 503–520. doi: 10.1080/01411920902989227
- Holmes, J. (2011). Cyberkids or divided generations? Characterising young people's internet use in the UK with generic, continuum or typological models. New Media & Society, 13, 1104–1122. doi: 10.1177/1461444810397649
- Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittani, M., boyd, d., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., … Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Kalmus, V., Runnel, P., & Siibak, A. (2009). Opportunities and benefits online. In S. Livingstone & L. Haddon (Eds.), Kids online: Opportunities and risks for children (pp. 71–82). Bristol: The Policy Press.
- Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). Introduction. In S. Livingstone, & L. Haddon (Eds.), Kids online: Opportunities and risks for children (pp. 1–15). Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9, 671–696. doi: 10.1177/1461444807080335
- Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2008). Parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 581–599. doi: 10.1080/08838150802437396
- Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6.
- Richards, L. (1998). Using NVivo in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Robinson, L. (2009). A taste for the necessary. Information, Communication & Society, 12, 488–507. doi: 10.1080/13691180902857678
- Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
- Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
- Smith, J., Skrbis, Z., & Western, M. (2013). Beneath the ‘Digital Native’ myth: Understanding young Australians’ online time use. Journal of Sociology, 49, 97–118. doi: 10.1177/1440783311434856