Class struggles in the digital frontier: audience labour theory and social media users

References

• Adorno, T. (2001). The culture industry: Selected essays on mass culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aigrain, P. (2012). Sharing: Culture and the economy in the internet age. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akass, K., & McCabe, J. (2007). Analyzing fictional television genres. In E. Devereux (Ed.), Media studies: Key issues and debates (pp. 283–301). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. (2011a). Social network exploitation. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 82–101). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. (2011b). Exploitation in the data mine. In C. Fuchs, K. Boersma, A. Albrechtslund, & M. Sandoval (Eds.), internet and surveillance: The challenges of Web 2.0 and social media (pp. 71–88). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we think and know. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. (2014). Alienation's returns. In C. Fuchs & M. Sandoval (Eds.), Critique, social media and the information society (pp. 179–190). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A., & Colleoni, E. (2012). Value in informational capitalism and on the internet. The Information Society, 28(3), 135–150. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2012.669449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, second life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Callinicos, A. (2006). The resources of critique. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N. (2008). The valorization of surveillance: Towards a political economy of Facebook. Democratic Communiqué, 22(1), 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Delo, C. (2013o, June 6). Facebook drops ‘sponsored stories’ as it pares down Ad formats. Ad Age Digital.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1982). The rules of sociological method. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. (2013, June 7). Facebook has finally killed ‘sponsored stories’. The hated Ad format that made it look like you advertised something when you didn't. Business Insider.
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. (2012a). About sponsored stories. Retrieved from http://www.facebook.com/help?page=154500071282557
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. (2012b). What actions can be turned into sponsored stories? Retrieved from http://www.facebook.com/help/?faq=122074367874027
   Google Scholar
• Feher, M. (2009). Self-Appreciation; or, the aspirations of human capital. Public Culture, 21(1), 21–41. doi: 10.1215/08992363-2008-019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg, A. (2013, June 8). Facebook is finally getting rid of obnoxious ‘sponsored stories’. Gizmodo.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. (2012). How less alienation creates more exploitation? Audience labour on social network sites. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism, and Critique, 10(2), 171–183.
   Google Scholar
• Fraley vs. Facebook. (2011). Order granting in part and denying in part defendant's motion to dismiss. Case No.: 11-CV-01726-LHK.
   Google Scholar
• Fraley vs. Facebook. (2013). Order granting motion for final approval of settlement agreement. Case No.: 11-CV-01726-RS.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2011). Web 2.0, prosumption, and surveillance. Surveillance and Society, 8(3), 288–309.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2014). Dallas smythe reloaded. critical media and communication studies today. In V. Manzerolle & L. McGuigan (Eds.), The audience commodity in a digital age. Revisiting critical theory of commercial media (pp. 267–288). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C., & Sevignani, S. (2013). What is digital labour? What is digital work? What's their difference? And why do these questions matter for understanding social media? tripleC: Communication, Capitalism, and Critique, 11(2), 237–293.
   Google Scholar
• du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Mackay, H., & Negus, K. (1997). Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (1976). Dialectics of enlightenment. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Inside Facebook. (2011). Facebook's sponsored stories turns news feed posts into home page ads. Retrieved from http://www.insidefacebook.com/2011/01/24/sponsored-stories-feed-ads/
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jhally, S. (1986). The codes of advertising: Fetishism and the political economy of meaning in the consumer society. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jhally, S., & Livant, B. (1986). Watching as working: The valorization of audience consciousness. Journal of communication, 36(3), 124–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1986.tb01442.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krüger, S., & Johanssen, J. (2014). Alienation and digital labour – a depth-hermeneutic inquiry into online commodification and the unconscious. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism, and Critique, 12(2), 632–647.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. (2011). Google ads and the blindspot debate. Media, Culture, and Society, 33(3), 433–447. doi: 10.1177/0163443710394902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lih, A. (2009). The Wikipedia revolution: How a bunch of nobodies created the world's greatest encyclopedia. New York, NY: Hyperion.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, C., & Collins, J. (1993). Reading national geographic. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manzerolle, V., & McGuigan, L. (Eds.). (2014). The audience commodity in a digital age: Revisiting critical theory of commercial media. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1988). The economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844. New York: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1992). The poverty of philosophy. New York, NY: International.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1993). Capital, vol. 3. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform How we live, work, and think. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• McChesney, R. (2013). Digital disconnect: How capitalism is turning the internet against democracy. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mosco, V. (2009). The political economy of communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mosco, V., & McKercher, C. (2009). The labouring of communication: Will knowledge workers of the world unite? Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. (2010). Revisiting ‘mass communication’ and the ‘work’ of the audience in the new media environment. Media, Culture, and Society, 32(3), 505–516. doi: 10.1177/0163443710361658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radway, J. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36. doi: 10.1177/1469540509354673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2009). The end of the virtual: Digital methods. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. (1981). Covering Islam: How the media and the experts determine how we see the rest of the world. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, D. (2010). How to think about information. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, H. (1991). Culture, Inc.: The corporate takeover of public expression. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, T. (Ed.). (2013). Digital labour: The internet as playground and factory. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smythe, D. (1981). Dependency road: Communication, capitalism, consciousness and Canada. Norwood: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, N., Jackson, P., & Brooks, K. (2001). Making sense of men's magazines. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. (2010). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York, NY: Portfolio.
   Google Scholar
• Virno, P. (2001). General intellect. In A. Zanini & U. Fadini (Eds.), Lessico postfordista (A. Bove, Trans.). Milano: Interzone [Italian].
   Google Scholar
• Virno, P., & Hardt, M. (Ed.) (2006). Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wasko, J. (2001). Understanding Disney: The manufacture of fantasy. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar