Protest leadership in the age of social media

References

• Aneja, A. (2011). Protest movements in West Asia: Some impressions. Strategic Analysis, 35(4), 547–551. doi:10.1080/09700161.2011.576090
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A. (2006). Brands: Meaning and value in media culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Atton, C., & Hamilton, J. F. (2008). Alternative journalism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Awad, M., & Dixonm, H. (2011, April 13). Special report: Inside the Egyptian revolution. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/13/us-egypt-revolution-idUSTRE73C18E20110413
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bob, C. (2005). The marketing of rebellion: Insurgents, media, and international activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14, 1164–1180. doi:10.1177/1461444812440159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. (2014). Hacker, hoaxer, whistleblower, spy. The many faces of anonymous. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, W., Shaw, M., & Stammers, N. (Eds.). (2005). Global activism, global media. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (1999). Social movements. An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Della Ratta, D., & Valeriani, A. (2012). Remixing the spring! Connective leadership and read-write practices in the 2011 Arab uprisings. CyberOrient: Online Journal of the Virtual Middle East, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.cyberorient.net/article.do?articleId=7763
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. (2014). Create a page. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/pages/create
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghonim, W. (2012). Revolution 2.0: The power of the people is greater than the people in power: A memoir. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hara, N., & Shachaf, P. (2008). Online peace movement organizations: A comparative analysis. In I. Chen & T. Kidd (Eds.), Social information technology: Connection society and cultural issues (pp. 52–67). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. D., Sanger, D. E., Fahim, K., El-Naggar, M., & Mazzetti, M. (2011), February 13. A Tunisian-Egyptian link that shook Arab history. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/14/world/middleeast/14egypt-tunisia-protests.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Kuebler, J. (2011). Overcoming the digital divide: The internet and political mobilization in Egypt and Tunisia. Cyber Orient: Online Journal of the Virtual Middle East, 5(1). Retrieved from: http://www.cyberorient.net/article.do?articleId=6212
   Google Scholar
• Lesch, A. M. (2011). Egypt's spring: Causes of the revolution. Middle East Policy, 18(3), 35–48. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4967.2011.00496.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, E. A., & Hutchins, B. (2009). Power games: Environmental protest, news media and the internet. Media, Culture & Society, 31(4), 579–595. doi:10.1177/0163443709335201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 62, 231–248. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01628.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotan, G., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., Pearce, I., & boyd, d. (2011). The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1375–1405. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1246/613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lury, C. (2004). Brands: The logos of the global economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, S. (2011, July 8). Key force in Tahrir Square: Egypt's labor movement. The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2011/0708/Key-force-in-Tahrir-Square-Egypt-s-labor-movement
   Google Scholar
• Mariette, P. (2012, July 3). 12 questions: Priscilla Grim [Blogazine]. Retrieved from http://12questions.us/2012/07/03/priscilla-grim/
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1996). The framing function of movement tactics: Strategic dramaturgy in the American civil rights movement. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements (pp. 338–355). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, P., & Maney, G. M. (2000). Political processes and local newspaper coverage of protest events: From selection bias to triadic interactions. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 463–505. doi:10.1086/316964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poell, T., & Borra, E. (2012). Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: The social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Journalism, 13(6), 695–713. doi:10.1177/1464884911431533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poell, T., & Darmoni, K. (2012). Twitter as a multilingual space: The articulation of the Tunisian revolution through# sidibouzid. NECSUS. European Journal of Media Studies, 1(1), 14–34. Retrieved from http://www.necsus-ejms.org/twitter-as-a-multilingual-space-the-articulation-of-the-tunisian-revolution-through-sidibouzid-by-thomas-poell-and-kaouthar-darmoni/
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, B. (2013, May). Studying Facebook via data extraction: The Netvizz application. Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM Web Science conference, pp. 346–355. doi:10.1145/2464464.2464475
   Google Scholar
• Rucht, D. (2004). The quadruple “A”: Media strategies of protest movements since the 1960s. In W. van de Donk, B. D. Loader, P. G. Nixon, & D. Rucht (Eds.), Cyberprotest: New media, citizens and social movements (pp. 29–56). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B.Jr., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481. doi:10.2307/2095581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., & Kriesi, H. (Eds.). (2004). The Blackwell companion to social movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 137–146. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62, 363–379. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youmans, W. L., & York, J. C. (2012). Social media and the activist toolkit: User agreements, corporate interests, and the information infrastructure of modern social movements. Journal of Communication, 62, 315–329. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajácz, R. (2013). WikiLeaks and the problem of anonymity: A network control perspective. Media Culture & Society, 35, 489–505. doi:10.1177/0163443713483793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar