Wiki-worthy: collective judgment of candidate notability

References

• Anthony, D., Smith, S. W., & Williamson, T. (2009). Reputation and reliability in collective goods: The case of the online encyclopedia Wikipedia. Rationality and Society, 21(3), 283–306. doi:10.1177/1043463109336804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J., Forsythe, R., Gorham, M., Hahn, R., Hanson, R., Ledyard, J. O., … Zitzewitz, E. (2008). The promise of prediction markets. Science, 320(5878), 877–878. doi:10.1126/science.1157679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2008). Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(9), 1493–1512. doi:10.1002/asi.20857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, J., Nelson, F., & Rietz, T. (2007). Prediction market accuracy in the long run. International Journal of Forecasting, 24(2), 285–300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2008.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. R. (2011). Wikipedia as a data source for political scientists: Accuracy and completeness of coverage. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(02), 339–343. doi:10.1017/S1049096511000199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. E. (2012). Forecasting the presidential and congressional elections of 2012: The trial-heat and the seats-in-trouble models. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(04), 630–634. doi:10.1017/S104909651200090X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., & Allison, P. D. (2014). Insiders, outsiders, and the struggle for consecration in cultural fields: A core-periphery perspective. American Sociological Review, 79(2), 258–281. doi:10.1177/0003122414520960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J., & Rojas, F. (2013). More tweets, more votes: Social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e79449. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, R. S., & Palfrey, T. R. (1998). Campaign spending and incumbency: An alternative simultaneous equations approach. The Journal of Politics, 60(02), 355–373. doi: 10.2307/2647913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEC. (2010). Federal Elections 2010: Election results for the US Senate and the US house of representatives. Retrieved December 19, 2012, from http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2010/federalelections2010.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Gayo-Avello, D., Metaxas, P. T., & Mustafaraj, E. (2011). Limits of electoral predictions using twitter. ICWSM. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/viewPDFInterstitial/2862/3254
   Google Scholar
• Gnisci, A., Van Dalen, A., & Di Conza, A. (2014). Interviews in a polarized television market: The Anglo-American watchdog model put to the test. Political Communication, 31(1), 112–130. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.747190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (2001). Special interest politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2005). Statistical methods for communication science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47, 153–161. doi: 10.2307/1912352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlavac, M. (2014). Stargazer: LaTeX code and ASCII text for well-formatted regression and summary statistics tables. R package version 5.0. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stargazer
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, D. N., de Vreese, C. H., & Albaek, E. (2011). Incumbency bonus in election news coverage explained: The logics of political power and the media market. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 264–282. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01540.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman, S. (2015). All that glitters: The betting markets and the 2013 Australian Federal election. To appear. In C. Johnson & J. Wanna (Eds.), The Abbott's gambit: The 2013 Australian federal election (pp. 143–159). Canberra: Australian National University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, G. C. (1989). Strategic politicians and the dynamics of US House elections, 1946–1986. The American Political Science Review, 83(3), 773–893. doi: 10.2307/1962060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., Jurgens, P., & Schoen, H. (2012). Why the pirate party won the German election of 2009 or The trouble with predictions: A response to Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sander, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 229–234. doi:10.1177/0894439311404119
   Google Scholar
• Keegan, B. C. (2013). A history of news work on Wikipedia. In Proceedings of ninth international symposium on Wikis and open collaboration. Hong Kong, China. New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2491062
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Kleinman, S. B. (2011). Preelection selective exposure: Confirmation bias versus informational utility. Communication Research, 39(2), 170–193. doi:10.1177/0093650211400597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D. M., Kennedy, R., King, G., & Vespignani, A. (2014). The parable of Google flu: Traps in big data analysis. Science, 343(6176), 1203–1205. doi: 10.1126/science.1248506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A. L., Brewer, D., … Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Computational social science. Science, 323(5915), 721–723. doi: 10.1126/science.1167742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., Margolin, D., Keegan, B., & Lazer, D. (2013). Voices of victory: A computational focus group framework for tracking opinion shift in real time. Proceedings of ACM conference on world wide web (WWW) conference, Rio.
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, D. B., & Monge, P. R. (2013). Conceptual retention in epistemic communities. In P. Moy (Ed.), Communication and community (pp. 1–22). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13, 114–113. doi: 10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey, K., DiGrazia, J., & Rojas, F. (2014). Twitter publics: How online political communities signaled electoral outcomes in the 2010 US house election. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 436–450. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.892149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messner, M., & South, J. (2011). Legitimizing Wikipedia: How US national newspapers frame and use the online encyclopedia in their coverage. Journalism Practice, 5(2), 145–160. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2010.506060
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (1995). Effects of horse-race coverage on campaign coffers: Strategic contributing in presidential primaries. The Journal of Politics, 57(04), 1015. doi:10.2307/2960400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (1997). Mechanisms of momentum: Does thinking make it so? The Journal of Politics, 59(01), 104. doi:10.2307/2998217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nannestad, P., & Paldam, M. (1994). The VP-function: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years. Public Choice, 79(3–4), 213–245. doi: 10.1007/BF01047771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neff, J. J., Laniado, D., Kappler, K. E., Volkovich, Y., Aragón, P., & Kaltenbrunner, A. (2013). Jointly they edit: Examining the impact of community identification on political interaction in Wikipedia. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e60584. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neiman, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 44–51.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B. R., & Smith, N. A. (2010). From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. ICWSM, 11, 122–129.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reagle, J. M. (2010). Good faith collaboration: The culture of Wikipedia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, D. (2009). Forecasting elections comparing prediction markets, polls, and their biases. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(5), 895–916. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfp082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, E. J. (2012). The mediatization of e-campaigning: Evidence from german party websites in state, national, and European parliamentary elections 2002–2009. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 283–302. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01577.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tresch, A. (2008). Politicians in the media: Determinants of legislators’ presence and prominence in Swiss newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(1), 67–90. doi:10.1177/1940161208323266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sander, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In Proceedings of the fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (pp. 178–185). Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• UK election results: Data for every candidate in every seat. (2013). The Guardian. Retrieved March 6, 2013, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/may/07/uk-election-results-data-candidates-seats
   Google Scholar
• Unankard, S., Li, X., Sharaf, M., Zhong, J., & Li, X. (2014). Predicting elections from social networks based on sub-event detection and sentiment analysis. In Web information systems engineering–WISE 2014 (pp. 1–16). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. (2014a). Retrieved April 14, 2014, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Introduction
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. (2014b). Retrieved April 14, 2014, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. (2014c). Retrieved April 14, 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. (2014d). Retrieved April 14, 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Politicians
   Google Scholar