Source effects in the micro-mobilization of collective action via social media

References

• Bakardjieva, M. (2012). Reconfiguring the mediapolis: New media and civic agency. New Media & Society, 14, 63–79. doi: 10.1177/1461444811410398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., Breunig, C., & Givens, T. (2008). Communication and political mobilization: Digital media and the organization of anti-Iraq war demonstrations in the US. Political Communication, 25, 269–289. doi: 10.1080/10584600802197434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 739–768. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddix, J. P., & Park, H. W. (2008). Online networks of student protest: The case of the living wage campaign. New Media & Society, 10, 871–891. doi: 10.1177/1461444808096249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15, 365–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00340.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2012). Collective action in organizations: Interaction and engagement in an Era of technological change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489, 295–298. doi: 10.1038/nature11421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. P., Schmierbach, M., Armstrong, C. L., Cho, J., McCluskey, M., McLeod, D. M., & Shah, D. V. (2006). Expressive responses to news stories about extremist groups: A framing experiment. Journal of Communication, 56, 271–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00019.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsting, S., & Postmes, T. (2002). Social movement participation in the digital age: Predicting offline and online collective action. Small Group Research, 33, 525–554. doi: 10.1177/104649602237169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, C. F., McCluskey, M., Stamm, K., Tanaka, K., Torres, M., & Scott, C. (2002). Group affiliations, opinion polarization, and global organizations: Views of the World trade organization before and after Seattle. Mass Communication & Society, 5, 433–450. doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0504_04
   Google Scholar
• Carty, V. (2010). New information communication technologies and grassroots mobilization. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 155–173. doi: 10.1080/13691180902915658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 151–192). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, M. (2000). Social movement networks virtual and real. Information, Communication & Society, 3, 386–401. doi: 10.1080/13691180051033333
   Google Scholar
• Diani, M., & McAdam, D. (2003). Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.x/full
   Google Scholar
• Ekins, P. (1992). A new World order: Grassroots movements for social change. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J. (2012). Private protest? Information, Communication & Society, 15, 591–608. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.665936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. R., & Boekkooi, M. (2010). Mobilizing friends and strangers. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 193–208. doi: 10.1080/13691180902878385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, C. J., & Park, E. (1997). Reference groups, opinion intensity, and public opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9, 213–232. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/9.3.213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, S. (2011). Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline. New Media & Society, 14, 225–243. doi: 10.1177/1461444811410408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, S., & Harp, D. (2012). Collective action on the Web. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 196–216. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.591411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herda-Rapp, A. (1998). The power of informal leadership: Women leaders in the civil rights movement. Sociological Focus, 31, 341–355. doi: 10.1080/00380237.1998.10571113
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., Vissers, S., Stolle, D., & Mahéo, V. A. (2010). The potential of Internet mobilization: An experimental study on the effect of Internet and face-to-face mobilization efforts. Political Communication, 27, 406–431. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2010.516799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, N., Kim, Y. M., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 407–430. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.496135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on #occupy everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39, 259–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. M. (2009). Issue Publics in the new information environment selectivity, domain specificity, and extremity. Communication Research, 36, 254–284. doi: 10.1177/0093650208330253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52, 519–531. doi: 10.2307/2095297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2007). Online memes, affinities, and cultural production. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 199–227). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 62, 231–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01628.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maireder, A., & Schwarzenegger, C. (2011). A movement of connected individuals. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 171–195. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.589908
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 64–90. doi: 10.1086/228463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2003). Dynamics of contention. Social Movement Studies, 2, 99–102. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2003.10035370
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., & Wolfson, M. (1996). Resource mobilization by local social movement organizations: Agency, strategy, and organization in movement against drinking and driving. American Sociological Review, 61, 1070–1088. doi: 10.2307/2096309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. M., & Hertog, J. K. (1999). Social control, social change and the mass media's role in the regulation of protest groups. In D. Demers & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Mass media, social control and social change (pp. 305–330). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meikle, G. (2002). Future active: Media activism and the Internet. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercea, D. (2012). Digital prefigurative participation: The entwinement of online communication and offline participation in protest events. New Media & Society, 14, 153–169. doi: 10.1177/1461444811429103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60, 413–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell, M. E. (2003). Survey and experimental evidence for a reliable and valid measure of internal political efficacy. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 589–602. doi: 10.1086/378965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshagan, H. (1996). Reference group influence on opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 335–354. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/8.4.335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, M. R. (2007). Personal relationships and personal networks. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., & Brunsting, S. (2002). Collective action in the age of the Internet. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 290–301. doi: 10.1177/089443930202000306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (2003). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
   Google Scholar
• Son, J., & Lin, N. (2008). Social capital and civic action: A network-based approach. Social Science Research, 37, 330–349. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51, 52–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02872.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatarchevskiy, T. (2011). The ‘popular’ culture of internet activism. New Media & Society, 13, 297–313. doi: 10.1177/1461444810372785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thackeray, R., & Hunter, M. A. (2010). Empowering youth: Use of technology in advocacy to affect social change. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 575–591. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01503.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62, 363–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2002). New media, new movements? The role of the Internet in shaping the ‘anti-globalization’ movement. Information, Communication & Society, 5, 465–493. doi: 10.1080/13691180208538801
   Google Scholar
• Van de Donk, W., Loader, B. D., Nixon, P. G., & Rucht, D. (2004). Cyberprotest: New media, citizens and social movements. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 1146–1171. doi: 10.1080/13691181003628307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnelis, K. (2008). Networked publics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeich, S., & Levine, S. (1994). Political efficacy: Enhancing the construct and its relationship to mobilization of people. Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 259–271. doi: 10.1002/1520-6629(199407)22:3<259::AID-JCOP2290220306>3.0.CO;2-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Zúñiga, H. G., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38, 397–421. doi: 10.1177/0093650210384984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar